Suppr超能文献

七氟烷和丙泊酚对猪心脏传导系统的不同影响。

Differential effects of sevoflurane and propofol on swine cardiac conduction system.

作者信息

Zaballos Matilde, Del Blanco Brezo, Sevilla Raul, De Diego Carlos, Anadon Ma José, Jimeno Concepción, Almendral Jesús

机构信息

Department of Toxicology, Complutense University, Madrid, Spain; Department of Anaesthesiology, Hospital Universitario Gregorio Marañón, Madrid, Spain.

Department of Anaesthesiology, Hospital Clínico San Carlos, Madrid, Spain.

出版信息

Vet Anaesth Analg. 2019 May;46(3):344-351. doi: 10.1016/j.vaa.2018.11.007. Epub 2019 Jan 26.

Abstract

OBJECTIVE

To compare the effects of sevoflurane and propofol on the porcine cardiac conduction system.

STUDY DESIGN

A prospective, comparative study of electrophysiological properties of anaesthetics agents in an experimental porcine model.

ANIMALS

A total of 36 hybrid Landrace-Large White pigs.

METHODS

After premedication with 20 mg kg of intramuscular ketamine, anaesthesia was induced with 4.5 mg kgpropofol intravenously. In 18 consecutive animals, anaesthesia was maintained with propofol (13 mg kg hour) and in the remaining 18 animals with 2.66% sevoflurane. The femoral artery and vein were canalized for invasive monitoring, analytical blood gas sampling and intracardiac catheter insertion. Following instrumentation and after a period of stabilization, a customary electrophysiological evaluation was performed. We compared the electrophysiology of the sinus and atrioventricular node (AV) node under sevoflurane or propofol anaesthesia, and the effects of both anaesthetics on atrial and ventricular refractoriness.

RESULTS

There was a significant difference in sinus node recovery time between sevoflurane and propofol (907 ± 231 versus 753 ± 146 ms, p = 0.02). Sevoflurane in comparison with propofol significantly prolonged specialized AV conduction times, represented by an increased Wenckebach cycle length (272 ± 54 versus 235 ± 40 ms, p = 0.03) and AV nodal refractoriness (327 ± 34 versus 287 ± 30 ms, p = 0.002). In addition, sevoflurane prolonged ventricular refractoriness (298 ± 27 versus 255 ± 38 ms, p = 0.007) and the QT corrected interval (0.50 ± 0.05 versus 0.46 ± 0.09 ms, p = 0.005).

CONCLUSIONS AND CLINICAL RELEVANCE

Sevoflurane in comparison with propofol, depresses several parameters of sinus and AV nodal function and prolongs the ventricular refractoriness of the porcine cardiac conduction system. These findings should be taken into consideration for the choice of anaesthetic agents in clinical and experimental settings.

摘要

目的

比较七氟醚和丙泊酚对猪心脏传导系统的影响。

研究设计

在实验猪模型中对麻醉剂电生理特性进行的前瞻性比较研究。

动物

总共36头长白-大白杂交猪。

方法

肌肉注射20mg/kg氯胺酮进行术前用药后,静脉注射4.5mg/kg丙泊酚诱导麻醉。在连续的18只动物中,用丙泊酚(13mg/kg·小时)维持麻醉,其余18只动物用2.66%七氟醚维持麻醉。将股动脉和股静脉插管用于有创监测、分析性血气采样和心内导管插入。在仪器安装完成并经过一段时间的稳定后,进行常规的电生理评估。我们比较了七氟醚或丙泊酚麻醉下窦房结和房室结(AV)的电生理,以及两种麻醉剂对心房和心室不应期的影响。

结果

七氟醚和丙泊酚之间的窦房结恢复时间有显著差异(907±231对753±146毫秒,p = 0.02)。与丙泊酚相比,七氟醚显著延长了特殊房室传导时间,表现为文氏周期长度增加(272±54对235±40毫秒,p = 0.03)和房室结不应期(327±34对287±30毫秒,p = 0.002)。此外,七氟醚延长了心室不应期(298±27对255±38毫秒,p = 0.007)和校正QT间期(0.50±0.05对0.46±0.09毫秒,p = 0.005)。

结论及临床意义

与丙泊酚相比,七氟醚抑制了窦房结和房室结功能的几个参数,并延长了猪心脏传导系统的心室不应期。在临床和实验环境中选择麻醉剂时应考虑这些发现。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验