• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

阴道膨出修复术后压力性尿失禁:有无压力测试的预测模型的开发和内部验证。

Stress urinary incontinence after vaginal prolapse repair: development and internal validation of a prediction model with and without the stress test.

机构信息

Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, Martini Hospital, Groningen, The Netherlands.

Department of Medical Statistics and Bioinformatics, Leiden University Medical Centre, Leiden, The Netherlands.

出版信息

Neurourol Urodyn. 2019 Apr;38(4):1086-1092. doi: 10.1002/nau.23958. Epub 2019 Mar 7.

DOI:10.1002/nau.23958
PMID:30843271
Abstract

OBJECTIVE

To develop a prediction model for stress urinary incontinence (SUI) after vaginal prolapse repair (postoperative stress urinary incontinence [POSUI]) and assess the value of a preoperative stress test.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

Secondary analysis of two trials in which women were randomised for prolapse repair with or without a midurethral sling (MUS). The trials included women with (CUPIDO-1, n = 134) and without (CUPIDO-2, n = 225) coexisting SUI. POSUI was defined as bothersome SUI one year after surgery and/or treatment of SUI in the first postoperative year. Logistic regression analysis was used to define a reference model, which was extended with the preoperative stress test. The stress test was performed with and without reduction of the prolapse. Missing values were imputed 20 times, with bootstrap resampling for internal validation of discriminatory ability.

RESULTS

Three hundred fifty-six women could be included. POSUI occurred in 17% of the women (n = 61). The reference model included age (<55 years), point Ba of the pelvic organ prolapse quantification system (<-1), vaginal parity (≤3), subjective urinary incontinence, and MUS. The stress test had an odds ratio of 2.4 (95% confidence interval [CI], 1.2-4.6) in the extended model, which increased the optimism-corrected area under the receiver-operating curve from 0.74 to 0.76. The stress test was especially valuable in women with a 10% to 30% POSUI risk, where a stress test substantially impacted the POSUI risk. In more than 50% of the women, the stress test had no additional value in predicting POSUI.

CONCLUSION

A preoperative stress test is not valuable for women at low risk of SUI after vaginal prolapse repair.

摘要

目的

建立阴道前壁膨出修补术后压力性尿失禁(POSUI)的预测模型,并评估术前压力测试的价值。

患者与方法

对 2 项临床试验进行二次分析,这些试验将女性随机分为行或不行中尿道吊带术(MUS)的脱垂修补组。这两项试验包括伴有(CUPIDO-1,n=134)和不伴有(CUPIDO-2,n=225)共存压力性尿失禁的女性。POSUI 定义为术后 1 年手术相关或治疗相关的压力性尿失禁且需要治疗,或术后 1 年存在压力性尿失禁症状。采用逻辑回归分析建立参考模型,并扩展了术前压力测试。压力测试在脱垂复位和未复位的情况下进行。对于缺失值,采用 20 次插补,并采用 bootstrap 重采样进行内部验证。

结果

共纳入 356 例女性。17%(n=61)的女性发生 POSUI。参考模型包括年龄(<55 岁)、盆腔器官脱垂定量系统的点 Ba(<-1)、阴道分娩次数(≤3)、主观尿失禁和 MUS。在扩展模型中,压力测试的比值比为 2.4(95%置信区间[CI],1.2-4.6),使校正后的接收者操作特征曲线下面积从 0.74 增加至 0.76。在 POSUI 风险为 10%至 30%的女性中,压力测试具有更高的价值,压力测试显著改变了 POSUI 风险。在超过 50%的女性中,压力测试对预测 POSUI 没有额外价值。

