Suppr超能文献

24 小时尿肌酐排泄估算方程在住院高血压患者中与实测 24 小时尿肌酐排泄的相关性研究。

Performance of 24-hour urinary creatinine excretion-estimating equations in relation to measured 24-hour urinary creatinine excretion in hospitalized hypertensive patients.

机构信息

Department of Internal Medicine, Hypertension and Vascular Diseases, Medical University of Warsaw, Warsaw, Poland.

出版信息

Sci Rep. 2019 Mar 5;9(1):3593. doi: 10.1038/s41598-019-40416-w.

Abstract

Estimated 24-hour urinary creatinine excretion (24 hrUCr) may be useful for converting spot urine analyte/creatinine ratio into estimated 24-hour urinary excretion of the evaluated analyte, and for verifying completeness of 24-hour urinary collections. We compared various published 24 hrUCr-estimating equations against measured 24 hrUCr in hospitalized hypertensive patients. 24 hrUCr was measured in 293 patients and estimated using eight formulas (CKD-EPI, Cockcroft-Gault, Walser, Goldwasser, Rule, Gerber-Mann, Kawasaki, Tanaka). We used the Pearson correlation coefficient, the Bland-Altman method, and the percentage of estimated 24 hrUCr within 15%, 30% (P30), and 50% of measured 24hUCr to compare estimated and measured 24 hrUCr. Differences between the mean bias by eight formulas were evaluated using the Friedman rank sum test. Overall, the best formulas were CKD-EPI (mean bias 0.002 g/d, P30 86%) and Rule (mean bias 0.022 g/d, P30 89%), although both tended to underestimate 24 hrUCr with higher excretion values. The Gerber-Mann formula and the Asian formulas (Tanaka, Kawasaki) were less precise in our study population but superior in an analysis restricted to subjects with highest measured 24 hrUCr per body weight. We found significant differences between 24 hrUCr-estimating equations in hypertensive patients. In addition, formula performance was critically affected by inclusion criteria based on measured 24 hrUCr per body weight.

摘要

估计 24 小时尿肌酐排泄量(24 小时 UCr)可用于将尿液样本中分析物/肌酐比值转换为估计的 24 小时分析物排泄量,并验证 24 小时尿液收集的完整性。我们比较了在住院高血压患者中使用各种已发表的 24 小时 UCr 估算公式与实测的 24 小时 UCr。我们测量了 293 例患者的 24 小时 UCr,并使用 8 种公式(CKD-EPI、Cockcroft-Gault、Walser、Goldwasser、Rule、Gerber-Mann、Kawasaki、Tanaka)来估算。我们使用 Pearson 相关系数、Bland-Altman 方法和估计的 24 小时 UCr 与实测 24 小时 UCr 的比值为 15%、30%(P30)和 50%来比较估算和实测的 24 小时 UCr。使用 Friedman 等级和检验评估 8 种公式的平均偏差差异。总体而言,最好的公式是 CKD-EPI(平均偏差 0.002 g/d,P30 为 86%)和 Rule(平均偏差 0.022 g/d,P30 为 89%),尽管这两种公式在高排泄值时都倾向于低估 24 小时 UCr。在我们的研究人群中,Gerber-Mann 公式和亚洲公式(Tanaka、Kawasaki)的精度较低,但在对按体重测量的最高 24 小时 UCr 进行分析时表现更好。我们发现高血压患者的 24 小时 UCr 估算公式之间存在显著差异。此外,公式的性能受到基于体重的实测 24 小时 UCr 的纳入标准的严重影响。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/45cd/6401114/5583ee5f5f42/41598_2019_40416_Fig1_HTML.jpg

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验