Suppr超能文献

口腔膜剂的溶出度试验:药典方法与非药典方法的实验比较。

Dissolution testing of oral film preparations: Experimental comparison of compendial and non-compendial methods.

机构信息

Institute of Pharmaceutics and Biopharmaceutics, Heinrich Heine University, Universitaetsstr. 1, 40225 Duesseldorf, Germany.

Pharmaceutical Sciences Laboratory, Faculty of Science and Engineering, Åbo Akademi University, BioCity, Artillerigatan, 6A, 20520 Turku, Finland.

出版信息

Int J Pharm. 2019 Apr 20;561:124-134. doi: 10.1016/j.ijpharm.2019.02.042. Epub 2019 Feb 28.

Abstract

In vitro dissolution testing is one of the most frequently used tests in pharmaceutical quality control, since evaluation of the drug release profile and estimation of the dosage form performance is enabled. However, for oral film preparations no standardized compendial dissolution method or specifications are available worldwide. Therefore, four different dissolution methods described in the literature, namely the basket method, the paddle and glass disc (PGD) method, the flow-through cell with adapted film sample holders produced via 3D printing (FTC + FH3D) and the "Punch and Filter" (PAF) method were chosen and their suitability to investigate oral films with different release properties was compared. For this purpose, oral films with immediate (ODF) and prolonged theophylline release (ODF) as well as double layer films (ODF) were produced and investigated. All produced ODFs disintegrated rapidly in 27-46 s and showed content uniformity with acceptance values between 7.3 and 11.3%. The FTC + FH3D and the PGD method showed increased discriminatory power and were suitable to investigate the integrity of the shielding layer of ODF as shown by linear prolonged release (mean dissolution time at 80% drug release (MDT) of 366.8 and 217.1 min for FTC + FH3D and PGD method), which was not possible applying the basket and PAF method. These methods did not allow clear discrimination between ODF and ODF, since immediate release profiles with MDT values of 4.1 and 11.0 min for the basket method and 6.8 and 15.5 min for the PAF method were found for both, ODF and ODF respectively. The FTC + FH3D method provided high flexibility, which may be used to simulate gastrointestinal transit. The PAF method reflects physiological conditions of the oral cavity and enables mimicking the in vivo film application. These methods are particularly valuable for research and development purposes. Due to the simple and well standardized instrumental setup as well as high robustness, the basket and PGD method are particularly suitable for use in pharmaceutical quality control.

摘要

体外溶出试验是药物质量控制中最常用的试验之一,因为可以评估药物释放曲线并估计剂型性能。然而,对于口腔薄膜制剂,全球范围内没有标准化的药典溶出方法或规格。因此,选择了文献中描述的四种不同的溶出方法,即篮法、桨碟(PGD)法、通过 3D 打印生产的带有改良薄膜样品架的流通池(FTC+FH3D)和“打孔和过滤”(PAF)法,并比较了它们用于研究具有不同释放特性的口腔薄膜的适用性。为此,制备了即时(ODF)和延长茶碱释放(ODF)的口腔薄膜以及双层薄膜(ODF),并进行了研究。所有制备的 ODF 在 27-46 秒内迅速崩解,显示出含量均匀性,接受值在 7.3 到 11.3 之间。FTC+FH3D 和 PGD 方法显示出更高的区分能力,适合研究 ODF 屏蔽层的完整性,如线性延长释放所示(80%药物释放时的平均溶解时间(MDT)分别为 366.8 和 217.1 分钟对于 FTC+FH3D 和 PGD 方法),而篮法和 PAF 方法则无法实现。这些方法无法在 ODF 和 ODF 之间进行明确区分,因为篮法和 PAF 法的 MDT 值分别为 4.1 和 11.0 分钟和 6.8 和 15.5 分钟,分别适用于 ODF 和 ODF。FTC+FH3D 方法提供了高度的灵活性,可用于模拟胃肠道转运。PAF 方法反映了口腔的生理条件,并能够模拟体内薄膜应用。这些方法对于研究和开发特别有价值。由于仪器设置简单且标准化程度高,并且具有高度的稳健性,篮法和 PGD 法特别适合用于药物质量控制。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验