U.O.S. Terapia Conservativa della Malattia Renale Cronica, U.O.C. Nefrologia, Dipartimento di Scienze Mediche e Chirurgiche, Fondazione Policlinico Universitario A. Gemelli IRCCS, Rome, Italy.
Dipartimento Universitario di Medicina e Chirurgia Traslazionale, Università Cattolica del Sacro Cuore, Rome, Italy.
Nephrol Dial Transplant. 2022 Oct 19;37(11):2171-2179. doi: 10.1093/ndt/gfab306.
One limitation of the use of 24-hour collection is impracticality. We analysed the performance of spot urine measurements to estimate 24-hour excretion in patients with kidney stones.
A total of 74 adult patients from two centres performed a 24-hour urine collection. A sample of the last micturition was sent for spot urine analysis. Twenty patients were asked to collect two additional spot urine samples, one before dinner and the other after dinner. Urinary concentrations of creatinine, calcium, oxalate, uric acid, citrate and magnesium were measured in the 24-hour and each of the spot urine samples. Four approaches were used to estimate 24-hour urinary excretion, multiplying the ratio of the spot urinary analyte to creatinine concentration by (i) measured 24-hour urinary creatinine excretion (Prediction 1), (ii) estimated 24-hour urinary creatinine excretion (Prediction 2), (iii) assumed 1-g 24-hour urinary creatinine excretion (Prediction 3) or (iv) assumed 1.5-g 24-hour urinary creatinine excretion (Prediction 4). For each parameter we computed Lin's concordance correlation coefficients (CCCs), Bland-Altman plots and 95% limits of agreement.
The performance of estimates obtained with Prediction 1 and Prediction 2 was similar, except for citrate and uric acid, for which Prediction 2 performed worse. Both approaches performed moderately well: citrate CCC {0.82 [95% confidence interval (CI) 0.75-0.90]}, oxalate [0.66 (95% CI 0.55-0.78)], magnesium [0.66 (95% CI 0.54-0.77)], calcium [0.63 (95% CI 0.50-0.75)] and uric acid [0.52 (95% CI 0.36-0.68)]. The performance of Predictions 3 and 4 was worse.
Although spot urine samples may hold promise for clinical and population-based research, at present they have limited utility in clinical practice. Measuring or estimating 24-hour creatinine, rather than assuming a given creatinine excretion, will be necessary in future studies of spot urine samples.
24 小时收集的一个局限性是不切实际。我们分析了单次尿液测量来估计肾结石患者的 24 小时排泄量。
来自两个中心的总共 74 名成年患者进行了 24 小时尿液收集。最后一次排尿的样本被送去进行单次尿液分析。有 20 名患者被要求收集另外两个单次尿液样本,一个在晚餐前,另一个在晚餐后。在 24 小时和每个单次尿液样本中测量了肌酐、钙、草酸盐、尿酸、柠檬酸和镁的尿液浓度。使用四种方法估计 24 小时尿排泄量,即用(i)测量的 24 小时尿肌酐排泄量(预测 1)、(ii)估计的 24 小时尿肌酐排泄量(预测 2)、(iii)假设的 1g 24 小时尿肌酐排泄量(预测 3)或(iv)假设的 1.5g 24 小时尿肌酐排泄量(预测 4)乘以单次尿分析物与肌酐浓度的比值。对于每个参数,我们计算了林氏一致性相关系数(CCCs)、Bland-Altman 图和 95%一致性界限。
预测 1 和预测 2 获得的估计值的性能相似,除了柠檬酸和尿酸,对于这两个参数,预测 2 的表现较差。两种方法的性能都相当不错:柠檬酸 CCC{0.82[95%置信区间(CI)0.75-0.90]},草酸盐[0.66(95%CI 0.55-0.78)],镁[0.66(95%CI 0.54-0.77)],钙[0.63(95%CI 0.50-0.75)]和尿酸[0.52(95%CI 0.36-0.68)]。预测 3 和预测 4 的性能更差。
尽管单次尿液样本可能在临床和基于人群的研究中具有前景,但目前它们在临床实践中的应用有限。在未来的单次尿液样本研究中,需要测量或估计 24 小时肌酐,而不是假设给定的肌酐排泄量。