Suppr超能文献

分剂量给予双重作用、低容量肠道清洁剂用于结肠镜检查:SEE CLEAR I 研究。

Split-dose administration of a dual-action, low-volume bowel cleanser for colonoscopy: the SEE CLEAR I study.

机构信息

Indiana University School of Medicine, Indianapolis, Indiana, USA.

出版信息

Gastrointest Endosc. 2013 Jul;78(1):132-41. doi: 10.1016/j.gie.2013.02.024. Epub 2013 Apr 6.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

New bowel cleansers for colonoscopy that lead to improved efficacy, safety, and tolerability are needed.

OBJECTIVE

This study evaluated a nonphosphate, dual-action, low-volume, orange-flavored preparation containing sodium picosulfate and magnesium citrate (P/MC).

DESIGN

Multicenter, assessor-blinded, randomized, noninferiority study.

SETTING

University hospitals, academic medical centers, and private clinics across the United States.

PATIENTS

Adults preparing for colonoscopy.

INTERVENTIONS

P/MC versus 2 L of polyethylene glycol solution (2L PEG-3350) and two 5-mg bisacodyl tablets.

MAIN OUTCOME MEASUREMENTS

This phase 3 study investigated the efficacy, safety, and tolerability of split-dose administration of P/MC versus day-before dosing of 2L PEG-3350 and two 5-mg bisacodyl tablets (SEE CLEAR I study). Efficacy was evaluated by using the Aronchick and Ottawa scales; noninferiority and superiority analyses were performed. Safety was assessed by monitoring adverse events (AEs). Tolerability was measured via a patient questionnaire.

RESULTS

The intent-to-treat population consisted of 601 patients who self-administered P/MC (n = 304) or 2L PEG-3350 and bisacodyl tablets (n = 297). P/MC was superior to 2L PEG-3350 and bisacodyl tablets in overall colon cleansing (84.2% vs 74.4%; 1-sided 97.5% confidence interval [CI], 3.4) (Aronchick scores of excellent or good) and in cleansing of the ascending (89.5% vs 78.8%; 1-sided 97.5% CI, 4.9), mid (transverse and descending) (92.4% vs 85.9%; 1-sided 97.5% CI, 1.6), and rectosigmoid (92.4% vs 87.2%; 1-sided 97.5% CI, 0.4) segments of the colon (Ottawa scores of excellent, good, or fair). Commonly reported AEs related to the bowel preparations were nausea, vomiting, headache, and chills. Patient-reported tolerability, including ease of consumption and taste, was significantly higher for P/MC than 2L PEG-3350 and bisacodyl tablets (P < .0001).

LIMITATIONS

Because of differences in administration and volume of the bowel preparations, the study was designed to be a single-assessor, blinded study.

CONCLUSIONS

The bowel-cleansing effects and patient acceptability of split-dose P/MC were superior to day-before dosing with 2L PEG-3350 and bisacodyl tablets.

摘要

背景

需要开发新的结肠镜检查用肠道清洁剂,以提高疗效、安全性和耐受性。

目的

本研究评估了一种非磷酸盐、双重作用、低容量、含柠檬味的匹可硫酸钠和柠檬酸镁(P/MC)制剂。

设计

多中心、评估者设盲、随机、非劣效性研究。

地点

美国的大学医院、学术医疗中心和私人诊所。

患者

准备行结肠镜检查的成年人。

干预措施

P/MC 与 2 L 聚乙二醇溶液(2L PEG-3350)和两片 5mg 比沙可啶相比。

主要结局测量

本 3 期研究评估了 P/MC 分剂量给药与 2L PEG-3350 和两片 5mg 比沙可啶(SEE CLEAR I 研究)的前一天给药相比的疗效、安全性和耐受性。采用 Aronchick 和渥太华评分评估疗效;进行非劣效性和优效性分析。通过监测不良事件(AE)评估安全性。通过患者问卷评估耐受性。

结果

意向治疗人群包括 601 名自行使用 P/MC(n=304)或 2L PEG-3350 和比沙可啶片剂(n=297)的患者。P/MC 在总体结肠清洁度方面优于 2L PEG-3350 和比沙可啶片剂(84.2%比 74.4%;单侧 97.5%置信区间[CI],3.4)(Aronchick 评分优秀或良好),并且在升结肠(89.5%比 78.8%;单侧 97.5%CI,4.9)、中结肠(横结肠和降结肠)(92.4%比 85.9%;单侧 97.5%CI,1.6)和直肠乙状结肠(92.4%比 87.2%;单侧 97.5%CI,0.4)段的清洁度方面也更优(Ottawa 评分优秀、良好或可)。与肠道准备相关的常见报告 AEs 为恶心、呕吐、头痛和寒战。与 2L PEG-3350 和比沙可啶片剂相比,患者报告的 P/MC 耐受性,包括易于服用和口感,显著更高(P<0.0001)。

局限性

由于肠道准备的给药和容量不同,该研究设计为单评估者、盲法研究。

结论

P/MC 分剂量给药的肠道清洁效果和患者接受程度优于 2L PEG-3350 和比沙可啶片剂的前一天给药。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验