David Geffen School of Medicine, UCLA, Los Angeles, California.
Skin Concept, Munich, Germany.
Dermatol Surg. 2020 Jan;46(1):50-60. doi: 10.1097/DSS.0000000000001883.
Patient-reported outcomes are increasingly recognized as important measures of treatment benefit.
To evaluate subject-reported satisfaction and impact outcomes with onabotulinumtoxinA treatment in neurotoxin-naive adults with forehead lines (FHL), glabellar lines (GL), and crow's feet lines (CFL).
This Phase 3 study randomized 787 subjects to onabotulinumtoxinA 64 U (FHL 20 U, GL 20 U, and CFL 24 U), 40 U (FHL 20 U, GL 20 U, and CFL placebo), or placebo in double-blind Period 1. Subjects could receive up to 2 additional 64 U treatments in open-label Period 2. Patient-reported outcomes were assessed using the validated Facial Line Satisfaction Questionnaire (FLSQ) and 11-item Facial Line Outcomes (FLO-11) Questionnaire.
The proportion of subjects mostly or very satisfied was significantly greater with onabotulinumtoxinA 64 U and 40 U versus placebo (87.9% and 81.4% vs 3.2%; p < .0001). Responder rates on FLSQ Impact Domain, FLO-11 Items 1, 4, 5, and total score were significantly greater with onabotulinumtoxinA versus placebo on Day 30 (p < .0001). Responder rates favoring onabotulinumtoxinA in Period 1 were maintained with repeated onabotulinumtoxinA 64 U treatment in Period 2.
OnabotulinumtoxinA treatment was associated with high subject satisfaction and significant improvements in appearance-related psychological and emotional impacts.
患者报告的结果越来越被认为是治疗益处的重要衡量标准。
评估神经毒素初治的额纹(FHL)、眉间纹(GL)和鱼尾纹(CFL)患者对肉毒毒素 A 治疗的主观满意度和影响结局。
这项 3 期研究将 787 例受试者随机分为肉毒毒素 A 64U(FHL 20U、GL 20U 和 CFL 24U)、40U(FHL 20U、GL 20U 和 CFL 安慰剂)或安慰剂组,在双盲期 1 中进行治疗。受试者可在开放标签期 2 中接受多达 2 次额外的 64U 治疗。使用经验证的面部线满意度问卷(FLSQ)和 11 项面部线结局问卷(FLO-11)评估患者报告的结局。
与安慰剂相比,肉毒毒素 A 64U 和 40U 的受试者中非常满意或多数满意的比例显著更高(87.9%和 81.4%比 3.2%;p<.0001)。在第 30 天,FLSQ 影响域、FLO-11 项目 1、4、5 和总分的应答率与安慰剂相比,肉毒毒素 A 显著更高(p<.0001)。在第 1 期内,肉毒毒素 A 治疗的应答率在第 2 期内接受重复肉毒毒素 A 64U 治疗后仍保持。
肉毒毒素 A 治疗与较高的患者满意度和与外观相关的心理和情绪影响的显著改善相关。