a Division of Interventional Ultrasound , The First Affiliated Hospital of Sun Yat-sen University , Guangzhou , China.
b Department of Oncology , The First Affiliated Hospital of Sun Yat-sen University , Guangzhou , China.
Int J Hyperthermia. 2018 Nov;34(7):1029-1037. doi: 10.1080/02656736.2017.1387941. Epub 2017 Nov 16.
To retrospectively compare the efficacy and safety of combined radiofrequency ablation and percutaneous ethanol injection (RFA-PEI) with repeat hepatectomy for elderly patients with initial recurrent hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) after hepatic surgery.
From January 2009 to June 2015, 105 elderly patients (≥70 years) who underwent RFA-PEI (n = 57) or repeated hepatectomy (n = 48) for recurrent HCC ≤ 5.0 cm were included in the study. The overall survival (OS) and recurrence-free survival (RFS) were analysed with the Kaplan-Meier method and compared by the log-rank test. Non-tumour-related death, complications and hospital stays were assessed. Univariate and multivariate analyses were performed to identify the prognostic significance of the variables in predicting the OS and RFS.
OS rates were 78.2%, 40.8% and 36.7% at 1, 3 and 5 years after RFA-PEI and 76.3%, 52.5% and 42.6% after repeat hepatectomy, respectively (p = 0.413). Correspondingly, the 1-, 3- and 5-year RFS rates after RFA-PEI and repeat hepatectomy were 69.5%, 37.8%, 33.1% and 73.1%, 49.7%, 40.7%, respectively (p = 0.465). Non-tumour-related deaths in the RFA-PEI group (2/57) were significantly fewer than those in the repeat hepatectomy group (10/48) (p = 0.016). RFA-PEI was superior to repeat hepatectomy regarding the major complication rates and length of in-hospital stay (both p < 0.001). Multivariate analysis showed that the tumour number was the significant prognostic factor for the OS (hazard ratio (HR) = 1.961, 95% CI = 1.043-3.686, p = 0.037) and RFS (HR = 1.866, 95% CI = 1.064-3.274, p = 0.030).
RFA-PEI provides comparable OS and RFS to repeat hepatectomy for elderly patients with small recurrent HCC after hepatectomy but with fewer non-tumour-related deaths, major complications and shorter hospital stays.
回顾性比较射频消融联合经皮乙醇注射(RFA-PEI)与重复肝切除术治疗肝切除术后初发复发性肝细胞癌(HCC)老年患者的疗效和安全性。
2009 年 1 月至 2015 年 6 月,对 105 例接受 RFA-PEI(n=57)或重复肝切除术(n=48)治疗的复发性 HCC≤5.0cm 的老年患者(≥70 岁)进行了回顾性分析。采用 Kaplan-Meier 法分析总生存期(OS)和无复发生存期(RFS),并采用对数秩检验进行比较。评估非肿瘤相关死亡、并发症和住院时间。采用单因素和多因素分析确定预测 OS 和 RFS 的变量的预后意义。
RFA-PEI 组 1、3、5 年 OS 率分别为 78.2%、40.8%和 36.7%,重复肝切除术组分别为 76.3%、52.5%和 42.6%(p=0.413)。相应地,RFA-PEI 组和重复肝切除术组 1、3、5 年 RFS 率分别为 69.5%、37.8%、33.1%和 73.1%、49.7%、40.7%(p=0.465)。RFA-PEI 组(2/57)非肿瘤相关死亡人数明显少于重复肝切除术组(10/48)(p=0.016)。RFA-PEI 在主要并发症发生率和住院时间方面均优于重复肝切除术(均 p<0.001)。多因素分析显示,肿瘤数目是影响 OS(风险比(HR)=1.961,95%可信区间(CI)=1.043-3.686,p=0.037)和 RFS(HR=1.866,95%CI=1.064-3.274,p=0.030)的显著预后因素。
对于肝切除术后复发的小 HCC 老年患者,RFA-PEI 提供了与重复肝切除术相当的 OS 和 RFS,但非肿瘤相关死亡率、主要并发症和住院时间更少。