Suppr超能文献

肉毒毒素 A 治疗额部和眉间线:来自 3 期双盲研究的受试者报告满意度和影响。

OnabotulinumtoxinA for Treatment of Forehead and Glabellar Lines: Subject-Reported Satisfaction and Impact From a Phase 3 Double-Blind Study.

机构信息

Skin Concept, Munich, Germany.

David Geffen School of Medicine, UCLA, Los Angeles, California.

出版信息

Dermatol Surg. 2019 May;45(5):689-699. doi: 10.1097/DSS.0000000000001779.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

Patient-reported outcomes are important measures of treatment benefit in facial aesthetic medicine.

OBJECTIVE

Evaluate prespecified subject-reported satisfaction and impact outcomes with onabotulinumtoxinA treatment of forehead lines (FHL) and glabellar lines (GL).

METHODS

The study randomized (3:1) 391 adults with moderate to severe FHL and GL to onabotulinumtoxinA (FHL, 20 U; GL, 20 U) or placebo in double-blind period 1 (days 0-180); subjects could receive up to 2 additional onabotulinumtoxinA treatments in open-label period 2. Patient-reported outcomes were assessed using the validated Facial Line Satisfaction Questionnaire (FLSQ) and the 11-item Facial Line Outcomes (FLO-11) Questionnaire.

RESULTS

The proportion of subjects mostly or very satisfied with treatment was significantly greater with onabotulinumtoxinA than with placebo (90.3% vs 1.0%; p < .0001). Responder rates on FLSQ Impact Domain (73.9% vs 18.9%), FLO-11 Item 1 (85.4% vs 3.6%), Item 4 (77.2% vs 11.2%), Item 5 (83.5% vs 7.8%), and total score (86.0% vs 6.9%) were significantly greater with onabotulinumtoxinA than with placebo on Day 30 (p < .0001). Responder rates favoring onabotulinumtoxinA in Period 1 were generally maintained with repeated treatment during Period 2.

CONCLUSION

Subjects were highly satisfied with onabotulinumtoxinA treatment and reported significant improvements in appearance-related psychological and emotional impacts of their facial lines.

摘要

背景

患者报告的结局是评估面部美容医学治疗获益的重要指标。

目的

评估前额线(FHL)和眉间线(GL)接受肉毒毒素 A 治疗的预设患者报告满意度和影响结局。

方法

该研究将 391 例中重度 FHL 和 GL 的成年人随机(3:1)分为肉毒毒素 A 组(FHL,20U;GL,20U)或安慰剂组,双盲期 1(第 0-180 天);在开放标签期 2 中,患者最多可接受 2 次额外的肉毒毒素 A 治疗。采用经验证的面部线满意度问卷(FLSQ)和 11 项面部线结局问卷(FLO-11)评估患者报告的结局。

结果

与安慰剂相比,肉毒毒素 A 治疗后患者对治疗的满意度更高(90.3%比 1.0%;p<0.0001)。在 FLSQ 影响领域(73.9%比 18.9%)、FLO-11 第 1 项(85.4%比 3.6%)、第 4 项(77.2%比 11.2%)、第 5 项(83.5%比 7.8%)和总分(86.0%比 6.9%)上,肉毒毒素 A 治疗后的应答率均显著高于安慰剂(p<0.0001)。在第 1 期,肉毒毒素 A 治疗的应答率在第 2 期重复治疗时仍普遍维持。

结论

患者对肉毒毒素 A 治疗非常满意,并报告了他们面部线条的外观相关心理和情绪影响显著改善。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验