• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

肾肿瘤评分与 T1 期透明细胞肾细胞癌肿瘤增殖活性相关。

Nephrometry score correlated with tumor proliferative activity inT1 clear cell renal cell carcinoma.

机构信息

Department of Urology, Hokkaido University Graduate School of Medicine, Sapporo, Hokkaido.

Department of Urology, Hokkaido University Graduate School of Medicine, Sapporo, Hokkaido.

出版信息

Urol Oncol. 2019 May;37(5):301.e19-301.e25. doi: 10.1016/j.urolonc.2019.02.005. Epub 2019 Feb 27.

DOI:10.1016/j.urolonc.2019.02.005
PMID:30826166
Abstract

OBJECTIVE

To evaluate the association between the RENAL nephrometry score (RNS) and tumor proliferative activity assessed by immunohistochemistry in patients with localized renal cell carcinoma.

METHODS

The current study included 145 pathological T1 (pT1) clear cell renal cell carcinomas (ccRCC). Tumor proliferative activity was assessed with the Ki67 index and microvessel density (MVD). RNS was retrospectively assessed in the present study. We divided patients into 3 groups according to RNS (RNS 4-6: low-complexity, 7-9: moderate complexity, and 10-12: high-complexity tumors) and compared the Ki67 index as well as MVD among the 3 groups. The association between the Ki67index/MVD and each component (R, E, N, A, L, h) was also evaluated.

RESULTS

There were 56 low, 84 moderate, and 5 high-complexity tumors. The median Ki67 index of all tumors was 5.34% (interquartile range: 3.28-8.57). The median Ki67 index of low, moderate, and high-complexity tumors was 3.97%, 6.39%, and 11.27%, respectively, with a significant difference among the 3 groups (Kruskal-Wallis test, P = 0.0004). On the other hand, the median MVD of low, moderate, and high-complexity tumors was 14.11%, 14.42%, and 21.22%, respectively, and there were no significant differences among the 3 groups. In terms of each RNS component, there were significant differences in the Ki67 index among the 3 groups in N (P = 0.0101) and L (P = 0.0280) components, respectively.

CONCLUSIONS

The revealed association between RNS and the Ki67 index in pT1 clear cell renal cell carcinomas further supports the previous findings that the anatomy of renal cell carcinoma is associated with the malignant potential of localized clear cell renal cell carcinoma, which may provide additional information for treatment decision.

摘要

目的

评估 RENAL 肾脏肿瘤评分(RNS)与局部肾细胞癌患者肿瘤增殖活性的免疫组织化学评估之间的相关性。

方法

本研究纳入了 145 例病理 T1(pT1)透明细胞肾细胞癌(ccRCC)患者。通过 Ki67 指数和微血管密度(MVD)评估肿瘤增殖活性。本研究回顾性评估了 RNS。根据 RNS 将患者分为 3 组(RNS 4-6:低复杂度、7-9:中复杂度、10-12:高复杂度肿瘤),比较 3 组之间的 Ki67 指数和 MVD。还评估了 Ki67 指数/MVD 与各组成部分(R、E、N、A、L、h)之间的关系。

结果

低复杂度肿瘤 56 例,中复杂度肿瘤 84 例,高复杂度肿瘤 5 例。所有肿瘤的中位 Ki67 指数为 5.34%(四分位间距:3.28-8.57)。低、中、高复杂度肿瘤的中位 Ki67 指数分别为 3.97%、6.39%和 11.27%,3 组间差异有统计学意义(Kruskal-Wallis 检验,P = 0.0004)。另一方面,低、中、高复杂度肿瘤的中位 MVD 分别为 14.11%、14.42%和 21.22%,3 组间差异无统计学意义。就每个 RNS 成分而言,N(P = 0.0101)和 L(P = 0.0280)成分的 Ki67 指数在 3 组间差异有统计学意义。

结论

在 pT1 透明细胞肾细胞癌中,RNS 与 Ki67 指数之间的相关性进一步支持了先前的发现,即肾细胞癌的解剖结构与局部透明细胞肾细胞癌的恶性潜能相关,这可能为治疗决策提供额外的信息。

