• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

景观生态健康评估:以半干旱草原矿业城市为例。

Assessment of Landscape Ecological Health: A CaseStudy of a Mining City in a Semi-Arid Steppe.

机构信息

Engineering Research Center of Ministry of Education for Mine Ecological Restoration, China University of Mining and Technology, Xuzhou 221116, China.

School of Environment Science and Spatial Informatics, China University of Mining and Technology, Xuzhou 221116, China.

出版信息

Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2019 Mar 1;16(5):752. doi: 10.3390/ijerph16050752.

DOI:10.3390/ijerph16050752
PMID:30832282
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC6427308/
Abstract

The ecological status of the semi-arid steppes in China is fragile. Under the long-term and high-intensity development of mining, the ecological integrity and biodiversity of steppe landscapes have been destroyed, causing soil pollution, grassland degradation, landscape function defect, and so on. Previous studies have mainly focused on ecosystem health assessment in mining areas. Landscape ecological health (LEH) pays more attention to the interactions between different ecosystems. Therefore, the ecological assessment of mining cities is more suitable on a landscape scale. Meanwhile, the existing LEH assessment index systems are not applicable in ecologically fragile areas with sparse population, underdeveloped economy, and in relatively small research areas. The purpose of this study was to construct a LEH assessment index system and evaluate the LEH of a mining city located in a semi-arid steppe. Xilinhot is a typical semi-arid steppe mining city in China. The contradictions between the human, land and ecological environment are serious. A new model Condition, Vigor, Organization, Resilience, and Ecosystem (CVORE) model was constructed that integrated five subsystems (services) from the perspectives of ecology, landscape ecology, mining science, and geography. This study used the CVORE model to systematically evaluate the LEH in Xilinhot city in terms of five LEH levels, including very healthy, healthy, sub-healthy, unhealthy and morbid landscape. Research results show that the areas of the very healthy, healthy, sub-healthy, unhealthy and morbid landscapes are 13.23, 736.35, 184.5, 66.76 and 20.63 km², respectively. The healthy landscapes area accounts for 72.08% and most grasslands are healthy. The sub-healthy landscapes are mainly located around areas with higher disturbances due to human activities. The morbid or unhealthy landscapes are concentrated in the mining areas. The proposed CVORE model can enrich the foundations for the quantitative assessment of Landscape Ecological Health of Mining Cities in Semi-arid Steppe (LEHMCSS). This study provided a new LEH assessment approach (CVORE model), which can support landscape ecological restoration, ecological environmental protection and urban planning of the semi-arid steppe mining cities.

摘要

中国半干旱草原的生态状况较为脆弱。在长期高强度矿业开发的影响下,草原景观的生态完整性和生物多样性遭到破坏,导致土壤污染、草原退化、景观功能缺陷等问题。已有研究主要集中在矿区的生态系统健康评估方面,而景观生态健康(LEH)更关注不同生态系统之间的相互作用。因此,矿业城市的生态评估更适合在景观尺度上进行。同时,现有的 LEH 评估指标体系不适用于人口稀少、经济欠发达、研究区域较小的生态脆弱地区。本研究旨在构建一个 LEH 评估指标体系,并评估位于半干旱草原的矿业城市的 LEH。锡林浩特是中国典型的半干旱草原矿业城市,人类、土地和生态环境之间的矛盾较为突出。本研究构建了一个新的条件、活力、组织、恢复力和生态系统(CVORE)模型,该模型综合了生态学、景观生态学、矿业科学和地理学五个子系统(服务)。本研究利用 CVORE 模型,从五个 LEH 水平(非常健康、健康、亚健康、不健康和病态景观)对锡林浩特市的 LEH 进行了系统评估。研究结果表明,非常健康、健康、亚健康、不健康和病态景观的面积分别为 13.23、736.35、184.5、66.76 和 20.63km²。健康景观面积占 72.08%,大部分草原处于健康状态。亚健康景观主要分布在人类活动干扰较高的区域周围。病态或不健康景观集中在矿区。所提出的 CVORE 模型可以丰富半干旱草原矿业城市景观生态健康(LEHMCSS)定量评估的基础。本研究提供了一种新的 LEH 评估方法(CVORE 模型),可为半干旱草原矿业城市的景观生态恢复、生态环境保护和城市规划提供支持。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/4e5b/6427308/3d000d4de322/ijerph-16-00752-g012.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/4e5b/6427308/4a92e03901c0/ijerph-16-00752-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/4e5b/6427308/4438ffa3b729/ijerph-16-00752-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/4e5b/6427308/6d3cbcf116db/ijerph-16-00752-g003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/4e5b/6427308/59b4a41697b0/ijerph-16-00752-g004.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/4e5b/6427308/1996bd43b031/ijerph-16-00752-g005.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/4e5b/6427308/6622a82cfd9c/ijerph-16-00752-g006.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/4e5b/6427308/1e234d28d3f6/ijerph-16-00752-g007.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/4e5b/6427308/8b2355226ab7/ijerph-16-00752-g008.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/4e5b/6427308/6d2774cca71d/ijerph-16-00752-g009.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/4e5b/6427308/bb0897ee8670/ijerph-16-00752-g010.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/4e5b/6427308/90a6737f4977/ijerph-16-00752-g011.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/4e5b/6427308/3d000d4de322/ijerph-16-00752-g012.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/4e5b/6427308/4a92e03901c0/ijerph-16-00752-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/4e5b/6427308/4438ffa3b729/ijerph-16-00752-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/4e5b/6427308/6d3cbcf116db/ijerph-16-00752-g003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/4e5b/6427308/59b4a41697b0/ijerph-16-00752-g004.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/4e5b/6427308/1996bd43b031/ijerph-16-00752-g005.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/4e5b/6427308/6622a82cfd9c/ijerph-16-00752-g006.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/4e5b/6427308/1e234d28d3f6/ijerph-16-00752-g007.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/4e5b/6427308/8b2355226ab7/ijerph-16-00752-g008.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/4e5b/6427308/6d2774cca71d/ijerph-16-00752-g009.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/4e5b/6427308/bb0897ee8670/ijerph-16-00752-g010.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/4e5b/6427308/90a6737f4977/ijerph-16-00752-g011.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/4e5b/6427308/3d000d4de322/ijerph-16-00752-g012.jpg

