Hackett G H, Hughes R, Payne J P
Br J Anaesth. 1986 May;58(5):494-7. doi: 10.1093/bja/58.5.494.
Atracurium 0.3 mg kg-1 was given to two groups of patients to compare the recovery of spontaneous breathing with that of peripheral neuromuscular function. Anaesthesia was maintained in one group (n = 6) with an infusion of etomidate (mean flow rate 24 micrograms kg-1 min-1) and in the other group (n = 5) with 0.5% halothane. From the time of discontinuing ventilation, about 5 min after the reappearance of the tetanic response, spontaneous breathing returned in an average time of 135 s (range 18-300) in the patients given etomidate and in 68 s (range 0-123) in the patients who received halothane (ns). The duration of action of atracurium was not significantly prolonged by halothane, probably because of the low concentration used. Adequate recovery of respiratory muscle function occurred within 30 min of administration of atracurium at a time when there was less than 25% recovery of the tetanic response of the adductor pollicis muscle. It was concluded that recovery of the muscles of respiration from neuromuscular blockade by atracurium occurred more rapidly than recovery of the muscles of the hand, but an adequate tidal volume in the absence of other clinical signs should not be regarded as a reliable indicator of complete return of neuromuscular function.
给两组患者静脉注射阿曲库铵0.3 mg/kg,以比较自主呼吸恢复情况与外周神经肌肉功能恢复情况。一组(n = 6)通过输注依托咪酯(平均流速24 μg/kg/min)维持麻醉,另一组(n = 5)通过0.5% 氟烷维持麻醉。从停止通气时起,即强直刺激反应重现后约5分钟,接受依托咪酯的患者自主呼吸恢复的平均时间为135秒(范围18 - 300秒),接受氟烷的患者为68秒(范围0 - 123秒)(无显著差异)。氟烷并未显著延长阿曲库铵的作用时间,可能是因为使用的浓度较低。在给予阿曲库铵后30分钟内,呼吸肌功能得到充分恢复,此时拇内收肌的强直刺激反应恢复不到25%。研究得出结论,阿曲库铵所致神经肌肉阻滞的呼吸肌恢复比手部肌肉恢复更快,但在没有其他临床体征的情况下,足够的潮气量不应被视为神经肌肉功能完全恢复的可靠指标。