• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

大面积烧伤患者的流行病学和预后:一项 2483 例多中心研究。

The epidemiology and prognosis of patients with massive burns: A multicenter study of 2483 cases.

机构信息

Department of Critical Care Medicine, Henan Provincial People's Hospital, Zhengzhou, China.

Department of Burns & Plastic Surgery, The Fourth Medical Center of Chinese PLA General Hospital, Beijing, China.

出版信息

Burns. 2019 May;45(3):705-716. doi: 10.1016/j.burns.2018.08.008. Epub 2019 Mar 2.

DOI:10.1016/j.burns.2018.08.008
PMID:30837206
Abstract

OBJECTIVE

Epidemiological features of massively burned patients in China remains unclear. This study was designed to investigate the epidemiological characteristics and evaluate the burn index (BI) and other risk factors associated with the prognosis of massively burned patients.

METHODS

Data of patients with ≥30% total body surface area burned admitted in 2014 were retrieved from 106 burn centers in the mainland of China. Information of epidemiological features and the outcome were collected for retrospective analysis.

RESULTS

A total of 2483 massively burned patients were included in this study, with a male-to-female ratio of 2.29:1, the mean age of 49.23±16.67 years, mean TBSA of 55.53±21.39% and the mean BI of 39.75±21.59. Scald accounted for 81.07% of the injuries in children, while flame accounted for 66.89% and 74.31% of the injuries in adults and seniors. Approximately 17.76% of the patients were admitted to the local burn center after 6h of injury, and the wound areas of 1154 (46.48%) patients were covered with folk remedies. The mortality was 9.79%, and the area under the receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve for BI was 0.941 (95% CI, 0.929-0.954). When the value of BI was above a threshold of 29 in the 0-14 years age group, 43.5 in the 15-59 years age group and 35.5 in the 60 years or older age group, the mortality increased significantly. Multivariate logistic regression analyses showed that the odds ratio (OR) of death increased 6% with an increase in the BI of 1.0. Patients older than 60 years, the admission time longer than 6h after-injury (adjusted OR, 1.797; 95% CI, 1.179-2.740; adjusted p<0.001), and patients with a combined inhalation injury (adjusted OR, 6.649; 95% CI, 4.517-9.789; adjusted p<0.000), were at higher risk of death.

CONCLUSIONS

There are etiological characteristics of the different age groups that should be considered for prevention. BI can be a reliable index of prognosis in severely burned patients. The results of the study showed that a large BI, elderly age, delayed admission after injury and combined inhalation injury are the main risk factors for extensively burned patients.

摘要

目的

中国大面积烧伤患者的流行病学特征尚不清楚。本研究旨在调查流行病学特征,并评估与大面积烧伤患者预后相关的烧伤指数(BI)和其他危险因素。

方法

从中国大陆 106 家烧伤中心检索了 2014 年入院时烧伤面积≥30%的患者数据。对流行病学特征和结局进行回顾性分析。

结果

本研究共纳入 2483 例大面积烧伤患者,男女比例为 2.29:1,平均年龄 49.23±16.67 岁,平均 TBSA 为 55.53±21.39%,BI 为 39.75±21.59。儿童烧伤中 81.07%为烫伤,成人和老年人中 66.89%和 74.31%为火焰伤。约 17.76%的患者在受伤后 6 小时内被送往当地烧伤中心,1154 例(46.48%)患者的创面覆盖了民间偏方。死亡率为 9.79%,BI 的受试者工作特征(ROC)曲线下面积为 0.941(95%CI,0.929-0.954)。在 0-14 岁年龄组中,BI 值超过 29 时,在 15-59 岁年龄组中,BI 值超过 43.5,在 60 岁或以上年龄组中,BI 值超过 35.5 时,死亡率显著增加。多因素 logistic 回归分析显示,BI 每增加 1.0,死亡的比值比(OR)增加 6%。年龄大于 60 岁、受伤后入院时间大于 6 小时(调整 OR,1.797;95%CI,1.179-2.740;调整 p<0.001),以及合并吸入性损伤(调整 OR,6.649;95%CI,4.517-9.789;调整 p<0.000)的患者死亡风险更高。

结论

不同年龄组有不同的病因特征,应考虑预防。BI 可以作为严重烧伤患者预后的可靠指标。研究结果表明,大 BI、高龄、伤后延迟入院和合并吸入性损伤是大面积烧伤患者的主要危险因素。

