Department of Psychiatry, University of Iowa, Iowa City, IA, USA.
Department of Psychiatry, University of Iowa, Rm 2-219 MEB, 500 Newton Road, Iowa City, IA, 52242, USA.
J Autism Dev Disord. 2020 Jun;50(6):2053-2063. doi: 10.1007/s10803-019-03961-x.
The Interactive Autism Network (IAN) administered a survey to caregivers of children with Autism Spectrum Disorder (ASD) on their interventions for elopement behavior (EB). Data from 526 respondents were analyzed. Most families reported multiple interventions for EB and rated interventions overall as effective but burdensome. Several interventions such as fencing and window locks had favorable effectiveness/burden profiles. Tracking devices were used infrequently and rated as having low effectiveness. Behavioral specialists were commonly used, rated as effective, and most often provided by insurance. Medications were rated as having low effectiveness for EB, whether taken off-label for EB or for other reasons. Further study is needed to identify EB interventions that are effective, affordable, and easy to implement are needed.
互动自闭症网络(IAN)对自闭症谱系障碍(ASD)儿童的照顾者进行了一项关于他们的出走行为(EB)干预措施的调查。对 526 名受访者的数据进行了分析。大多数家庭报告了多种针对 EB 的干预措施,并总体上认为这些干预措施有效但负担沉重。一些干预措施,如围栏和窗户锁,具有有利的有效性/负担比。跟踪设备使用频率较低,且效果评价较低。行为专家经常被使用,评价有效,且最常由保险支付。药物治疗被评价为对 EB 的疗效低,无论是为 EB 还是其他原因而开的。需要进一步研究来确定有效、负担得起且易于实施的 EB 干预措施。