Betsy Q. Cliff (
Richard A. Hirth is a professor in the Department of Health Management and Policy, University of Michigan School of Public Health.
Health Aff (Millwood). 2019 Mar;38(3):448-455. doi: 10.1377/hlthaff.2018.05015.
Increasing the use of high-value medical services and reducing the use of services with little or no clinical value are key goals for efficient health systems. Yet encouraging the use of high-value services may unintentionally affect the use of low-value services. We examined the likelihood of high- and low-value service use in the first two years after an insurance benefit change in 2011 for one state's employees that promoted use of high-value preventive services. In the intervention group, compared to a control sample with stable benefit plans, in year 1 the likelihood of high-value service use increased 11.0 percentage points, and the likelihood of low-value service use increased 7.9 percentage points. For that year we associated 74 percent of the increase in high-value services and 57 percent of the increase in low-value services with greater use of preventive visits. Our results imply that interventions aimed at increasing receipt of high-value preventive services can cause spillovers to low-value services and should include deterrents to low-value care as implemented in later years of this program.
提高高价值医疗服务的利用率,降低低价值或无临床价值服务的利用率,是高效卫生系统的关键目标。然而,鼓励使用高价值服务可能会无意中影响低价值服务的使用。我们研究了在 2011 年一项保险福利改革后两年内,一个州的员工使用高价值预防性服务的情况。在干预组中,与福利计划稳定的对照组相比,在第 1 年,高价值服务使用的可能性增加了 11.0 个百分点,低价值服务使用的可能性增加了 7.9 个百分点。对于那一年,我们将高价值服务增加的 74%和低价值服务增加的 57%归因于预防性就诊次数的增加。我们的研究结果表明,旨在增加高价值预防性服务利用率的干预措施可能会对低价值服务产生溢出效应,并且应该在该计划的后期包含对低价值护理的抑制措施。