Avans University, Academie Social Work, The Netherlands.
Tranzo, TSB, 7899Tilburg University, The Netherlands.
J Intellect Disabil. 2020 Dec;24(4):559-583. doi: 10.1177/1744629519829965. Epub 2019 Mar 4.
This review aimed to examine the perceptions of parents, professionals and informal network members regarding support needs of parents with intellectual disabilities (ID). In accordance with the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) statement, five databases were systematically searched and 19 qualitative studies were reviewed using thematic analyses. No data were available on the perceptions of the informal social network. Data on parents and professionals were categorized in four themes (type of support, sources of support, conditions of successful support and characteristics of support members). Data from professionals did not refer to emotional support needs or to the potential support of volunteers, friends and neighbours. Data from parents indicated a preference to be treated as 'full' parents, whereas professionals tended to focus on disabilities of parents. Results and implications contribute to insights into support needs of parents with ID from different perspectives and may help identify new entry points to improve future interventions and working alliances.
本综述旨在探讨家长、专业人士和非正式网络成员对智障家长支持需求的看法。根据系统评价和荟萃分析的首选报告项目(PRISMA)声明,对五个数据库进行了系统搜索,并使用主题分析对 19 项定性研究进行了回顾。非正式社交网络的看法没有数据。关于父母和专业人士的数据分为四个主题(支持类型、支持来源、支持成功的条件和支持成员的特征)。专业人士的数据并未涉及情感支持需求或志愿者、朋友和邻居的潜在支持。来自家长的数据表明他们更希望被视为“完整”的家长,而专业人士则倾向于关注家长的残疾问题。研究结果和意义有助于从不同角度深入了解智障家长的支持需求,并有助于确定新的切入点,以改善未来的干预措施和工作联盟。