From the Faculty of Education and Health (T.T., F.W.), University of Greenwich, London; York Health Economics Consortium (F.W.), University of York; Acaster Lloyd Consulting Ltd. (K.G.), London, UK; Neurosciences Department (N.V.), Aging Branch, National Research Council, Padova; Neuroscience Centre (M.S.), University of Padova, Italy; Department of Adult Nursing & Paramedic Science (P.N.), University of Greenwich, London; Physiotherapy Department (B.S.), South London and Maudsley NHS Foundation Trust; and Department of Psychological Medicine (B.S.), Institute of Psychiatry, Psychology and Neuroscience, King's College London, De Crespigny Park, London, UK.
Neurology. 2019 Apr 2;92(14):e1652-e1662. doi: 10.1212/WNL.0000000000007238. Epub 2019 Mar 6.
We conducted a meta-analysis of controlled trials that used experimental models of acute pain and hyperalgesia to examine the analgesic effects of NMDA receptor (NMDAR) antagonists.
Six major databases were systematically searched (to March 2018) for studies using human evoked pain models to compare NMDAR antagonists with no-intervention controls. Pain outcome data were analyzed with random-effects meta-analysis.
Searches identified 70 eligible trials (n = 1,069). Meta-analysis found that low-dose ketamine (<1 mg/kg) produced a decrease in hyperalgesic area (standardized mean difference 0.54, 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.34, 0.74, < 0.001) and a 1.2-point decrease (95% CI 0.88, 1.44, < 0.001) in pain ratings from 4.6 to 3.4 on a 0-10 scale (a 26% reduction). Similar analgesia was observed for acute and hyperalgesic models and was constant across the dosing range (0.03-1.00 mg/kg). Moderate to high variability in effect size was observed and mild side effects (e.g., sedation, sensory disturbance) were common. No effects of dextromethorphan were found.
Findings provide robust evidence for analgesic and antihyperalgesic effects of ketamine, supporting its utility for acute and chronic pain management. However, pain relief was modest, suggesting ketamine may potentially be most useful when opioids are contraindicated, rapid analgesia is required, or for pain resistant to conventional medication.
我们对使用急性疼痛和痛觉过敏实验模型的对照试验进行了荟萃分析,以检查 NMDA 受体(NMDAR)拮抗剂的镇痛作用。
系统地检索了六个主要数据库(截至 2018 年 3 月),以查找使用人体诱发疼痛模型比较 NMDAR 拮抗剂与无干预对照的研究。使用随机效应荟萃分析分析疼痛结局数据。
检索确定了 70 项合格试验(n=1069)。荟萃分析发现,低剂量氯胺酮(<1mg/kg)可减少痛觉过敏面积(标准化均数差 0.54,95%置信区间[CI]0.34,0.74,<0.001)和疼痛评分从 4.6 分降至 3.4 分(95%CI0.88,1.44,<0.001)(降低 26%)。在急性和痛觉过敏模型中观察到类似的镇痛作用,并且在整个剂量范围内保持不变(0.03-1.00mg/kg)。观察到效应大小的中度至高度变异性,并且常见轻度副作用(例如镇静,感觉障碍)。未发现右美沙芬的作用。
研究结果为氯胺酮的镇痛和抗痛觉过敏作用提供了强有力的证据,支持其用于急性和慢性疼痛管理。然而,缓解疼痛的效果适中,表明氯胺酮在阿片类药物禁忌,需要快速镇痛或对常规药物有抵抗的疼痛时可能最有用。