• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

通过层次任务分析识别并降低功能性鼻内镜鼻窦手术中的风险。

Identifying and reducing risks in functional endoscopic sinus surgery through a hierarchical task analysis.

作者信息

Corbett Mel, O'Connor Paul, Byrne Dara, Thornton Mona, Keogh Ivan

机构信息

Department of Otorhinolaryngology Head and Neck Surgery University Hospital Galway.

出版信息

Laryngoscope Investig Otolaryngol. 2018 Nov 28;4(1):5-12. doi: 10.1002/lio2.220. eCollection 2019 Feb.

DOI:10.1002/lio2.220
PMID:30828612
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC6383311/
Abstract

OBJECTIVE

To develop a hierarchical task listing of steps required to perform successful Functional Endoscopic Sinus Surgery (FESS). To complete a technical and human factor analysis of tasks resulting in the identification of errors, frequency of occurrence, severity, and reduction through remediation.

METHODS

A triangulation of methods was used in order to derive the steps required to complete a FESS: 1) a literature review was carried out of published descriptions of FESS techniques; 2) observations of three FESS; 3) interviews with surgeons on FESS techniques. Data sets were combined to develop a task analysis of a correct approach to conducting FESS. A review by 12 surgeons, and observation of 25 FESS resulted in refinement of the task analysis. With input from five consultant surgeons and one consultant anesthetist, a Systematic Human Error Reduction and Prediction Approach (SHERPA) was used to identify the risks and mitigating steps in FESS.

RESULTS

Ten tasks and 49 subtasks required for a correct approach to completing FESS were identified based on literature review and expert consensus. A risk score for each subtask was calculated from a suitable risk matrix. Risk reduction methods at each subtask were detailed. High-scoring subtasks were evaluated and varying strategies examined to reduce the likelihood and mitigate the impact of error. The study demonstrates the usefulness of the HTA and SHERPA approach in standardization and optimization of clinical practice in order to improve patient safety.

CONCLUSION

Hierarchical Task Analysis and SHERPA are valuable tools to deconstruct expert performance and to highlight potential errors in FESS. The HTA and SHERPA approach to surgical procedures are useful learning and assessment tools for novice surgeons. The information derived offers the opportunity to improve surgical training and enhance patient safety by identifying high-risk steps in the procedure, and how risk can be mitigated.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

2c Outcomes Research.

摘要

目的

制定成功实施功能性内镜鼻窦手术(FESS)所需步骤的分层任务清单。对任务进行技术和人为因素分析,以确定错误、发生频率、严重程度,并通过纠正措施减少错误。

方法

采用三角测量法得出完成FESS所需的步骤:1)对已发表的FESS技术描述进行文献综述;2)观察三台FESS手术;3)就FESS技术采访外科医生。合并数据集以开展FESS正确实施方法的任务分析。12位外科医生进行的审查以及对25台FESS手术的观察使任务分析得到完善。在五位顾问外科医生和一位顾问麻醉师的参与下,采用系统的人为错误减少与预测方法(SHERPA)来识别FESS中的风险及缓解措施。

结果

基于文献综述和专家共识,确定了正确完成FESS所需的10项任务和49项子任务。根据合适的风险矩阵计算每个子任务的风险评分。详细说明了每个子任务的风险降低方法。对高风险子任务进行评估,并研究不同策略以降低错误发生的可能性并减轻其影响。该研究证明了分层任务分析(HTA)和SHERPA方法在临床实践标准化和优化以提高患者安全性方面的有用性。

结论

分层任务分析和SHERPA是解构专家操作并突出FESS中潜在错误的宝贵工具。HTA和SHERPA手术程序方法是新手外科医生有用的学习和评估工具。所获得的信息通过识别手术过程中的高风险步骤以及如何降低风险,为改进外科培训和提高患者安全性提供了机会。

证据水平

2c结果研究。

相似文献

1
Identifying and reducing risks in functional endoscopic sinus surgery through a hierarchical task analysis.通过层次任务分析识别并降低功能性鼻内镜鼻窦手术中的风险。
Laryngoscope Investig Otolaryngol. 2018 Nov 28;4(1):5-12. doi: 10.1002/lio2.220. eCollection 2019 Feb.
2
Totally endoscopic cartilage tympanoplasty: a hierarchical task analysis.全内镜鼓膜成形术:层次任务分析。
J Laryngol Otol. 2023 Dec;137(12):1326-1333. doi: 10.1017/S0022215122001992. Epub 2022 Sep 12.
3
The application of human reliability analysis to carpal tunnel decompression.人因可靠性分析在腕管减压术中的应用。
Ann R Coll Surg Engl. 2024 May;106(5):432-438. doi: 10.1308/rcsann.2023.0038. Epub 2023 Jun 29.
4
Predicting dispensing errors in community pharmacies: An application of the Systematic Human Error Reduction and Prediction Approach (SHERPA).预测社区药店配药错误:系统人为失误减少和预测方法(SHERPA)的应用。
PLoS One. 2022 Jan 4;17(1):e0261672. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0261672. eCollection 2022.
5
Human error identification and risk assessment in loading and unloading of petroleum products by road trucks using the SHERPA and fuzzy inference system method.使用SHERPA和模糊推理系统方法对公路卡车装卸石油产品过程中的人为错误识别与风险评估
Heliyon. 2024 Jul 4;10(15):e34072. doi: 10.1016/j.heliyon.2024.e34072. eCollection 2024 Aug 15.
6
Human reliability analysis of bronchoscope-assisted percutaneous dilatational tracheostomy: implications for simulation-based education.支气管镜辅助经皮扩张气管切开术的人体可靠性分析:对基于模拟的教育的启示
Adv Simul (Lond). 2020 Nov 5;5(1):30. doi: 10.1186/s41077-020-00149-7.
7
Constructing hierarchical task analysis in surgery.构建外科手术中的层次任务分析
Surg Endosc. 2008 Jan;22(1):107-11. doi: 10.1007/s00464-007-9380-z. Epub 2007 May 5.
8
Functional Endoscopic Sinus Surgery: Key Points for Safer Surgery.功能性鼻内镜鼻窦手术:安全手术要点
Ear Nose Throat J. 2024 Nov;103(3_suppl):5S-14S. doi: 10.1177/01455613241287280. Epub 2024 Sep 27.
9
Assessment and Reduction of Human Error using SHERPA Technique in Chemotherapy Department of a Large Military Hospital.在一家大型军队医院肿瘤科使用SHERPA技术评估和减少人为失误
Iran J Nurs Midwifery Res. 2023 Jul 24;28(4):426-429. doi: 10.4103/ijnmr.ijnmr_382_21. eCollection 2023 Jul-Aug.
10
Systematic review of endoscopic sinus surgery for nasal polyps.鼻息肉内镜鼻窦手术的系统评价
Health Technol Assess. 2003;7(17):iii, 1-159. doi: 10.3310/hta7170.

