• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

西班牙 SOBRINA 研究——分析初级保健中超用的频率、成本和不良事件:一项回顾性队列研究方案。

SOBRINA Spanish study-analysing the frequency, cost and adverse events associated with overuse in primary care: protocol for a retrospective cohort study.

机构信息

Department of Health Psychology, Universidad Miguel Hernández de Elche, Elche, Spain.

Salud Alicante-Sant Joan Health District, Alicante, Spain.

出版信息

BMJ Open. 2019 Mar 4;9(3):e023399. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2018-023399.

DOI:10.1136/bmjopen-2018-023399
PMID:30837247
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC6429720/
Abstract

INTRODUCTION

Several institutions and quality national agencies have fostered the creation of recommendations on what not to do to reduce overuse in clinical practice. In primary care, their impact has hardly been studied. The frequency of adverse events (AEs) associated with doing what must not be done has not been analysed, either. The aim of this study is to measure the frequency of overuse and AEs associated with doing what must not be done (commission errors) in primary care and their cost.

METHODS AND ANALYSIS

A coordinated, multicentric, national project. A retrospective cohort study using computerised databases of primary care medical records from national agencies and regional health services will be conducted to analyse the frequency of the overuse due to ignore the do-not-do recommendations, and immediately afterwards, depending on their frequency, a representative random sample of medical records will be reviewed with algorithms (triggers) that determine the frequency of AEs associated with these recommendations. Cost will determine by summation of the direct costs due to the consultation, pharmacy, laboratory and imaging activities according to the cases.

ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION

The study protocol has been approved by the Ethics Committee of Primary Care Research of the Valencian Community. We aim to disseminate the findings through international peer-reviewed journals and on the website (http://www.nohacer.es/). Outcomes will be used to incorporate algorithms into the electronic history to assist in making clinical decisions.

TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER

NCT03482232; Pre-results.

摘要

简介

一些机构和国家级质量保证机构已经提出了一些建议,旨在减少临床实践中的过度医疗行为。但这些建议在基层医疗中的影响尚未得到充分研究,而且也没有分析过与做不该做的事情(即执行禁止性医嘱)相关的不良事件(AE)的发生频率和所带来的成本。本研究旨在测量基层医疗中因忽视禁止性医嘱而导致的过度医疗行为的发生频率和相关不良事件及其成本。

方法和分析

这是一项协调的、多中心的、全国性的项目。将采用回顾性队列研究,利用国家机构和区域卫生服务的基层医疗计算机数据库,分析因忽视禁止性医嘱而导致的过度医疗行为的发生频率,然后根据其发生频率,对医嘱进行代表性的随机抽样,并使用确定与这些医嘱相关的 AE 发生频率的算法(触发因素)进行审核。成本将根据案例确定,通过汇总因咨询、药房、实验室和影像学活动而产生的直接成本来确定。

伦理和传播

该研究方案已经得到了瓦伦西亚社区初级保健研究伦理委员会的批准。我们的目标是通过国际同行评议期刊和网站(http://www.nohacer.es/)来传播研究结果。研究结果将用于将算法纳入电子病历,以协助临床决策。

试验注册编号

NCT03482232;预注册结果。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/add2/6429720/fd279742bb42/bmjopen-2018-023399f03.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/add2/6429720/e909cec5fb25/bmjopen-2018-023399f01.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/add2/6429720/4e998ce81456/bmjopen-2018-023399f02.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/add2/6429720/fd279742bb42/bmjopen-2018-023399f03.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/add2/6429720/e909cec5fb25/bmjopen-2018-023399f01.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/add2/6429720/4e998ce81456/bmjopen-2018-023399f02.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/add2/6429720/fd279742bb42/bmjopen-2018-023399f03.jpg

