Gavin Michael C, Kavanagh Patrick H, Haynie Hannah J, Bowern Claire, Ember Carol R, Gray Russell D, Jordan Fiona M, Kirby Kathryn R, Kushnick Geoff, Low Bobbi S, Vilela Bruno, Botero Carlos A
Human Dimensions of Natural Resources, Colorado State University, Fort Collins, CO, USA.
Department of Linguistic and Cultural Evolution, Max Planck Institute for the Science of Human History, Jena, Germany.
R Soc Open Sci. 2018 Sep 26;5(9):171897. doi: 10.1098/rsos.171897. eCollection 2018 Sep.
How humans obtain food has dramatically reshaped ecosystems and altered both the trajectory of human history and the characteristics of human societies. Our species' subsistence varies widely, from predominantly foraging strategies, to plant-based agriculture and animal husbandry. The extent to which environmental, social and historical factors have driven such variation is currently unclear. Prior attempts to resolve long-standing debates on this topic have been hampered by an over-reliance on narrative arguments, small and geographically narrow samples, and by contradictory findings. Here we overcome these methodological limitations by applying multi-model inference tools developed in biogeography to a global dataset (818 societies). Although some have argued that unique conditions and events determine each society's particular subsistence strategy, we find strong support for a general global pattern in which a limited set of environmental, social and historical factors predicts an essential characteristic of all human groups: how we obtain our food.
人类获取食物的方式极大地重塑了生态系统,改变了人类历史的轨迹以及人类社会的特征。我们这个物种的生存方式差异很大,从以觅食为主的策略到以植物为基础的农业和畜牧业。目前尚不清楚环境、社会和历史因素在多大程度上推动了这种差异。此前试图解决关于这一主题的长期争论的努力,因过度依赖叙述性论据、样本规模小且地域范围狭窄以及相互矛盾的研究结果而受阻。在这里,我们通过将生物地理学中开发的多模型推理工具应用于一个全球数据集(818个社会群体),克服了这些方法上的局限性。尽管有些人认为独特的条件和事件决定了每个社会群体特定的生存策略,但我们发现有强有力的证据支持一种普遍的全球模式,即一组有限的环境、社会和历史因素能够预测所有人类群体的一个基本特征:我们如何获取食物。