相似文献

1
Assessment of Landscape Ecological Health: A CaseStudy of a Mining City in a Semi-Arid Steppe.景观生态健康评估:以半干旱草原矿业城市为例。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2019 Mar 1;16(5):752. doi: 10.3390/ijerph16050752.
2
Urban blue-green space landscape ecological health assessment based on the integration of pattern, process, function and sustainability.基于格局、过程、功能和可持续性整合的城市蓝绿空间景观生态健康评估。
Sci Rep. 2022 May 11;12(1):7707. doi: 10.1038/s41598-022-11960-9.
3
[Identification of key ecological restoration areas for abandoned mining sites in Handan City: Based on ecological function and spatial importance].[邯郸市废弃矿山关键生态修复区识别:基于生态功能与空间重要性]
Ying Yong Sheng Tai Xue Bao. 2024 Jun;35(6):1671-1680. doi: 10.13287/j.1001-9332.202406.026.
4
Identification of priority areas for territorial space ecological restoration in arid area of Northwest China: A case study of Zhangye City in Heihe River basin.识别中国西北地区干旱区领土空间生态恢复的优先领域:以黑河流域张掖市为例。
Ying Yong Sheng Tai Xue Bao. 2024 Feb;35(2):469-479. doi: 10.13287/j.1001-9332.202402.025.
5
Impacts of Human Activities on Ecosystem Service Value in Arid and Semi-Arid Ecological Regions of China.人类活动对中国干旱和半干旱生态区域生态系统服务价值的影响
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2021 Oct 22;18(21):11121. doi: 10.3390/ijerph182111121.
6
A legendary landscape in peril: Land use and land cover change and environmental impacts in the Wulagai River Basin, Inner Mongolia.一个处于危险中的传奇景观:内蒙古乌兰盖河流域的土地利用/土地覆被变化及环境影响。
J Environ Manage. 2022 Jan 1;301:113816. doi: 10.1016/j.jenvman.2021.113816. Epub 2021 Sep 24.
7
Soil wind erosion evaluation and sustainable management of typical steppe in Inner Mongolia, China.中国内蒙古典型草原土壤风蚀评价及可持续管理。
J Environ Manage. 2021 Jan 1;277:111488. doi: 10.1016/j.jenvman.2020.111488. Epub 2020 Oct 15.
8
Landscape Evolution and It's Impact of Ecosystem Service Value of the Wuhan City, China.中国武汉市的景观演变及其对生态系统服务价值的影响。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2021 Dec 9;18(24):13015. doi: 10.3390/ijerph182413015.
9
Dynamic simulation of landscape ecological security and analysis of coupling coordination degree: A case study of Bole.景观生态安全动态模拟与耦合协调度分析——以博乐市为例
PLoS One. 2024 Feb 8;19(2):e0297860. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0297860. eCollection 2024.
10
Influence of large open-pit mines on the construction and optimization of urban ecological networks: A case study of Fushun City, China.大型露天矿对城市生态网络建设与优化的影响:以中国抚顺市为例。
PLoS One. 2024 Jun 27;19(6):e0303016. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0303016. eCollection 2024.