相似文献

1
SOBRINA Spanish study-analysing the frequency, cost and adverse events associated with overuse in primary care: protocol for a retrospective cohort study.西班牙 SOBRINA 研究——分析初级保健中超用的频率、成本和不良事件:一项回顾性队列研究方案。
BMJ Open. 2019 Mar 4;9(3):e023399. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2018-023399.
2
Understanding the epidemiology of avoidable significant harm in primary care: protocol for a retrospective cross-sectional study.了解初级保健中可避免的重大伤害的流行病学:一项回顾性横断面研究方案。
BMJ Open. 2017 Feb 17;7(2):e013786. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2016-013786.
3
Better understanding the downsides of low value healthcare could reduce harm.更好地理解低价值医疗保健的弊端可以减少危害。
BMJ. 2021 Mar 23;372:n117. doi: 10.1136/bmj.n117.
4
Primary care requests for anaemia chemistry tests in Spain: potential iron, transferrin and folate over-requesting.西班牙初级医疗保健机构对贫血化学检测的请求:铁、转铁蛋白和叶酸可能存在过度检测的情况。
J Clin Pathol. 2017 Sep;70(9):760-765. doi: 10.1136/jclinpath-2016-204249. Epub 2017 Feb 17.
5
Epidemiological study on gender bias and low-value practices in primary care: a study protocol.初级保健中性别偏见和低价值实践的流行病学研究:研究方案。
BMJ Open. 2023 May 9;13(5):e070311. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2022-070311.
6
Cost-effectiveness of exercise referral schemes enhanced by self-management strategies to battle sedentary behaviour in older adults: protocol for an economic evaluation alongside the SITLESS three-armed pragmatic randomised controlled trial.通过自我管理策略加强运动转诊计划以对抗老年人久坐行为的成本效益:与SITLESS三臂实用随机对照试验同时进行的经济评估方案
BMJ Open. 2018 Oct 15;8(10):e022266. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2018-022266.
7
Measuring overuse with electronic health records data.利用电子健康记录数据测量过度医疗。
Am J Manag Care. 2018 Jan;24(1):19-25.
8
[Description of contributing factors in adverse events related to patient safety and their preventability].[与患者安全相关不良事件的促成因素及其可预防性描述]
Aten Primaria. 2018 Oct;50(8):486-492. doi: 10.1016/j.aprim.2017.05.013. Epub 2017 Nov 26.
9
Highlighting a Common Quality of Care Delivery Problem: Overuse of Low-value Healthcare Services.突出医疗服务提供中的一个常见质量问题:低价值医疗服务的过度使用。
J Healthc Qual. 2018 Jul/Aug;40(4):201-208. doi: 10.1097/JHQ.0000000000000095.
10
Clinical Decision Support Reduces Overuse of Red Blood Cell Transfusions: Interrupted Time Series Analysis.临床决策支持减少红细胞输血的过度使用:中断时间序列分析。
Am J Med. 2016 Jun;129(6):636.e13-20. doi: 10.1016/j.amjmed.2016.01.024. Epub 2016 Feb 9.

引用本文的文献

1
Gender Disparities in Adverse Events Resulting From Low-Value Practices in Family Practice in Spain: A Retrospective Cohort Study.性别差异在西班牙家庭医学中低价值实践导致的不良事件:一项回顾性队列研究。
Int J Public Health. 2024 Jul 16;69:1607030. doi: 10.3389/ijph.2024.1607030. eCollection 2024.
2
Epidemiological study on gender bias and low-value practices in primary care: a study protocol.初级保健中性别偏见和低价值实践的流行病学研究:研究方案。
BMJ Open. 2023 May 9;13(5):e070311. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2022-070311.

本文引用的文献

1
Low-value clinical practices and harm caused by non-adherence to 'do not do' recommendations in primary care in Spain: a Delphi study.西班牙初级保健中低价值临床实践和不遵守“不做”建议造成的危害:一项德尔菲研究。
Int J Qual Health Care. 2019 Aug 1;31(7):519-526. doi: 10.1093/intqhc/mzy203.
2
[Smarter medicine in ambulatory care : beliefs and practices of family doctors and training of future clinicians].[门诊医疗中的智能医学:家庭医生的信念与实践及未来临床医生的培训]
Rev Med Suisse. 2017 Jan 25;13(547):285-287.
3
Small Decline In Low-Value Back Imaging Associated With The 'Choosing Wisely' Campaign, 2012-14.
“明智选择”运动实施后,2012-2014 年低价值背部影像学检查略有下降。
Health Aff (Millwood). 2017 Apr 1;36(4):671-679. doi: 10.1377/hlthaff.2016.1263.
4
Commitment to quality of the Spanish scientific societies.西班牙科学协会对质量的承诺。
Rev Clin Esp (Barc). 2017 May;217(4):212-221. doi: 10.1016/j.rce.2017.02.008. Epub 2017 Mar 15.
5
The "Choosing Wisely" initiative in infectious diseases.传染病领域的“明智选择”倡议。
Infection. 2017 Jun;45(3):263-268. doi: 10.1007/s15010-017-0997-0. Epub 2017 Mar 13.
6
Is Excessive Resource Utilization an Adverse Event?
JAMA. 2017 Feb 28;317(8):849-850. doi: 10.1001/jama.2017.0698.
7
Evidence for overuse of medical services around the world.世界各地医疗服务过度使用的证据。
Lancet. 2017 Jul 8;390(10090):156-168. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(16)32585-5. Epub 2017 Jan 9.
8
The Italian Society of Internal Medicine choosing wisely campaign.意大利内科医学学会明智选择行动
Intern Emerg Med. 2016 Dec;11(8):1125-1130. doi: 10.1007/s11739-016-1560-1. Epub 2016 Nov 1.
9
A survey of primary care patients' readiness to engage in the de-adoption practices recommended by Choosing Wisely Canada.一项关于初级保健患者参与加拿大明智选择运动所推荐的弃用医疗行为的意愿的调查。
BMC Res Notes. 2016 Jun 10;9:301. doi: 10.1186/s13104-016-2103-6.
10
Inappropriate ordering of lumbar spine magnetic resonance imaging: are providers Choosing Wisely?腰椎磁共振成像的不恰当开单:医疗服务提供者是否在明智选择?
Am J Manag Care. 2016 Feb 1;22(2):e68-76.