Institute for Psychology.
J Exp Psychol Gen. 2019 Nov;148(11):1938-1952. doi: 10.1037/xge0000568. Epub 2019 Mar 4.
The concurrent processing of optic flow and biological motion is crucial for navigating to a destination without colliding with others. Neuroimaging studies and formal models have provided evidence for distinct neural mechanisms involved in processing the 2 types of motion. It may, therefore, be possible to process both types of motions independently. To test for possible interferences at the behavioral level, we conducted a dual task paradigm in which we presented a point-light walker in a flow field that simulated forward motion. Observers judged both the articulation of the walker and the heading direction. We found that varying the difficulty of one task had no effect on the performance of the other task, arguing against interferences. Performance in the biological motion task was similar in dual and single task conditions. For the heading task, concurrence costs were observed when the heading task was difficult but not when it was easy. Concurrence costs did not depend on practice effects, effects of specific motor responses, and incidental processing of biological motion. In line with neuroimaging studies and formal models, our results argue not only for independent processing of optic flow and biological motion but also for concurrence costs affecting heading performance. (PsycINFO Database Record (c) 2019 APA, all rights reserved).
同时处理光流和生物运动对于在不与他人碰撞的情况下到达目的地至关重要。神经影像学研究和形式模型为处理这两种运动的不同神经机制提供了证据。因此,可能可以独立处理这两种类型的运动。为了在行为水平上测试可能的干扰,我们进行了一项双任务范式实验,在该实验中,我们在模拟向前运动的流场中呈现一个点光源步行者。观察者判断步行者的关节运动和行进方向。我们发现,一个任务难度的变化对另一个任务的表现没有影响,这表明没有干扰。在双任务和单任务条件下,生物运动任务的表现相似。对于行进方向任务,当任务难度较大时会出现并发成本,但当任务难度较小时则不会出现。并发成本不依赖于练习效应、特定运动反应的影响以及生物运动的附带处理。与神经影像学研究和形式模型一致,我们的结果不仅支持光流和生物运动的独立处理,还支持影响行进方向表现的并发成本。(PsycINFO 数据库记录(c)2019 APA,保留所有权利)。