引用本文的文献

1
Influence of surface coal mining on carbon storage in semi-arid steppe.露天煤矿开采对半干旱草原碳储存的影响。
Sci Rep. 2025 May 8;15(1):15981. doi: 10.1038/s41598-025-01148-2.
2
Evaluation of the effect of ecological restoration in mineral resource cities and analysis of driving factors.矿产资源城市生态修复效果评价及驱动因素分析
Sci Rep. 2025 Apr 25;15(1):14543. doi: 10.1038/s41598-025-99043-3.
3
Evaluation and Analysis of Elderly Mental Health Based on Artificial Intelligence.基于人工智能的老年人心理健康评估与分析。

本文引用的文献

1
Eco-cultural health, global health, and sustainability.生态文化健康、全球健康与可持续性。
Ecol Res. 2011;26(6):1039-1049. doi: 10.1007/s11284-010-0703-5. Epub 2010 Mar 31.
2
Assessment of Regional Ecosystem Health-A Case Study of the Golden Triangle of Southern Fujian Province, China.区域生态系统健康评估——以中国闽南金三角为例。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2018 Apr 19;15(4):802. doi: 10.3390/ijerph15040802.
3
Links among human health, animal health, and ecosystem health.人类健康、动物健康和生态系统健康之间的联系。
Occup Ther Int. 2023 Feb 9;2023:7077568. doi: 10.1155/2023/7077568. eCollection 2023.
4
A Method for Identifying the Spatial Range of Mining Disturbance Based on Contribution Quantification and Significance Test.基于贡献量化和显著性检验的采矿干扰空间范围识别方法
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2022 Apr 24;19(9):5176. doi: 10.3390/ijerph19095176.
5
Urban blue-green space landscape ecological health assessment based on the integration of pattern, process, function and sustainability.基于格局、过程、功能和可持续性整合的城市蓝绿空间景观生态健康评估。
Sci Rep. 2022 May 11;12(1):7707. doi: 10.1038/s41598-022-11960-9.
6
Study on the Mental Health of the Elderly under Different Pension Models.不同养老金模式下老年人心理健康研究。
J Healthc Eng. 2022 Feb 8;2022:2367406. doi: 10.1155/2022/2367406. eCollection 2022.
7
Using Participatory Spatial Tools to Unravel Community Perceptions of Land-Use Dynamics in a Mine-Expanding Landscape in Ghana.运用参与式空间工具揭示加纳一个矿业扩张景观中社区对土地利用动态的感知。
Environ Manage. 2021 Nov;68(5):720-737. doi: 10.1007/s00267-021-01494-7. Epub 2021 Jul 1.
8
Spatiotemporal Analysis and Control of Landscape Eco-Security at the Urban Fringe in Shrinking Resource Cities: A Case Study in Daqing, China.资源型收缩城市边缘区景观生态安全的时空分析与调控——以大庆市为例
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2019 Nov 21;16(23):4640. doi: 10.3390/ijerph16234640.
9
An Improved Ecological Services Valuation Model in Land Use Project.土地利用项目中改进的生态服务价值评估模型。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2019 Apr 25;16(8):1474. doi: 10.3390/ijerph16081474.
Annu Rev Public Health. 2013;34:189-204. doi: 10.1146/annurev-publhealth-031912-114426. Epub 2013 Jan 16.
4
Land use-based landscape planning and restoration in mine closure areas.基于土地利用的矿山闭坑区景观规划与修复。
Environ Manage. 2011 May;47(5):739-50. doi: 10.1007/s00267-011-9638-z. Epub 2011 Feb 27.
5
Assessing ecosystem health.评估生态系统健康。
Trends Ecol Evol. 1998 Oct 1;13(10):397-402. doi: 10.1016/s0169-5347(98)01449-9.
6
[A review on the concept, characteristic and assessment of landscape health].[关于景观健康的概念、特征及评估的综述]
Ying Yong Sheng Tai Xue Bao. 2002 Nov;13(11):1511-5.
7
[Physiological indices of grazed grassland under health management].[健康管理下放牧草地的生理指标]
Ying Yong Sheng Tai Xue Bao. 2002 Aug;13(8):1049-53.
8
[Assessment method of ecosystem health].[生态系统健康评估方法]
Ying Yong Sheng Tai Xue Bao. 2002 Apr;13(4):486-90.