• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

经直肠前列腺穿刺活检经典方法与再次活检中认知配准的比较。

Comparison of classical transrectal prostate biopsy versus cognitive registration in rebiopsy.

作者信息

Barbas Bernardos G, Herranz Amo F, de Miguel Campos E, Luis Cardo A, Herranz Arriero A, Cancho Gil M J, Caño Velasco J, Jara Rascón J, Mayor de Castro J, Hernández Fernández C

机构信息

Servicio de Urología, Hospital General Universitario Gregorio Marañón. Facultad de Medicina, Universidad Complutense (UCM), Madrid, España.

Servicio de Urología, Hospital General Universitario Gregorio Marañón. Facultad de Medicina, Universidad Complutense (UCM), Madrid, España.

出版信息

Actas Urol Esp (Engl Ed). 2019 Jun;43(5):228-233. doi: 10.1016/j.acuro.2018.06.010. Epub 2019 Mar 1.

DOI:10.1016/j.acuro.2018.06.010
PMID:30833102
Abstract

INTRODUCTION

The aim of this study is to compare performance of two biopsy approaches in patients with at least one previous negative prostate biopsy (PB): classical transrectal biopsy (ClTB) versus cognitive registration biopsy (COG-TB).

MATERIAL AND METHODS

A retrospective study of 205 patients with at least one negative PB. 144 (70.2%) patients underwent a prior mpMRI and 61 (29.8%) patients did not. Nodule classification was carried out according PI-RADS version 2. Peripheral zone (PZ) grouped pZa, pZpl and pZpm areas, transition zone (TZ) Tza, Tzp and Cz areas, and anterior zone (AZ) AS areas. COG-TB was conducted in patients with previous mpMRI (144); while in the remaining 61 (29.8%) patients a ClTB of PZ and TZ was performed. Statistical analysis was performed using Chi square and T-student tests for qualitative and quantitative variables, respectively. Multivariate analysis was carried out in order to identify predictive variables of prostate cancer.

RESULTS

Median patient age was 68 (IQR 62-72) years, median PSA was 8.3 (IQR 6.2-11.7) ng/ml and median previous biopsies was 1 (IQR 1-2). Digital rectal examinations (DRE) findings were normal in 169 (82.4%) patients and suspicious in 36 (17.6%) patients (cT2a-b in 34 patients and cT2c in 2). Median prostate volume was 48 (IQR 38-65) cc. Statistically significant differences in PSAD between both groups were found (P=.03). Transrectal ultrasound (TRUS) showed hypoechoic nodules in 8 (13.1%) ClTB patients and in 62 (43.1%) COG-TB patients (P=.0001). The median number of biopsy cylinders per set of prostate biopsies was 10 (IQR 10-10) in ClTB group and 11 (IQR 9-13) in COG-TB group (P=.75). Cancer was diagnosed in 74 (36.1%) patients: of them, 10 (16.4%) were ClTB patients and 64 (44.4%) COG-TB (P=.0001). Tumors classification was as follow: ISUP-1: 34 (45.9%), ISUP-2: 21 (28.4%), ISUP-3: 9 (12.2%), ISUP-4: 7 (9.5%) and ISUP-5: 3 (4.1%). No significant statistical differences were found (P=.89). The median number of biopsy cylinders impaired per set of prostate biopsies was 1 (IQR 1-5) in ClTB group and 2 (IQR 1-4) in COG-TB group (P=.93). Regarding independent predictive variables for prostate cancer the results were: age (OR=12.05; P=.049), suspicious DRE (OR=2.64; P=.04), hypoechoic nodule (OR=2.20; P=.03) and mpMRI +COG-TB sequence (OR=3.49; P=.003).

CONCLUSIONS

In patients with at least one negative PB, mpMRI +COG-TB sequence improves 3.5 (OR=3.49) times the diagnosis prostate vs. ClTB.

摘要

引言

本研究的目的是比较两种活检方法在至少有一次先前前列腺活检(PB)结果为阴性的患者中的表现:传统经直肠活检(ClTB)与认知配准活检(COG-TB)。

材料与方法

对205例至少有一次PB结果为阴性的患者进行回顾性研究。144例(70.2%)患者此前接受过mpMRI检查,61例(29.8%)患者未接受过。根据PI-RADS第2版进行结节分类。外周区(PZ)包括pZa、pZpl和pZpm区域,移行区(TZ)包括Tza、Tzp和Cz区域,前区(AZ)包括AS区域。对先前接受过mpMRI检查的患者(144例)进行COG-TB;而对其余61例(29.8%)患者进行PZ和TZ的ClTB。分别使用卡方检验和t检验对定性和定量变量进行统计分析。进行多变量分析以确定前列腺癌的预测变量。

结果

患者中位年龄为68岁(四分位间距62 - 72岁),中位前列腺特异抗原(PSA)为8.3 ng/ml(四分位间距6.2 - 11.7 ng/ml),先前活检的中位次数为1次(四分位间距1 - 2次)。169例(82.4%)患者的直肠指检(DRE)结果正常,36例(17.6%)患者可疑(34例为cT2a - b期,2例为cT2c期)。前列腺中位体积为48 cc(四分位间距38 - 65 cc)。两组间前列腺特异抗原密度(PSAD)存在统计学显著差异(P = 0.03)。经直肠超声(TRUS)显示,8例(13.1%)ClTB患者和62例(43.1%)COG-TB患者有低回声结节(P = 0.0001)。ClTB组每组前列腺活检的活检针数中位数为10根(四分位间距10 - 10根),COG-TB组为11根(四分位间距9 - 13根)(P = 0.75)。74例(36.1%)患者被诊断为癌症:其中,10例(16.4%)为ClTB患者,64例(44.4%)为COG-TB患者(P = 0.0001)。肿瘤分类如下:国际泌尿病理学会(ISUP)1级:34例(45.9%),ISUP 2级:21例(28.4%),ISUP 3级:9例(12.2%),ISUP 4级:7例(9.5%),ISUP 5级:3例(4.1%)。未发现显著统计学差异(P = 0.89)。ClTB组每组前列腺活检受损的活检针数中位数为1根(四分位间距1 - 5根),COG-TB组为2根(四分位间距1 - 4根)(P = 0.93)。关于前列腺癌的独立预测变量,结果如下:年龄(比值比[OR]=12.05;P = 0.049)、可疑DRE(OR = 2.64;P = 0.04)、低回声结节(OR = 2.20;P = 0.03)和mpMRI + COG-TB序列(OR = 3.49;P = 0.003)。

