Translational Health Sciences, Bristol Medical School, University of Bristol, Bristol, UK.
Neurological and Musculoskeletal Sciences Division, North Bristol NHS Trust, Bristol, UK.
J Parkinsons Dis. 2019;9(2):301-313. doi: 10.3233/JPD-191576.
Intraputamenal glial cell line-derived neurotrophic factor (GDNF), administered every 4 weeks to patients with moderately advanced Parkinson's disease, did not show significant clinical improvements against placebo at 40 weeks, although it significantly increased [18F]DOPA uptake throughout the entire putamen.
This open-label extension study explored the effects of continued (prior GDNF patients) or new (prior placebo patients) exposure to GDNF for another 40 weeks.
Using the infusion protocol of the parent study, all patients received GDNF without disclosing prior treatment allocations (GDNF or placebo). The primary outcome was the percentage change from baseline to Week 80 in the OFF state Unified Parkinson's Disease Rating Scale (UPDRS) motor score.
All 41 parent study participants were enrolled. The primary outcome decreased by 26.7±20.7% in patients on GDNF for 80 weeks (GDNF/GDNF; N = 21) and 27.6±23.6% in patients on placebo for 40 weeks followed by GDNF for 40 weeks (placebo/GDNF, N = 20; least squares mean difference: 0.4%, 95% CI: -13.9, 14.6, p = 0.96). Secondary endpoints did not show significant differences between the groups at Week 80 either. Prespecified comparisons between GDNF/GDNF at Week 80 and placebo/GDNF at Week 40 showed significant differences for mean OFF state UPDRS motor (-9.6±6.7 vs. -3.8±4.2 points, p = 0.0108) and activities of daily living score (-6.9±5.5 vs. -1.0±3.7 points, p = 0.0003). No treatment-emergent safety concerns were identified.
The aggregate study results, from the parent and open-label extension suggest that future testing with GDNF will likely require an 80- rather than a 40-week randomized treatment period and/or a higher dose.
每隔四周向中度晚期帕金森病患者给予苍白球内胶质细胞源性神经营养因子(GDNF)治疗,与安慰剂相比,在 40 周时并未显示出显著的临床改善,尽管它显著增加了整个苍白球中 [18F]DOPA 的摄取。
这项开放性扩展研究探讨了继续(先前接受 GDNF 治疗的患者)或新(先前接受安慰剂治疗的患者)暴露于 GDNF 治疗 40 周的效果。
使用母研究的输注方案,所有患者均接受 GDNF 治疗,而不透露先前的治疗分配(GDNF 或安慰剂)。主要结局是在 80 周的 OFF 状态下,统一帕金森病评定量表(UPDRS)运动评分与基线相比的变化百分比。
所有 41 名母研究参与者均入组。接受 GDNF 治疗 80 周的患者(GDNF/GDNF;n=21)的主要结局下降了 26.7±20.7%,而接受安慰剂治疗 40 周后再接受 GDNF 治疗 40 周的患者(安慰剂/GDNF,n=20)的主要结局下降了 27.6±23.6%;两组间的最小二乘均值差异为 0.4%,95%CI:-13.9,14.6,p=0.96)。80 周时,次要终点在两组之间也没有显示出显著差异。在第 80 周时,GDNF/GDNF 与第 40 周时的安慰剂/GDNF 之间的预先指定比较显示,在平均 OFF 状态 UPDRS 运动评分(-9.6±6.7 与-3.8±4.2 分,p=0.0108)和日常生活活动评分(-6.9±5.5 与-1.0±3.7 分,p=0.0003)方面有显著差异。未发现新的治疗相关安全性问题。
来自母研究和开放性扩展研究的综合研究结果表明,未来使用 GDNF 的检测可能需要 80 周而不是 40 周的随机治疗期和/或更高剂量。