Schnall Amy Helene, Roth Joseph Jay, Ekpo Lisa LaPlace, Guendel Irene, Davis Michelle, Ellis Esther M
1National Center for Environmental Health (NCEH),Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC),Atlanta,GA(Ms Schnall).
2Office of Public Health Preparedness and Response (OPHPR),Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC;Atlanta,GA)assigned to U.S. Virgin Islands Department of Health (St Thomas, USVI) (Mr Roth).
Disaster Med Public Health Prep. 2019 Feb;13(1):38-43. doi: 10.1017/dmp.2018.146.
Two Category 5 storms, Hurricane Irma and Hurricane Maria, hit the U.S. Virgin Islands (USVI) within 13 days of each other in September 2017. These storms caused catastrophic damage across the territory, including widespread loss of power, destruction of homes, and devastation of critical infrastructure. During large scale disasters such as Hurricanes Irma and Maria, public health surveillance is an important tool to track emerging illnesses and injuries, identify at-risk populations, and assess the effectiveness of response efforts. The USVI Department of Health (DoH) partnered with shelter staff volunteers to monitor the health of the sheltered population and help guide response efforts.
Shelter volunteers collect data on the American Red Cross Aggregate Morbidity Report form that tallies the number of client visits at a shelter's health services every 24 hours. Morbidity data were collected at all 5 shelters on St. Thomas and St. Croix between September and October 2017. This article describes the health surveillance data collected in response to Hurricanes Irma and Maria.
Following Hurricanes Irma and Maria, 1130 health-related client visits were reported, accounting for 1655 reasons for the visits (each client may have more than 1 reason for a single visit). Only 1 shelter reported data daily. Over half of visits (51.2%) were for health care management; 17.7% for acute illnesses, which include respiratory conditions, gastrointestinal symptoms, and pain; 14.6% for exacerbation of chronic disease; 9.8% for mental health; and 6.7% for injury. Shelter volunteers treated many clients within the shelters; however, reporting of the disposition (eg, referred to physician, pharmacist) was often missed (78.1%).
Shelter surveillance is an efficient means of quickly identifying and characterizing health issues and concerns in sheltered populations following disasters, allowing for the development of evidence-based strategies to address identified needs. When incorporated into broader surveillance strategies using multiple data sources, shelter data can enable disaster epidemiologists to paint a more comprehensive picture of community health, thereby planning and responding to health issues both within and outside of shelters. The findings from this report illustrated that managing chronic conditions presented a more notable resource demand than acute injuries and illnesses. Although there remains room for improvement because reporting was inconsistent throughout the response, the capacity of shelter staff to address the health needs of shelter residents and the ability to monitor the health needs in the sheltered population were critical resources for the USVI DoH overwhelmed by the disaster. (Disaster Med Public Health Preparedness. 2019;13:38-43).
2017年9月,两场5级飓风——厄玛飓风和玛丽亚飓风,相继在13天内袭击了美属维尔京群岛(USVI)。这些风暴给该地区造成了灾难性破坏,包括大面积停电、房屋被毁以及关键基础设施受损。在诸如厄玛飓风和玛丽亚飓风这样的大规模灾难期间,公共卫生监测是追踪新出现的疾病和伤害、识别高危人群以及评估应对措施有效性的重要工具。美属维尔京群岛卫生部(DoH)与避难所工作人员志愿者合作,监测避难人群的健康状况并协助指导应对工作。
避难所志愿者在红十字会综合发病率报告表上收集数据,该表统计每个避难所健康服务每24小时的就诊人数。2017年9月至10月期间,在圣托马斯岛和圣克罗伊岛的所有5个避难所收集了发病率数据。本文描述了针对厄玛飓风和玛丽亚飓风收集的健康监测数据。
在厄玛飓风和玛丽亚飓风过后,共报告了1130次与健康相关的就诊,涉及1655个就诊原因(每位就诊者单次就诊可能有多个原因)。只有1个避难所每日报告数据。超过半数的就诊(51.2%)是为了进行医疗管理;17.7%是急性疾病,包括呼吸道疾病、胃肠道症状和疼痛;14.6%是慢性病加重;9.8%是心理健康问题;6.7%是受伤。避难所志愿者在避难所内为许多就诊者进行了治疗;然而,处置情况(如转诊给医生、药剂师)的报告经常缺失(78.1%)。
避难所监测是迅速识别和描述灾难后避难人群健康问题及担忧的有效手段,有助于制定基于证据的策略来满足已确定的需求。当将避难所数据纳入使用多个数据源的更广泛监测策略时,可使灾难流行病学家更全面地了解社区健康状况,从而针对避难所内外的健康问题进行规划和应对。本报告的研究结果表明,管理慢性病比处理急性伤害和疾病对资源的需求更为显著。尽管由于整个应对过程中报告情况不一致,仍有改进空间,但避难所工作人员满足避难居民健康需求的能力以及监测避难人群健康需求的能力,对于被灾难压垮的美属维尔京群岛卫生部来说是至关重要的资源。(《灾难医学与公共卫生防范》。2019年;13:38 - 43)