结论

在至少有一次PB结果为阴性的患者中,mpMRI + COG-TB序列诊断前列腺癌的能力是ClTB的3.5倍(OR = 3.49)。

相似文献

1
Comparison of classical transrectal prostate biopsy versus cognitive registration in rebiopsy.经直肠前列腺穿刺活检经典方法与再次活检中认知配准的比较。
Actas Urol Esp (Engl Ed). 2019 Jun;43(5):228-233. doi: 10.1016/j.acuro.2018.06.010. Epub 2019 Mar 1.
2
Effectiveness of the «cognitive» biopsy in the diagnosis of prostate cancer in patients with a previous negative biopsy.“认知”活检在既往活检阴性患者前列腺癌诊断中的有效性。
Actas Urol Esp (Engl Ed). 2019 Jan-Feb;43(1):12-17. doi: 10.1016/j.acuro.2018.06.008. Epub 2018 Aug 18.
3
A Prospective Comparison of Transrectal Standard, Cognitive, Transperineal Fusion, and Mapping Prostate Biopsy for Cancer Detection.经直肠标准、认知、经会阴融合和前列腺癌检测图谱活检的前瞻性比较。
J Endourol. 2023 Aug;37(8):940-947. doi: 10.1089/end.2022.0780. Epub 2023 Jun 27.
4
The FUTURE Trial: A Multicenter Randomised Controlled Trial on Target Biopsy Techniques Based on Magnetic Resonance Imaging in the Diagnosis of Prostate Cancer in Patients with Prior Negative Biopsies.FUTURE 试验:一项基于磁共振成像的靶向活检技术在既往阴性前列腺穿刺活检患者中诊断前列腺癌的多中心随机对照研究。
Eur Urol. 2019 Apr;75(4):582-590. doi: 10.1016/j.eururo.2018.11.040. Epub 2018 Dec 3.
5
Prevalence of Prostate Cancer in PI-RADS Version 2.1 Transition Zone Atypical Nodules Upgraded by Abnormal DWI: Correlation With MRI-Directed TRUS-Guided Targeted Biopsy.PI-RADS v2.1 版中通过异常扩散加权成像升级的前列腺移行区非典型结节的前列腺癌患病率:与MRI引导下TRUS引导的靶向活检的相关性
AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2021 Mar;216(3):683-690. doi: 10.2214/AJR.20.23932. Epub 2021 Jan 21.
6
MRI-targeted or systematic random biopsies for prostate cancer diagnosis in biopsy naïve patients: follow-up of a PRECISION trial-like retrospective cohort.MRI 靶向或系统随机活检在初次活检前列腺癌患者中的诊断作用:一项类似 PRECISION 试验的回顾性队列研究随访。
Prostate Cancer Prostatic Dis. 2021 Jun;24(2):406-413. doi: 10.1038/s41391-020-00290-4. Epub 2020 Sep 28.
7
"In-bore" MRI prostate biopsy is a safe preoperative clinical tool to exclude significant prostate cancer in symptomatic patients with benign prostatic obstruction before transurethral laser enucleation.“腔内”MRI前列腺活检是一种安全的术前临床工具,用于在经尿道激光剜除术前排除有良性前列腺梗阻症状的患者是否患有严重前列腺癌。
Arch Ital Urol Androl. 2020 Jan 14;91(4):224-229. doi: 10.4081/aiua.2019.4.224.
8
Can preoperative multiparametric MRI avoid unnecessary prostate biopsies before holmium laser enucleation of the prostate? Preliminary results of a multicentric cohort of patients.术前多参数磁共振成像能否避免前列腺钬激光剜除术前不必要的前列腺活检?多中心患者队列的初步结果。
Minerva Urol Nefrol. 2019 Oct;71(5):524-530. doi: 10.23736/S0393-2249.19.03463-5. Epub 2019 Jun 4.
9
Cognitive versus Software-Assisted Registration: Development of a New Nomogram Predicting Prostate Cancer at MRI-Targeted Biopsies.认知配准与软件辅助配准:开发一种新的列线图预测 MRI 靶向活检前列腺癌。
Clin Genitourin Cancer. 2018 Aug;16(4):e953-e960. doi: 10.1016/j.clgc.2018.03.013. Epub 2018 Apr 3.
10
Comparing Three Different Techniques for Magnetic Resonance Imaging-targeted Prostate Biopsies: A Systematic Review of In-bore versus Magnetic Resonance Imaging-transrectal Ultrasound fusion versus Cognitive Registration. Is There a Preferred Technique?比较三种不同的磁共振成像靶向前列腺活检技术:腔内与磁共振成像-经直肠超声融合与认知配准的系统评价。哪种技术更优?
Eur Urol. 2017 Apr;71(4):517-531. doi: 10.1016/j.eururo.2016.07.041. Epub 2016 Aug 25.