Suppr超能文献

重症监护患者中严重坏死性软组织感染的强化多学科管理:一种提高治疗效果的协作方法。

Intensive multidisciplinary management in critical care patients affected by severe necrotizing soft tissue infections: a cooperative method to improve the efficacy of treatment.

机构信息

Department of Oncology and Hemato-oncology, Postgraduate School of Clinical Pharmacology and Toxicology, University of Milan, Milan, Italy.

Intensive Care Unit 1, ASST Grande Ospedale Metropolitano Niguarda, Piazza dell'Ospedale Maggiore 3, Milan, Italy.

出版信息

Eur J Clin Microbiol Infect Dis. 2019 Jun;38(6):1153-1162. doi: 10.1007/s10096-019-03521-2. Epub 2019 Mar 6.

Abstract

To illustrate the effectiveness of our intensive multidisciplinary management (IMM) in the treatment of severely ill patients with necrotizing soft tissue infections (NSTIs). A retrospective observational study was conducted in a general ICU. Thirty-two consecutive patients undergoing IMM were carefully compared with 30 consecutive patients receiving a standard management (SM). IMM combined intensive care management, early surgical debridement followed by daily inspection of surgical wounds, close microbiological surveillance, and targeted high-dose antibiotics. IMM was associated with the better decrease of daily SOFA score (p = 0.04). Also, IMM caused + 12% increase in the overall number of surgical procedures (p = 0.022) and a higher number of tissue biopsies/per day (median 0.63 versus 0.32; p = 0.025), leading to a more targeted antimicrobial changes (89.6% vs 51.6%; p < 0.00001). High-dose daptomycin (75% vs 36.7%; p = 0.002) and extended/continuous infusion of beta-lactams (75% vs 43.3%; p = 0.011) were more frequently utilized. A specific efficiency score correlated with the decrease of SOFA score (efficacy) in IMM patients only (p = 0.027). Finally, IMM was associated with a significant lower ICU mortality rate (15.6% vs 40%; p = 0.032). IMM was more effective than SM as it allowed the earlier control of infection and the faster reduction of multiple organ-dysfunction.

摘要

为了说明我们强化多学科管理(IMM)在治疗严重坏死性软组织感染(NSTIs)患者中的有效性,我们进行了一项回顾性观察性研究。在普通 ICU 中,对 32 例接受 IMM 的连续患者进行了仔细比较,并与 30 例接受标准治疗(SM)的连续患者进行了比较。IMM 结合了强化监护管理、早期外科清创术,随后每天检查外科伤口、密切的微生物监测以及靶向高剂量抗生素治疗。IMM 与每日 SOFA 评分的降低(p = 0.04)更相关。此外,IMM 导致总手术次数增加了+12%(p = 0.022),每天进行的组织活检/检查次数也更多(中位数分别为 0.63 次和 0.32 次;p = 0.025),从而实现了更具靶向性的抗菌药物调整(89.6%比 51.6%;p<0.00001)。更频繁地使用高剂量达托霉素(75%比 36.7%;p = 0.002)和延长/持续输注β-内酰胺类药物(75%比 43.3%;p = 0.011)。只有 IMM 患者的特定效率评分与 SOFA 评分的降低(疗效)相关(p = 0.027)。最后,IMM 与 ICU 死亡率显著降低相关(15.6%比 40%;p = 0.032)。IMM 比 SM 更有效,因为它可以更早地控制感染,并更快地降低多器官功能障碍。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验