引用本文的文献

1
Complications Associated with Microdebriders in Otolaryngology Procedures from 2011 to 2021: A MAUDE Study.2011年至2021年耳鼻喉科手术中与微型清创器相关的并发症:医疗器械不良事件报告系统(MAUDE)研究
OTO Open. 2023 Oct 19;7(4):e83. doi: 10.1002/oto2.83. eCollection 2023 Oct-Dec.
2
The application of human reliability analysis to carpal tunnel decompression.人因可靠性分析在腕管减压术中的应用。
Ann R Coll Surg Engl. 2024 May;106(5):432-438. doi: 10.1308/rcsann.2023.0038. Epub 2023 Jun 29.
3
"What brought you in today?": Modeling patient-provider clinic visits to characterize rural providers' antibiotic treatment decisions.“你今天为什么来?”:建立患者-提供者就诊模型,以描述农村提供者的抗生素治疗决策。
Res Social Adm Pharm. 2023 Jun;19(6):896-905. doi: 10.1016/j.sapharm.2023.02.007. Epub 2023 Feb 17.
4
Hierarchical task analysis of endoscopic sleeve gastroplasty.内镜套扎胃成形术的层级任务分析。
Surg Endosc. 2022 Jul;36(7):5167-5182. doi: 10.1007/s00464-021-08893-1. Epub 2021 Nov 29.
5
Human reliability analysis of bronchoscope-assisted percutaneous dilatational tracheostomy: implications for simulation-based education.支气管镜辅助经皮扩张气管切开术的人体可靠性分析:对基于模拟的教育的启示
Adv Simul (Lond). 2020 Nov 5;5(1):30. doi: 10.1186/s41077-020-00149-7.

本文引用的文献

1
The 100 Most Cited Articles on Healthcare Simulation: A Bibliometric Review.医疗保健模拟领域最具引用率的100篇文章:文献计量学综述。
Simul Healthc. 2018 Jun;13(3):211-220. doi: 10.1097/SIH.0000000000000293.
2
A hierarchical task analysis of cricothyroidotomy procedure for a virtual airway skills trainer simulator.针对虚拟气道技能训练模拟器的环甲膜切开术的层次任务分析。
Am J Surg. 2016 Sep;212(3):475-84. doi: 10.1016/j.amjsurg.2015.08.029. Epub 2015 Oct 19.
3
Complication rates after functional endoscopic sinus surgery: analysis of 50,734 Japanese patients.功能性内镜鼻窦手术后的并发症发生率:对50734例日本患者的分析。
Laryngoscope. 2015 Aug;125(8):1785-91. doi: 10.1002/lary.25334. Epub 2015 May 6.
4
The McGill simulator for endoscopic sinus surgery (MSESS): a validation study.麦吉尔鼻窦内窥镜手术模拟器(MSESS):一项验证研究。
J Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 2014 Oct 24;43(1):40. doi: 10.1186/s40463-014-0040-8.
5
A meta-analysis of the effectiveness of crew resource management training in acute care domains.急性护理领域中机组资源管理培训效果的荟萃分析。
Postgrad Med J. 2014 Dec;90(1070):699-708. doi: 10.1136/postgradmedj-2014-132800. Epub 2014 Nov 4.
6
Human-factors training for surgical trainees.外科实习生的人为因素培训。
Clin Teach. 2014 Jun;11(3):165-9. doi: 10.1111/tct.12147.
7
Beyond crisis resource management: new frontiers in human factors training for acute care medicine.超越危机资源管理:急性医疗中人因学培训的新前沿。
Curr Opin Anaesthesiol. 2013 Dec;26(6):699-706. doi: 10.1097/ACO.0000000000000007.
8
Surgical checklists: the human factor.手术核对清单:人为因素
Patient Saf Surg. 2013 May 14;7(1):14. doi: 10.1186/1754-9493-7-14.
9
Reducing the risk of retained throat packs after surgery.降低术后咽部敷料残留的风险。
Br J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 2012 Oct;50(7):680-1. doi: 10.1016/j.bjoms.2012.01.012. Epub 2012 Feb 21.
10
Nationwide incidence of major complications in endoscopic sinus surgery.全国范围内内镜鼻窦手术主要并发症的发生率。
Int Forum Allergy Rhinol. 2012 Jan-Feb;2(1):34-9. doi: 10.1002/alr.20101. Epub 2011 Nov 8.