University of Derby, UK.
Appl Ergon. 2019 May;77:100-106. doi: 10.1016/j.apergo.2018.12.007. Epub 2019 Feb 15.
A quantitative field study measured end-user availability, knowledge and use levels of adjustable office chair functions in Korea-based office workers, together with their perceived barriers towards making adjustments. Fifty-one English-speaking workers were interviewed and surveyed in a related design. Results showed that of the number of adjustable functions available on their office chair (M = 5.39, SD = 2.3), participants knew fewer than half of them (M = 2.51, SD = 1.52) and used even less (M = 1.86, SD = 1.21). Fifty-three percent of participants knew two or less and 73% had used only two or less. Ten percent had used none. Results suggested physical needs (such as increased comfort or postural change) were a strong driver for previous chair adjustment behaviour. Perceived cognitive barriers played a more significant role in limiting chair adjustment knowledge and use than physical or organizational barriers. Highly adjustable office chairs have the possibility of satisfying the adjustment needs of most end-users. However, adjustable chair functions need to be both available and known in order to be used.
一项定量实地研究测量了韩国办公人员对可调节办公椅功能的终端用户可用性、知识水平和使用水平,以及他们对调整办公椅的认知障碍。采用相关设计,对 51 名讲英语的工作人员进行了访谈和调查。结果表明,在其办公椅可调节功能的数量中(M=5.39,SD=2.3),参与者知道的功能不到一半(M=2.51,SD=1.52),使用的功能更少(M=1.86,SD=1.21)。53%的参与者知道两个或更少,73%的参与者只用过两个或更少。10%的参与者从未使用过任何功能。结果表明,身体需求(如增加舒适度或姿势改变)是先前调整椅子行为的主要驱动力。认知障碍在限制椅子调整知识和使用方面比身体或组织障碍发挥更重要的作用。高度可调节的办公椅有可能满足大多数终端用户的调整需求。然而,为了使用可调节椅子,必须具备可用性和可认知性。