Suppr超能文献

射频消融与重复手术治疗局部复发性甲状腺癌的疗效和并发症比较:一项单中心倾向评分匹配研究。

Comparison of efficacy and complications between radiofrequency ablation and repeat surgery in the treatment of locally recurrent thyroid cancers: a single-center propensity score matching study.

机构信息

a Department of Radiology , The Catholic University of Korea College of Medicine, Seoul St. Mary's Hospital , Seoul , Korea.

b Department of Thyroid Surgery , The Catholic University of Korea College of Medicine, Seoul St. Mary's Hospital , Seoul , Korea.

出版信息

Int J Hyperthermia. 2019;36(1):359-367. doi: 10.1080/02656736.2019.1571248. Epub 2019 Mar 5.

Abstract

PURPOSE

To compare the efficacy and complication rates of radiofrequency ablation (RFA) and repeat surgery in the treatment of locally recurrent thyroid cancers.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

A total of 221 patients with locally recurrent thyroid cancers who underwent either RFA (n = 96) or repeat surgery (n = 125) between March 2008 and March 2017 were retrospectively enrolled (range of follow-up, 1-10 years). Each cohort consisted of 70 patients after propensity score adjustment. Patients with more than three recurrent lesions were excluded. The primary and secondary end points were recurrence-free survival and complication rates, respectively. Recurrence-free survival curves were compared via the log-rank test. The complications-voice changes, hypocalcemia, and immediate procedural complications-were compared between the groups. In addition, pretreatment serum thyroglobulin (T) levels and those at the last follow-up were also compared between the two groups to examine therapeutic efficacy.

RESULTS

After propensity score matching, both groups showed no significant differences in baseline characteristics. The recurrence-free survival rates were comparable between the RFA and surgery groups (p = .2). There were no significant differences in mean serum T levels and their mean decrease after treatment between the groups (p = .891 and p = .963, respectively). Immediate procedural complications and voice changes also showed no significant between-group differences (p = .316, p = .084, respectively). Hypocalcemia occurred only in the repeat surgery group (n = 18). Overall complications were significantly more frequent in the repeat surgery group (RFA, n = 7; surgery, n = 27; p < .001).

CONCLUSION

RFA may be an effective and safe alternative to repeat surgery in the treatment of a small number of locally recurrent thyroid cancers.

摘要

目的

比较射频消融(RFA)和重复手术治疗局部复发性甲状腺癌的疗效和并发症发生率。

材料和方法

回顾性纳入 2008 年 3 月至 2017 年 3 月期间接受 RFA(n=96)或重复手术(n=125)治疗的 221 例局部复发性甲状腺癌患者(随访时间 1-10 年)。每个队列均经倾向评分调整后包含 70 例患者。排除有 3 个以上复发病灶的患者。主要终点为无复发生存率,次要终点为并发症发生率。通过对数秩检验比较无复发生存曲线。比较两组间的并发症(声音改变、低钙血症和即刻手术并发症)。此外,还比较了两组间治疗前后的血清甲状腺球蛋白(T)水平,以评估治疗效果。

结果

经倾向评分匹配后,两组的基线特征无显著差异。RFA 组和手术组的无复发生存率无显著差异(p=0.2)。两组间的平均血清 T 水平及其治疗后平均下降值无显著差异(p=0.891 和 p=0.963)。即刻手术并发症和声音改变也无显著组间差异(p=0.316,p=0.084)。仅在重复手术组中出现低钙血症(n=18)。重复手术组的总并发症发生率明显高于 RFA 组(RFA 组:n=7;手术组:n=27;p<0.001)。

结论

RFA 可能是治疗少数局部复发性甲状腺癌的一种有效且安全的替代方法。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验