• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

Bowel Preparation for Colonoscopy in Children: 1 Day PEG-3350 with Bisacodyl versus 3 Day Sennosides.

作者信息

Tutar Engin, Bayrak Nevzat Aykut, Volkan Burcu, Ertem Deniz

机构信息

Division of Pediatric Gastroenterology, Hepatology and Nutrition, Marmara University School of Medicine, Istanbul, Turkey.

Division of Pediatric Gastroenterology, Hepatology and Nutrition, Marmara University School of Medicine, Istanbul, Turkey,

出版信息

Dig Dis. 2019;37(4):334-342. doi: 10.1159/000497819. Epub 2019 Mar 5.

DOI:10.1159/000497819
PMID:30836366
Abstract

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES

Bowel preparation (BP) for colonoscopy is a challenging procedure in children and different regimens have been used for this purpose. Polyethylene glycol (PEG) is the most preferred agent in recent years. The primary aim of this study was to evaluate the efficacy of 1-day PEG-3350 with bisacodyl (PEG-B) and comparing it with 3-day sennosides A+B.

METHOD

In this prospective, randomized, and single-blinded study, children aged 2-18 years were included in the PEG-B group for 1 day or in Senna group for 3 days. The effectiveness of BP was assessed according to the Ottawa and Boston BP scales, compliance and adverse effects were also recorded. Pre- and post-preparation biochemistry were obtained for investigation of safety of both regimens.

RESULTS

Successful BP was observed in 88.3% (n = 53/60) of PEG-B and 86% (n = 55/64) of Senna groups according to Boston scale, and it was 85% (n = 51/60) and 84.4% (n = 54/64), respectively, according to Ottawa scale. The cecal intubation rate was 96.7% (n = 58/60) in the PEG-B group and 93.8% (n = 60/64) in the Senna group. Ease of administration and disturbance in regular daily activities was better in the PEG-B group (p < 0.05). There was no major adverse event and biochemical abnormality in both groups. The correlation between Ottawa and Boston scales was found to be excellent (r2 = -0.954, p < 0.01).

CONCLUSIONS

The efficacy, safety, and adverse effect profile of 1-day BP with PEG-B regimen was found to be similar to 3-day sennosides regimen, however, the PEG-B regimen had advantages such as short duration, ease of administration, and better patient comfort. Also, high correlation rate between the Boston and Ottawa scales in pediatric patients was remarkable.

摘要

相似文献

1
Bowel Preparation for Colonoscopy in Children: 1 Day PEG-3350 with Bisacodyl versus 3 Day Sennosides.
Dig Dis. 2019;37(4):334-342. doi: 10.1159/000497819. Epub 2019 Mar 5.
2
High- versus low-volume polyethylene glycol plus laxative versus sennosides for colonoscopy preparation in children.高容量与低容量聚乙二醇加轻泻药与番泻叶对比用于儿童结肠镜准备。
J Pediatr Gastroenterol Nutr. 2013 Aug;57(2):230-5. doi: 10.1097/MPG.0b013e3182950ef5.
3
Efficacy and Safety of Sodium Picosulfate/Magnesium Citrate for Bowel Preparation in a Physically Disabled Outpatient Population: A Randomized, Endoscopist-Blinded Comparison With Ascorbic Acid-Enriched Polyethylene Glycol Solution Plus Bisacodyl (The PICO-MOVI Study).在身体残疾的门诊人群中,以聚乙二醇电解质溶液联合比沙可啶作为对照,评价匹可硫酸钠/柠檬酸镁进行肠道准备的疗效和安全性:一项随机、内镜医师设盲比较的研究(PICO-MOVI 研究)。
Dis Colon Rectum. 2018 Feb;61(2):239-249. doi: 10.1097/DCR.0000000000000956.
4
Polyethylene glycol versus split high-dose senna for bowel preparation: A comparative prospective randomized study.聚乙二醇与分段高剂量番泻叶用于肠道准备的比较:一项前瞻性随机对照研究。
J Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2020 Nov;35(11):1923-1929. doi: 10.1111/jgh.15101. Epub 2020 Jun 8.
5
2-Litre polyethylene glycol-citrate-simethicone plus bisacodyl versus 4-litre polyethylene glycol as preparation for colonoscopy in chronic constipation.2升聚乙二醇-柠檬酸盐-西甲硅油加比沙可啶与4升聚乙二醇用于慢性便秘患者结肠镜检查前的肠道准备比较
Dig Liver Dis. 2015 Oct;47(10):857-63. doi: 10.1016/j.dld.2015.06.008. Epub 2015 Jul 6.
6
A Multicenter Randomized Controlled Trial Comparing Two Bowel Cleansing Regimens for Colonoscopy After Failed Bowel Preparation.多中心随机对照试验比较两种结肠镜检查前肠道准备失败后的肠道清洁方案。
Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2022 Jun;20(6):e1283-e1291. doi: 10.1016/j.cgh.2021.07.015. Epub 2021 Jul 10.
7
Split-dose administration of a dual-action, low-volume bowel cleanser for colonoscopy: the SEE CLEAR I study.分剂量给予双重作用、低容量肠道清洁剂用于结肠镜检查:SEE CLEAR I 研究。
Gastrointest Endosc. 2013 Jul;78(1):132-41. doi: 10.1016/j.gie.2013.02.024. Epub 2013 Apr 6.
8
Same-day colonoscopy preparation with Senna alkaloids and bisacodyl tablets: a pilot study.番泻叶生物碱与比沙可啶片用于结肠镜检查当日准备:一项试点研究。
World J Gastroenterol. 2014 Nov 7;20(41):15382-6. doi: 10.3748/wjg.v20.i41.15382.
9
Comparison of one and two-day bowel preparation with polyethylene glycol in pediatric colonoscopy.聚乙二醇用于儿科结肠镜检查时一日与两日肠道准备的比较
Turk J Gastroenterol. 2015 May;26(3):232-5. doi: 10.5152/tjg.2015.6837.
10
Comparison of a split-dose bowel preparation with 2 liters of polyethylene glycol plus ascorbic acid and 1 liter of polyethylene glycol plus ascorbic acid and bisacodyl before colonoscopy.结肠镜检查前,对比 2 升聚乙二醇加维生素 C 与 1 升聚乙二醇加维生素 C 和比沙可啶的分剂量肠道准备。
Gastrointest Endosc. 2017 Aug;86(2):343-348. doi: 10.1016/j.gie.2016.10.040. Epub 2016 Nov 23.

引用本文的文献

1
Polyethylene Glycol Versus Senna for Bowel Preparation for Colonoscopy in Children: Updated Evidence by a Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.聚乙二醇与番泻叶用于儿童结肠镜检查肠道准备的比较:系统评价与荟萃分析的最新证据
Cureus. 2021 Sep 8;13(9):e17813. doi: 10.7759/cureus.17813. eCollection 2021 Sep.
2
Bowel Preparation for Pediatric Colonoscopy.小儿结肠镜检查的肠道准备
Front Pediatr. 2021 Sep 1;9:705624. doi: 10.3389/fped.2021.705624. eCollection 2021.
3
The Efficacy and Safety of Combined Senna and Probiotic-Based Bowel Preparation for Colonoscopy in Children.
番泻叶与益生菌联合用于儿童结肠镜检查肠道准备的有效性和安全性
Cureus. 2020 Sep 1;12(9):e10180. doi: 10.7759/cureus.10180.