• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

拓展当前对认知不公正与痴呆症的理解:借鉴污名理论

Expanding current understandings of epistemic injustice and dementia: Learning from stigma theory.

作者信息

Young Jessica A, Lind Christopher, Orange J B, Savundranayagam Marie Y

机构信息

College of Nursing and Health Sciences, Flinders University, Adelaide, Australia; Health and Rehabilitation Sciences Program, Faculty of Health Sciences, Western University, London, Canada.

College of Nursing and Health Sciences, Flinders University, Adelaide, Australia.

出版信息

J Aging Stud. 2019 Mar;48:76-84. doi: 10.1016/j.jaging.2019.01.003. Epub 2019 Feb 1.

DOI:10.1016/j.jaging.2019.01.003
PMID:30832933
Abstract

The current paper addresses the nature of epistemic injustice as it may be experienced by persons with dementia. We describe how theoretical models of stigma align with the current model of epistemic injustice through a consideration of the concepts of 'stereotype', 'prejudice' and 'discrimination', shared by the two models. We draw on current understandings of dementia-related stigma to expand understandings of the epistemic injustice faced by persons with dementia. We discuss how these insights may inform the development of mechanisms to uphold the basic human right to speak, to be heard, and to be believed for persons with dementia.

摘要

本文探讨了认知不公正的本质,这是痴呆症患者可能会经历的。我们通过考量两种模型共有的“刻板印象”“偏见”和“歧视”概念,描述了污名的理论模型如何与当前的认知不公正模型相契合。我们借鉴当前对痴呆症相关污名的理解,以拓展对痴呆症患者所面临的认知不公正的认识。我们讨论了这些见解如何为维护痴呆症患者表达、被倾听和被信任的基本人权的机制发展提供参考。

相似文献

1
Expanding current understandings of epistemic injustice and dementia: Learning from stigma theory.拓展当前对认知不公正与痴呆症的理解:借鉴污名理论
J Aging Stud. 2019 Mar;48:76-84. doi: 10.1016/j.jaging.2019.01.003. Epub 2019 Feb 1.
2
Epistemic injustice in assessment of delusions.妄想评估中的认知不公正。
J Eval Clin Pract. 2015 Jun;21(3):479-85. doi: 10.1111/jep.12347. Epub 2015 Mar 31.
3
Epistemic injustice in dementia and autism patient organizations: An empirical analysis.痴呆症和自闭症患者组织中的认知不公正:一项实证分析。
AJOB Empir Bioeth. 2017 Oct-Dec;8(4):221-233. doi: 10.1080/23294515.2017.1402833. Epub 2017 Dec 5.
4
Unravelling epistemic injustice in medical education: The case of the underperforming learner.揭开医学教育中的认识不公:表现不佳的学习者案例。
Med Educ. 2024 Nov;58(11):1286-1295. doi: 10.1111/medu.15410. Epub 2024 Apr 27.
5
Epistemic struggles: The role of advocacy in promoting epistemic justice and rights in mental health.认知斗争:倡导在促进心理健康中的认知正义和权利中的作用。
Soc Sci Med. 2018 Dec;219:36-44. doi: 10.1016/j.socscimed.2018.10.003. Epub 2018 Oct 10.
6
Stigma, epistemic injustice, and "looked after children": The need for a new language.污名化、认识正义缺失与“受照料儿童”:需要新的语言。
J Eval Clin Pract. 2022 Oct;28(5):867-874. doi: 10.1111/jep.13700. Epub 2022 May 22.
7
Investigating Trust, Expertise, and Epistemic Injustice in Chronic Pain.探究慢性疼痛中的信任、专业知识与认知不公正
J Bioeth Inq. 2017 Mar;14(1):31-42. doi: 10.1007/s11673-016-9761-x. Epub 2016 Dec 22.
8
Epistemic injustice and responsibility in borderline personality disorder.边缘型人格障碍中的认知不公正与责任
J Eval Clin Pract. 2017 Oct;23(5):974-980. doi: 10.1111/jep.12609. Epub 2016 Aug 4.
9
A call to action: Managing the neural pathway of disgust, bias, prejudice, and discrimination that fuels stigma.行动呼吁:管理厌恶、偏见、歧视和污名化的神经通路。
Subst Abus. 2018;39(4):399-403. doi: 10.1080/08897077.2019.1576091.
10
Mental Health Experts as Objects of Epistemic Injustice-The Case of Autism Spectrum Condition.作为认知不公正对象的心理健康专家——以自闭症谱系障碍为例
Diagnostics (Basel). 2023 Mar 1;13(5):927. doi: 10.3390/diagnostics13050927.

引用本文的文献

1
Within My Walls, I Escape Being Underestimated: A Systematic Review and Thematic Synthesis of Stigma and Help-Seeking in Dementia.在我的壁垒之内,我免受被低估之苦:痴呆症耻辱感与求助行为的系统评价和主题综合分析
Behav Sci (Basel). 2025 Jun 3;15(6):774. doi: 10.3390/bs15060774.
2
That was just your life: rethinking dementia for advance directives.那就是你的生活:为预先指示重新思考痴呆症。
Front Psychiatry. 2024 Jul 29;15:1435560. doi: 10.3389/fpsyt.2024.1435560. eCollection 2024.
3
Experiences of stigma and discrimination among people living with dementia and family carers in Brazil: Qualitative study.
巴西痴呆症患者及其家庭护理人员遭受污名化和歧视的经历:定性研究。
Ageing Soc. 2023 Feb;43(2):447-468. doi: 10.1017/s0144686x21000660. Epub 2021 May 20.
4
The development and validation of the Discrimination and Stigma Scale Ultra Short for People Living with Dementia (DISCUS-Dementia).痴呆症患者歧视与污名超短量表(DISCUS-Dementia)的开发与验证
BJPsych Open. 2023 Aug 31;9(5):e164. doi: 10.1192/bjo.2023.551.
5
Epistemic Injustice in Late-Stage Dementia: A Case for Non-Verbal Testimonial Injustice.晚期痴呆症中的认知不公正:非言语证言不公正之情形
Soc Epistemol. 2022 Sep 20;37(1):62-79. doi: 10.1080/02691728.2022.2103474. eCollection 2023.
6
Worldwide impact of lifestyle predictors of dementia prevalence: An eXplainable Artificial Intelligence analysis.痴呆症患病率生活方式预测因素的全球影响:可解释人工智能分析
Front Big Data. 2022 Dec 8;5:1027783. doi: 10.3389/fdata.2022.1027783. eCollection 2022.
7
A stigmatizing dilemma in the labour room: Irrationality or selfishness?产房里令人感到羞耻的困境:不合理还是自私?
J Eval Clin Pract. 2022 Oct;28(5):875-882. doi: 10.1111/jep.13747. Epub 2022 Aug 1.