Suppr超能文献

2 型糖尿病对冠心病患者压力感受性反射敏感性的额外影响,在机械血管特性恶化的情况下可能无法检测到。

The additional impact of type 2 diabetes on baroreflex sensitivity of coronary artery disease patients might be undetectable in presence of deterioration of mechanical vascular properties.

机构信息

Department of Physical Therapy, Federal University of São Carlos, São Carlos, São Paulo, Brazil.

Department of Biomedical Sciences for Health, University of Milan, Milan, Italy.

出版信息

Med Biol Eng Comput. 2019 Jul;57(7):1405-1415. doi: 10.1007/s11517-019-01966-3. Epub 2019 Mar 7.

Abstract

Both deterioration of the mechanical vascular properties of barosensitive vessels and autonomic derangement lead to modification of baroreflex sensitivity (BRS) in coronary artery disease (CAD) individuals. Type 2 diabetes (T2D) reduces BRS as well even in absence of cardiac autonomic neuropathy. The aim of the study is to clarify whether, assigned the degree of mechanical vascular impairment and without cardiac autonomic neuropathy, the additional autonomic dysfunction imposed in CAD patients by T2D (CAD-T2D) decreases BRS further. We considered CAD (n = 18) and CAD-T2D (n = 19) males featuring similar increases of average carotid intima media thickness (ACIMT) and we compared them to age- and gender-matched healthy (H, n = 19) subjects. BRS was computed from spontaneous beat-to-beat variability of heart period (HP) and systolic arterial pressure (SAP) at supine resting (REST) and during active standing (STAND). BRS was estimated via methods including time domain, spectral, cross-spectral, and model-based techniques. We found that (i) at REST BRS was lower in CAD and CAD-T2D groups than in H subjects but no difference was detected between CAD and CAD-T2D individuals; (ii) STAND induced an additional decrease of BRS visible in all the groups but again BRS estimates of CAD and CAD-T2D patients were alike; (iii) even though with different statistical power, BRS markers reached similar conclusions with the notable exception of the BRS computed via model-based approach that did not detect the BRS decrease during STAND. In presence of a mechanical vascular impairment, indexes estimating BRS from spontaneous HP and SAP fluctuations might be useless to detect the additional derangement of the autonomic control in CAD-T2D without cardiac autonomic neuropathy compared to CAD, thus limiting the applications of cardiovascular variability analysis to typify CAD-T2D individuals. Graphical abstract Graphical representation of the baroreflex sensitivity (BRS) estimated from spontaneous fluctuations of heart period and systolic arterial pressure via transfer function (TF) in low frequency (LF) band (from 0.04 to 0.15 Hz). BRS was reported as a function of the group (i.e., healthy (H), coronary artery disease (CAD) and CAD with type 2 diabetes (CAD-T2D) groups) at REST (black bars) and during STAND (white bars). Values are shown as mean plus standard deviation. The symbol "*" indicates a significant difference between conditions within the same group (i.e., H, CAD, or CAD-T2D) and the symbol "§" indicates a significant difference between groups within the same experimental condition (i.e., REST or STAND). BRS cannot distinguish CAD and CAD-T2D groups both at REST and during STAND, while it is useful to distinguish experimental conditions and separate pathological groups from H subjects.

摘要

压力感受性血管的机械血管特性恶化和自主神经功能障碍都会导致冠状动脉疾病(CAD)患者的压力反射敏感性(BRS)发生变化。即使没有心脏自主神经病变,2 型糖尿病(T2D)也会降低 BRS。本研究旨在阐明在没有心脏自主神经病变的情况下,CAD 患者中由 T2D 引起的额外自主神经功能障碍(CAD-T2D)是否会进一步降低 BRS。我们考虑了 CAD(n=18)和 CAD-T2D(n=19)男性,他们的平均颈动脉内膜中层厚度(ACIMT)均有相似的增加,并且将他们与年龄和性别匹配的健康(H,n=19)受试者进行了比较。BRS 是通过心率(HP)和收缩压(SAP)在仰卧休息(REST)和主动站立(STAND)时的自发性搏动到搏动的变异性计算得出的。BRS 通过时域、频谱、交叉频谱和基于模型的技术进行估计。我们发现:(i)在 REST 时,CAD 和 CAD-T2D 组的 BRS 低于 H 组,但 CAD 和 CAD-T2D 个体之间没有差异;(ii)STAND 诱导的 BRS 额外降低在所有组中均可见,但 CAD 和 CAD-T2D 患者的 BRS 估计值相似;(iii)尽管统计效力不同,但 BRS 标志物得出了类似的结论,值得注意的是,基于模型的方法计算的 BRS 没有检测到 STAND 期间的 BRS 降低。在存在机械血管损伤的情况下,从自发的 HP 和 SAP 波动中估计 BRS 的指标可能无法用于检测 CAD-T2D 患者中与 CAD 相比,心脏自主神经病变之外的自主控制的额外障碍,从而限制了心血管变异性分析的应用来对 CAD-T2D 个体进行分类。

图形摘要

通过传递函数(TF)在低频(LF)带(0.04 至 0.15 Hz)中从自发的心率和收缩压波动中估计的压力反射敏感性(BRS)的图形表示。BRS 作为组(即健康(H)、冠状动脉疾病(CAD)和 CAD 伴 2 型糖尿病(CAD-T2D)组)在 REST(黑色条)和 STAND(白色条)时的函数报告。值显示为平均值加标准差。符号“*”表示同一组内条件之间的差异(即 H、CAD 或 CAD-T2D),符号“§”表示同一实验条件下组之间的差异(即 REST 或 STAND)。BRS 在 REST 和 STAND 时均无法区分 CAD 和 CAD-T2D 组,而在区分实验条件和将病理组与 H 组区分开来时则很有用。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验