相似文献

1
Nephrometry score correlated with tumor proliferative activity inT1 clear cell renal cell carcinoma.肾肿瘤评分与 T1 期透明细胞肾细胞癌肿瘤增殖活性相关。
Urol Oncol. 2019 May;37(5):301.e19-301.e25. doi: 10.1016/j.urolonc.2019.02.005. Epub 2019 Feb 27.
2
High R.E.N.A.L. Nephrometry scores are associated with pathologic upstaging of clinical T1 renal-cell carcinomas in radical nephrectomy specimens: implications for nephron-sparing surgery.高R.E.N.A.L.肾计量评分与根治性肾切除标本中临床T1期肾细胞癌的病理分期上调相关:对保留肾单位手术的意义。
J Endourol. 2014 Sep;28(9):1138-42. doi: 10.1089/end.2014.0123. Epub 2014 Jun 24.
3
R.E.N.A.L. nephrometry score in clinical stage T1 renal mass: Ramathibodi hospital experience.临床分期为T1期肾肿块的R.E.N.A.L.肾计量评分:拉玛蒂博迪医院的经验
J Med Assoc Thai. 2015 Feb;98(2):181-7.
4
Imaging Tool for Predicting Renal Clear Cell Carcinoma Fuhrman Grade: Comparing R.E.N.A.L. Nephrometry Score and CT Texture Analysis.预测肾透明细胞癌 Fuhrman 分级的影像学工具:比较 R.E.N.A.L. 肾肿瘤评分和 CT 纹理分析。
Biomed Res Int. 2021 Dec 23;2021:1821876. doi: 10.1155/2021/1821876. eCollection 2021.
5
R.E.N.A.L. nephrometry score predicts postoperative recurrence of localized renal cell carcinoma treated by radical nephrectomy.R.E.N.A.L.肾计量评分可预测接受根治性肾切除术治疗的局限性肾细胞癌的术后复发情况。
Int J Clin Oncol. 2016 Apr;21(2):367-372. doi: 10.1007/s10147-015-0879-3. Epub 2015 Jul 29.
6
[Detection and clinical significance of platelet derived growth factor-BB and microvessel density in clear cell renal cell carcinoma].[血小板衍生生长因子-BB及微血管密度在肾透明细胞癌中的检测及临床意义]
Zhonghua Zhong Liu Za Zhi. 2013 Sep;35(9):672-7.
7
Are urologists and radiologists equally effective in determining the RENAL Nephrometry score?泌尿外科医生和放射科医生在确定RENAL肾计量评分方面的效果一样吗?
Ann Surg Oncol. 2015 May;22(5):1618-24. doi: 10.1245/s10434-014-4152-1. Epub 2014 Nov 11.
8
Thermal ablation of the small renal mass: case selection using the R.E.N.A.L.-Nephrometry Score.小肾肿瘤的热消融治疗:使用 R.E.N.A.L.-Nephrometry 评分进行病例选择。
Urol Oncol. 2013 Oct;31(7):1292-7. doi: 10.1016/j.urolonc.2011.09.006. Epub 2012 Apr 21.
9
The initial experience with RENAL Nephrometry in children, adolescents, and young adults with renal tumors.儿童、青少年和青年肾肿瘤患者的 RENAL 分数初始经验。
Pediatr Blood Cancer. 2014 Aug;61(8):1434-9. doi: 10.1002/pbc.25027. Epub 2014 Mar 9.
10
Renal lesions with low R.E.N.A.L nephrometry score are associated with more indolent renal cell carcinomas (RCCs) or benign histology: findings in an Australian cohort.肾肿瘤 R.E.N.A.L 评分低与惰性肾细胞癌(RCC)或良性组织学相关:澳大利亚队列研究结果。
BJU Int. 2012 Apr;109 Suppl 3:44-7. doi: 10.1111/j.1464-410X.2012.11046.x.

引用本文的文献

1
Nephrometry scores to predict oncological outcomes following partial nephrectomy (UroCCR Study 70).肾部分切除术(UroCCR 研究 70)后预测肿瘤学结果的肾切除术评分。
World J Urol. 2023 Dec;41(12):3559-3566. doi: 10.1007/s00345-023-04633-3. Epub 2023 Oct 4.
2
A new scaffold-free tumoroid model provides a robust preclinical tool to investigate invasion and drug response in Renal Cell Carcinoma.一种新型无支架肿瘤模型为研究肾细胞癌的侵袭和药物反应提供了一个强大的临床前工具。
Cell Death Dis. 2023 Sep 22;14(9):622. doi: 10.1038/s41419-023-06133-z.
3
Prediction of Fuhrman nuclear grade for clear cell renal carcinoma by a multi-information fusion model that incorporates CT-based features of tumor and serum tumor associated material.
通过结合基于CT的肿瘤特征和血清肿瘤相关物质的多信息融合模型预测透明细胞肾细胞癌的Fuhrman核分级
J Cancer Res Clin Oncol. 2023 Nov;149(17):15855-15865. doi: 10.1007/s00432-023-05353-2. Epub 2023 Sep 6.
4
Imaging Tool for Predicting Renal Clear Cell Carcinoma Fuhrman Grade: Comparing R.E.N.A.L. Nephrometry Score and CT Texture Analysis.预测肾透明细胞癌 Fuhrman 分级的影像学工具:比较 R.E.N.A.L. 肾肿瘤评分和 CT 纹理分析。
Biomed Res Int. 2021 Dec 23;2021:1821876. doi: 10.1155/2021/1821876. eCollection 2021.
5
Added Value of Systemic Inflammation Markers in Predicting Clinical Stage T1 Renal Cell Carcinoma Pathologically Upstaged to T3a.全身炎症标志物在预测病理分期上调至T3a的临床分期T1肾细胞癌中的附加价值
Front Oncol. 2021 May 31;11:679536. doi: 10.3389/fonc.2021.679536. eCollection 2021.
6
New Preoperative Nomogram Using the Centrality Index to Predict High Nuclear Grade Clear Cell Renal Carcinoma.利用中心性指数预测高核级透明细胞肾细胞癌的新型术前列线图
Cancer Manag Res. 2019 Dec 31;11:10921-10928. doi: 10.2147/CMAR.S229571. eCollection 2019.
7
Predicting biological behaviour of newly diagnosed renal masses: a possible role of cell proliferation biomarkers?预测新诊断肾肿块的生物学行为:细胞增殖生物标志物的潜在作用?
Ann Transl Med. 2019 Jul;7(Suppl 3):S143. doi: 10.21037/atm.2019.06.22.
8
Nephrometry score correlated with tumor proliferative activity inT1 clear cell renal cell carcinoma-the tiger in the tall grasses versus the cat in plain sight.肾计量评分与T1期透明细胞肾细胞癌的肿瘤增殖活性相关——草丛中的老虎与显而易见的猫。
Ann Transl Med. 2019 Jul;7(Suppl 3):S134. doi: 10.21037/atm.2019.06.07.
9
Clinical impact of segmental renal vein invasion on recurrence in patients with clinical T1 renal cell carcinoma undergoing partial nephrectomy.部分肾切除术治疗 T1 期肾癌患者中节段性肾静脉侵犯对复发的临床影响。
Int J Clin Oncol. 2020 Mar;25(3):464-471. doi: 10.1007/s10147-019-01543-6. Epub 2019 Sep 17.