SWSA, University of Hong Kong, Hong Kong, China.
Transitional Justice Working Group, Seoul 03142, Korea.
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2019 Mar 4;16(5):783. doi: 10.3390/ijerph16050783.
Drawing on a new typology of intimate partner violence (IPV), this paper tests the relationship between indicators of totalitarian and anarchic IPV and child polyvictimization incidence and severity. The paper argues for and utilizes a quantitative approach to study polyvictimization severity. Polyvictimization is operationalized as a multiplicative relationship between physical abuse and neglect in a random sample of 204 children from Kyunggi province, South Korea. The indicator of totalitarian IPV significantly predicted polyvictimization severity and incidence even when a traditional measure of intimate terrorism was held constant. The indicator of anarchic IPV significantly predicted polyvictimization severity but not incidence when a traditional measure of intimate terrorism was held constant. Implications are discussed.
本研究借鉴一种新的亲密伴侣暴力(IPV)类型学,检验了极权主义和无政府主义 IPV 指标与儿童多重受害发生率和严重程度之间的关系。本文主张并采用定量方法来研究多重受害严重程度。在韩国京畿道的一个随机样本中,将身体虐待和忽视之间的乘法关系操作化为多重受害,该样本包括 204 名儿童。即使在固定亲密恐怖主义的传统衡量标准的情况下,极权主义 IPV 的指标也显著预测了多重受害的严重程度和发生率。当固定亲密恐怖主义的传统衡量标准时,无政府主义 IPV 的指标显著预测了多重受害的严重程度,但没有预测发生率。讨论了相关的影响。