相似文献

1
The epidemiology and prognosis of patients with massive burns: A multicenter study of 2483 cases.大面积烧伤患者的流行病学和预后:一项 2483 例多中心研究。
Burns. 2019 May;45(3):705-716. doi: 10.1016/j.burns.2018.08.008. Epub 2019 Mar 2.
2
Epidemiology and outcome analysis of burn patients admitted to an Intensive Care Unit in a University Hospital.某大学医院重症监护病房收治烧伤患者的流行病学及预后分析
Burns. 2016 May;42(3):655-62. doi: 10.1016/j.burns.2015.08.002. Epub 2016 Jan 4.
3
[An epidemiological investigation of pediatric patients under 14 with large area burns: a multicenter study].[14岁以下大面积烧伤患儿的流行病学调查:一项多中心研究]
Zhonghua Yi Xue Za Zhi. 2017 Feb 14;97(6):462-467. doi: 10.3760/cma.j.issn.0376-2491.2017.06.013.
4
Validation of the prognostic burn index: a nationwide retrospective study.预后烧伤指数的验证:一项全国性回顾性研究。
Burns. 2015 Sep;41(6):1169-75. doi: 10.1016/j.burns.2015.02.017. Epub 2015 Jun 26.
5
The measured effect magnitude of co-morbidities on burn injury mortality.共病对烧伤死亡率的测量效应量。
Burns. 2016 Nov;42(7):1433-1438. doi: 10.1016/j.burns.2016.03.007. Epub 2016 Sep 1.
6
Determination of risk factors for burn mortality based on a regional population study in Taiwan.基于台湾地区人群研究的烧伤死亡率危险因素判定
Burns. 2018 Sep;44(6):1591-1601. doi: 10.1016/j.burns.2018.02.030. Epub 2018 Apr 7.
7
Long term mortality in critically ill burn survivors.重症烧伤幸存者的长期死亡率。
Burns. 2017 Sep;43(6):1155-1162. doi: 10.1016/j.burns.2017.05.010. Epub 2017 Jun 9.
8
The epidemiologic characteristics and outcomes following intentional burn injury at a regional burn center.区域性烧伤中心故意烧伤后的流行病学特征和结局。
Burns. 2020 Mar;46(2):441-446. doi: 10.1016/j.burns.2019.08.002. Epub 2019 Aug 24.
9
The ABSI is dead, long live the ABSI - reliable prediction of survival in burns with a modified Abbreviated Burn Severity Index.ABSI 已死,ABSI 万岁——改良的简化烧伤严重度指数能可靠预测烧伤患者的生存情况。
Burns. 2020 Sep;46(6):1272-1279. doi: 10.1016/j.burns.2020.05.003. Epub 2020 May 19.
10
A novel mathematical model to predict prognosis of burnt patients based on logistic regression and support vector machine.一种基于逻辑回归和支持向量机预测烧伤患者预后的新型数学模型。
Burns. 2016 Mar;42(2):291-9. doi: 10.1016/j.burns.2015.08.009. Epub 2016 Jan 13.

引用本文的文献

1
Epidemiology and prognosis of burn injuries in China: a meta-analysis.中国烧伤损伤的流行病学与预后:一项荟萃分析。
Eur J Med Res. 2025 Jul 5;30(1):581. doi: 10.1186/s40001-025-02741-x.
2
Epidemiology and burden of pediatric burns in underdeveloped minority areas in Guangxi, China from 2014 to 2020: a retrospective study.2014年至2020年中国广西欠发达少数民族地区小儿烧伤的流行病学及负担:一项回顾性研究
Front Public Health. 2025 Jun 4;13:1566173. doi: 10.3389/fpubh.2025.1566173. eCollection 2025.
3
Smoke, Scars, and Survival: A Six-Year Analysis of Burn Mortality in a Resource-Limited Appalachian ICU.
烟雾、瘢痕与生存:对资源有限的阿巴拉契亚重症监护病房烧伤死亡率的六年分析
Cureus. 2025 Apr 13;17(4):e82199. doi: 10.7759/cureus.82199. eCollection 2025 Apr.
4
Current Status of Core Competencies of Chinese Nurses in Burn Departments: A Latent Profile Analysis.中国烧伤科护士核心能力现状:一项潜在剖面分析
J Nurs Manag. 2023 Apr 30;2023:8839286. doi: 10.1155/2023/8839286. eCollection 2023.
5
Epidemiological and clinical characteristics of severe burns in adults: A retrospective study at a burn centre in Suzhou, China.成人重度烧伤的流行病学和临床特征:中国苏州一家烧伤中心的回顾性研究。
Int Wound J. 2024 Dec;21(12):e70097. doi: 10.1111/iwj.70097.
6
Epidemiological and clinical characteristics of burns in adults: a 6-year retrospective study in a major burn center in Suzhou, China.成人烧伤的流行病学和临床特征:中国苏州一家主要烧伤中心的 6 年回顾性研究。
Front Public Health. 2024 Jun 26;12:1413986. doi: 10.3389/fpubh.2024.1413986. eCollection 2024.
7
Predicting Mortality in Burn Patients: Literature Review of Risk Factors for Burn Mortality and Application in Scoring Systems.预测烧伤患者的死亡率:烧伤死亡率危险因素的文献综述及其在评分系统中的应用
Ann Burns Fire Disasters. 2023 Mar 31;36(1):3-10. eCollection 2023 Mar.
8
Clinical Outcomes Among Elderly People With Burns.老年烧伤患者的临床结局
Ann Burns Fire Disasters. 2023 Sep 30;36(3):191-201. eCollection 2023 Sep.
9
[Research advances on prognosis-related forecasting models for burn patients].[烧伤患者预后相关预测模型的研究进展]
Zhonghua Shao Shang Yu Chuang Mian Xiu Fu Za Zhi. 2023 Sep 20;39(9):891-895. doi: 10.3760/cma.j.cn501225-20221022-00468.
10
Epidemiology and risk prediction of patients with severe burns admitted to a burn intensive care unit in a burn center in beijing: A 5-year retrospective study.北京某烧伤中心烧伤重症监护病房收治的严重烧伤患者的流行病学及风险预测:一项5年回顾性研究
Heliyon. 2022 Dec 24;8(12):e12572. doi: 10.1016/j.heliyon.2022.e12572. eCollection 2022 Dec.