• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利：CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法，用中文像聊天一样搜索，搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐，让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版，准确专业，支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式，支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述，25分钟生成高质量综述，智能提取关键信息，辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

Theory meets practice: a commentary on VanderWeele's 'principles of confounder selection'.

作者信息

Schneeweiss Sebastian

机构信息

Division of Pharmacoepidemiology and Pharmacoeconomics, Department of Medicine, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA.

出版信息

Eur J Epidemiol. 2019 Mar;34(3):221-222. doi: 10.1007/s10654-019-00495-5. Epub 2019 Mar 6.

DOI:10.1007/s10654-019-00495-5
PMID:30840182
Abstract
摘要

相似文献

1
Theory meets practice: a commentary on VanderWeele's 'principles of confounder selection'.理论与实践：对范德韦尔“混杂因素选择原则”的评论
Eur J Epidemiol. 2019 Mar;34(3):221-222. doi: 10.1007/s10654-019-00495-5. Epub 2019 Mar 6.
2
Consistency of effects is important in replication: Rejoinder to Mathur and VanderWeele (2019).复制研究中结果的一致性很重要：对 Mathur 和 VanderWeele（2019）的回应。
Psychol Methods. 2019 Oct;24(5):576-577. doi: 10.1037/met0000237.
3
Intersectional decomposition analysis with differential exposure, effects, and construct.交叉分解分析与差异暴露、效应和构建。
Soc Sci Med. 2019 Apr;226:254-259. doi: 10.1016/j.socscimed.2019.01.033. Epub 2019 Jan 31.
4
Principles of confounder selection.混杂因素选择原则。
Eur J Epidemiol. 2019 Mar;34(3):211-219. doi: 10.1007/s10654-019-00494-6. Epub 2019 Mar 6.
5
The Hill-Robertson effect is a consequence of interplay between linkage, selection and drift: a commentary on 'The effect of linkage on limits to artificial selection' by W. G. Hill and A. Robertson.
Genet Res. 2007 Dec;89(5-6):309-10. doi: 10.1017/S0016672308009506.
6
Estimating the recombination parameter: a commentary on 'Estimating the recombination parameter of a finite population model without selection' by Richard R. Hudson.
Genet Res. 2007 Dec;89(5-6):425-6. doi: 10.1017/S0016672308009622.
7
Counterpoint: Mediation Formulas With Binary Mediators and Outcomes and the "Rare Outcome Assumption".反驳：具有二元中介和结局的中介公式与“罕见结局假设”。
Am J Epidemiol. 2019 Jul 1;188(7):1204-1205. doi: 10.1093/aje/kwy281.
8
No shortage of dilemmas: comment on "They call it 'patient selection' in Khayelitsha".
Camb Q Healthc Ethics. 2006 Summer;15(3):313-21; discussion 331-2.
9
An alternative interpretation of cellular 'selfish spermatogonial selection'-clusters in the human testis indicates the need for 3-D-analyses.对人类睾丸中细胞“自私的精原细胞选择”簇的另一种解释表明需要进行三维分析。
Andrology. 2016 Mar;4(2):213-7. doi: 10.1111/andr.12142. Epub 2016 Feb 19.
10
The genetics and evolution of female choice.雌性选择的遗传学和进化。
Trends Ecol Evol. 1986 Jul;1(1):1-7. doi: 10.1016/0169-5347(86)90056-X.

引用本文的文献

1
Vancomycin-Induced Acute Kidney Injury in Intensive Care Patients: A Target Trial Emulation Study Using Multicenter Routinely Collected Data.重症监护患者中万古霉素诱导的急性肾损伤：一项使用多中心常规收集数据的目标试验模拟研究
Pharmacoepidemiol Drug Saf. 2025 Sep;34(9):e70205. doi: 10.1002/pds.70205.
2
Transparency of high-dimensional propensity score analyses: Guidance for diagnostics and reporting.高维倾向评分分析的透明度：诊断和报告指南。
Pharmacoepidemiol Drug Saf. 2022 Apr;31(4):411-423. doi: 10.1002/pds.5412. Epub 2022 Feb 12.
3
On the relationship of machine learning with causal inference.

本文引用的文献

1
Automated data-adaptive analytics for electronic healthcare data to study causal treatment effects.用于研究因果治疗效果的电子医疗数据的自动化数据自适应分析。
Clin Epidemiol. 2018 Jul 6;10:771-788. doi: 10.2147/CLEP.S166545. eCollection 2018.
2
Collaborative-controlled LASSO for constructing propensity score-based estimators in high-dimensional data.基于协作控制 LASSO 的高维数据倾向评分匹配估计量的构建
Stat Methods Med Res. 2019 Apr;28(4):1044-1063. doi: 10.1177/0962280217744588. Epub 2017 Dec 11.
3
Using Super Learner Prediction Modeling to Improve High-dimensional Propensity Score Estimation.
论机器学习与因果推断的关系。
Eur J Epidemiol. 2020 Feb;35(2):183-185. doi: 10.1007/s10654-019-00564-9. Epub 2019 Sep 27.
运用超级学习者预测模型提高高维倾向评分估计的效果。
Epidemiology. 2018 Jan;29(1):96-106. doi: 10.1097/EDE.0000000000000762.
4
Sentinel Modular Program for Propensity Score-Matched Cohort Analyses: Application to Glyburide, Glipizide, and Serious Hypoglycemia.Sentinel 模块化倾向评分匹配队列分析计划：在格列本脲、格列吡嗪和严重低血糖中的应用。
Epidemiology. 2017 Nov;28(6):838-846. doi: 10.1097/EDE.0000000000000709.
5
Variable Selection for Confounding Adjustment in High-dimensional Covariate Spaces When Analyzing Healthcare Databases.分析医疗保健数据库时高维协变量空间中用于混杂调整的变量选择
Epidemiology. 2017 Mar;28(2):237-248. doi: 10.1097/EDE.0000000000000581.
6
Addressing limitations in observational studies of the association between glucose-lowering medications and all-cause mortality: a review.解决降糖药物与全因死亡率之间关联的观察性研究中的局限性：一项综述
Drug Saf. 2015 Mar;38(3):295-310. doi: 10.1007/s40264-015-0280-1.
7
Implications of M bias in epidemiologic studies: a simulation study.流行病学研究中 M 偏倚的意义：一项模拟研究。
Am J Epidemiol. 2012 Nov 15;176(10):938-48. doi: 10.1093/aje/kws165. Epub 2012 Oct 25.
8
Effects of adjusting for instrumental variables on bias and precision of effect estimates.调整工具变量对效应估计偏差和精度的影响。
Am J Epidemiol. 2011 Dec 1;174(11):1213-22. doi: 10.1093/aje/kwr364. Epub 2011 Oct 24.
9
A basic study design for expedited safety signal evaluation based on electronic healthcare data.基于电子医疗数据的加速安全性信号评估的基本研究设计。
Pharmacoepidemiol Drug Saf. 2010 Aug;19(8):858-68. doi: 10.1002/pds.1926.
10
A review of uses of health care utilization databases for epidemiologic research on therapeutics.医疗保健利用数据库在治疗学流行病学研究中的应用综述。
J Clin Epidemiol. 2005 Apr;58(4):323-37. doi: 10.1016/j.jclinepi.2004.10.012.