Division of Pulmonary and Critical Care Medicine, Department of Internal Medicine, Seoul National University Bundang Hospital, Seongnam-si, Gyeonggi-do, Republic of Korea.
Department of Nursing, Seoul National University Bundang Hospital, Seongnam, Gyeonggi-do, Republic of Korea.
PLoS One. 2019 Mar 5;14(3):e0213146. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0213146. eCollection 2019.
This study aimed to determine the occurrence rate and risk factors of cardiopulmonary arrest (CPA) during intra-hospital transport (IHT) among critically ill patients, accompanied by a rapid response team (RRT).
We performed a retrospective cohort study in a 1300-bed tertiary-care teaching hospital. Data of all admitted patients transported within the hospital and accompanied by the RRT from October 2012 to May 2016 were included. We compared patients with CPA (+) and patients without CPA (-) to identify risk factors for CPA during transport.
Among 535 patients, CPA occurred in eight (1.5%) patients during IHT. There were no significant differences in age, sex, and comorbidities between groups. More patients in the CPA (+) group than in the CPA (-) group received manual ventilation during IHT (75% vs. 23.0%, p = 0.001). An increased risk of CPA (p<0.001) corresponded with a higher number of vasopressors used during IHT. In univariate logistic regression analysis, history of myocardial infarction (OR 10.7, 95% CI 2.4-50.5, p = 0.005), manual ventilation (OR 10.1, 95% CI 2.0-50.5, p = 0.005), and use of three or more vasopressors (OR 11.1, 95% CI 2.5-48.9, p = 0.001) were significantly associated with risk of CPA during RRT-led IHT.
Despite accompaniment by a specialized team such as the RRT, CPA can occur during IHT. History of myocardial infarction, manual ventilation with bag-valve mask, and the use of three or more vasopressors were independent risk factors of CPA during IHT of critically ill patients accompanied by the RRT.
本研究旨在确定伴有快速反应团队(RRT)的危重病患者院内转运(IHT)期间心搏骤停(CPA)的发生率和危险因素。
我们在一家拥有 1300 张床位的三级教学医院进行了回顾性队列研究。纳入 2012 年 10 月至 2016 年 5 月期间由 RRT 陪同在医院内转运的所有入院患者的数据。我们将有 CPA(+)的患者和没有 CPA(-)的患者进行比较,以确定转运期间发生 CPA 的危险因素。
在 535 例患者中,有 8 例(1.5%)在 IHT 期间发生 CPA。两组间在年龄、性别和合并症方面无显著差异。在 IHT 期间接受手动通气的患者中,CPA(+)组多于 CPA(-)组(75% vs. 23.0%,p = 0.001)。CPA 的风险增加(p<0.001)与 IHT 期间使用的血管加压药数量增加相关。在单变量逻辑回归分析中,心肌梗死史(OR 10.7,95%CI 2.4-50.5,p = 0.005)、手动通气(OR 10.1,95%CI 2.0-50.5,p = 0.005)和使用三或更多血管加压药(OR 11.1,95%CI 2.5-48.9,p = 0.001)与 RRT 领导的 IHT 期间发生 CPA 的风险显著相关。
尽管有专门的团队(如 RRT)陪同,CPA 仍可在 IHT 期间发生。心肌梗死史、带囊面罩通气和使用三或更多血管加压药是 RRT 陪同的危重病患者 IHT 期间发生 CPA 的独立危险因素。