结论

对于阴道前壁膨出修补术后发生压力性尿失禁风险低的女性,术前压力测试没有价值。

相似文献

1
Stress urinary incontinence after vaginal prolapse repair: development and internal validation of a prediction model with and without the stress test.阴道膨出修复术后压力性尿失禁:有无压力测试的预测模型的开发和内部验证。
Neurourol Urodyn. 2019 Apr;38(4):1086-1092. doi: 10.1002/nau.23958. Epub 2019 Mar 7.
2
The predictive value of demonstrable stress incontinence during basic office evaluation and urodynamics in women without symptomatic urinary incontinence undergoing vaginal prolapse surgery.在无症状尿失禁的阴道脱垂手术患者中,基本办公评估和尿动力学期间可明确的应激性尿失禁的预测价值。
Neurourol Urodyn. 2018 Mar;37(3):1011-1018. doi: 10.1002/nau.23384. Epub 2017 Aug 23.
3
Vaginal prolapse repair with or without a midurethral sling in women with genital prolapse and occult stress urinary incontinence: a randomized trial.伴有隐匿性压力性尿失禁的生殖器脱垂女性行阴道脱垂修复术加或不加尿道中段吊带术:一项随机试验
Int Urogynecol J. 2016 Jul;27(7):1029-38. doi: 10.1007/s00192-015-2924-1. Epub 2016 Jan 6.
4
Risk factors for stress urinary incontinence after native-tissue vaginal repair of pelvic organ prolapse.盆腔器官脱垂经阴道固有组织修复术后压力性尿失禁的危险因素。
Int J Gynaecol Obstet. 2018 Jun;141(3):349-353. doi: 10.1002/ijgo.12443. Epub 2018 Feb 2.
5
Prolapse surgery with or without incontinence procedure: a systematic review and meta-analysis.脱垂手术联合或不联合失禁手术:系统评价和荟萃分析。
BJOG. 2018 Feb;125(3):289-297. doi: 10.1111/1471-0528.14943. Epub 2017 Nov 13.
6
Transvaginal prolapse repair with or without the addition of a midurethral sling in women with genital prolapse and stress urinary incontinence: a randomised trial.经阴道脱垂修复术联合或不联合中段尿道吊带在伴有生殖道脱垂和压力性尿失禁女性中的应用:一项随机试验。
BJOG. 2015 Jun;122(7):1022-30. doi: 10.1111/1471-0528.13325. Epub 2015 Mar 9.
7
Prolapse surgery with or without stress incontinence surgery for pelvic organ prolapse: a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomised trials.脱垂手术联合或不联合压力性尿失禁手术治疗盆腔器官脱垂:随机试验的系统评价和荟萃分析。
BJOG. 2014 Apr;121(5):537-47. doi: 10.1111/1471-0528.12509. Epub 2014 Jan 2.
8
A model for predicting the risk of de novo stress urinary incontinence in women undergoing pelvic organ prolapse surgery.用于预测女性盆腔器官脱垂手术中新发压力性尿失禁风险的模型。
Obstet Gynecol. 2014 Feb;123(2 Pt 1):279-287. doi: 10.1097/AOG.0000000000000094.
9
A randomized trial of retropubic vs single-incision sling among patients undergoing vaginal prolapse repair.经阴道脱垂修复术的患者中经耻骨后与单切口吊带随机试验。
Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2024 Aug;231(2):261.e1-261.e10. doi: 10.1016/j.ajog.2024.04.036. Epub 2024 May 3.
10
External validation of a model predicting de novo stress urinary incontinence after pelvic organ prolapse surgery.经阴道子宫切除术治疗子宫脱垂术后新发压力性尿失禁预测模型的外部验证。
Neurourol Urodyn. 2021 Feb;40(2):688-694. doi: 10.1002/nau.24608. Epub 2021 Jan 25.

引用本文的文献

1
Is There a Role for Urodynamic Investigation in the Management of Pelvic Organ Prolapse?尿动力学检查在盆腔器官脱垂管理中是否有作用?
J Clin Med. 2025 Feb 11;14(4):1163. doi: 10.3390/jcm14041163.
2
Risk prediction models for stress urinary incontinence after pelvic organ prolapse (POP) surgery: a systematic review and meta-analysis.盆腔器官脱垂(POP)手术后压力性尿失禁的风险预测模型:一项系统评价和荟萃分析。
BMC Womens Health. 2025 Feb 8;25(1):55. doi: 10.1186/s12905-025-03584-8.
3
Machine-Learning-Based Predictive Model for Bothersome Stress Urinary Incontinence Among Parous Women in Southeastern China.
基于机器学习的中国东南部经产妇困扰性压力性尿失禁预测模型
Int Urogynecol J. 2025 Feb;36(2):391-401. doi: 10.1007/s00192-024-05983-1. Epub 2024 Nov 25.
4
Machine learning in female urinary incontinence: A scoping review.女性尿失禁中的机器学习:一项范围综述。
Digit Health. 2024 Oct 7;10:20552076241281450. doi: 10.1177/20552076241281450. eCollection 2024 Jan-Dec.
5
International Urogynecology consultation chapter 2 committee 3: the clinical evaluation of pelvic organ prolapse including investigations into associated morbidity/pelvic floor dysfunction.国际尿妇科咨询第二章委员会 3:盆腔器官脱垂的临床评估,包括相关发病率/盆底功能障碍的调查。
Int Urogynecol J. 2023 Nov;34(11):2657-2688. doi: 10.1007/s00192-023-05629-8. Epub 2023 Sep 22.
6
Predicting the occurrence of stress urinary incontinence after prolapse surgery: a machine learning-based model.预测盆腔器官脱垂手术后压力性尿失禁的发生:基于机器学习的模型。
Ann Transl Med. 2023 Mar 31;11(6):251. doi: 10.21037/atm-22-3648. Epub 2023 Feb 1.
7
Particle Swarm Algorithm-Based Analysis of Pelvic Dynamic MRI Images in Female Stress Urinary Incontinence.基于粒子群算法的女性压力性尿失禁盆腔动态 MRI 图像分析。
Contrast Media Mol Imaging. 2021 Jul 30;2021:8233511. doi: 10.1155/2021/8233511. eCollection 2021.