• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

面向本体表示的研究领域标准术语规范化和标准化

Ontological representation-oriented term normalization and standardization of the Research Domain Criteria.

作者信息

Li Fang, Rao Guozheng, Du Jingcheng, Xiang Yang, Zhang Yaoyun, Selek Salih, Hamilton Jane Elizabeth, Xu Hua, Tao Cui

机构信息

The University of Texas Health Science Center at Houston, USA.

Tianjin University, China.

出版信息

Health Informatics J. 2020 Jun;26(2):726-737. doi: 10.1177/1460458219832059. Epub 2019 Mar 7.

DOI:10.1177/1460458219832059
PMID:30843449
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC7863676/
Abstract

The Research Domain Criteria, launched by the National Institute of Mental Health, is a new dimensional and interdisciplinary research framework for mental disorders. The Research Domain Criteria matrix is its core part. Since an ontology has the strengths of supporting semantic inferencing and automatic data processing, we would like to transform the Research Domain Criteria matrix into an ontological structure. In terms of data normalization, which is the essential part of an ontology representation, the Research Domain Criteria elements (mainly in the Units of Analysis) have some limitations. In this article, we propose a series of solutions to improve data normalization of the Research Domain Criteria elements in the Units of Analysis, including leveraging standard terminologies (i.e. the Unified Medical Language System Metathesaurus), context-combining queries, and domain expertise. The evaluation results show the positive (Yes) percentage is more than 80 percent, indicating our work is favorably received by the mental health professionals, and we have formed a good data foundation for the Research Domain Criteria ontological representation in the future work.

摘要

由美国国立精神卫生研究所发起的研究领域标准(Research Domain Criteria)是一种针对精神障碍的全新维度和跨学科研究框架。研究领域标准矩阵是其核心部分。由于本体具有支持语义推理和自动数据处理的优势,我们希望将研究领域标准矩阵转化为本体结构。在作为本体表示重要组成部分的数据规范化方面,研究领域标准元素(主要在分析单元中)存在一些局限性。在本文中,我们提出了一系列解决方案,以改进分析单元中研究领域标准元素的数据规范化,包括利用标准术语(即统一医学语言系统叙词表)、上下文组合查询和领域专业知识。评估结果表明,肯定(是)百分比超过80%,这表明我们的工作受到了心理健康专业人员的好评,并且我们在未来的工作中为研究领域标准本体表示奠定了良好的数据基础。

相似文献

1
Ontological representation-oriented term normalization and standardization of the Research Domain Criteria.面向本体表示的研究领域标准术语规范化和标准化
Health Informatics J. 2020 Jun;26(2):726-737. doi: 10.1177/1460458219832059. Epub 2019 Mar 7.
2
An ontological analysis of the UMLS Metathesaurus.对统一医学语言系统元词表的本体分析。
Proc AMIA Symp. 1998:810-4.
3
Semantic enrichment for medical ontologies.医学本体的语义丰富
J Biomed Inform. 2006 Apr;39(2):209-26. doi: 10.1016/j.jbi.2005.08.001. Epub 2005 Sep 9.
4
The interaction of domain knowledge and linguistic structure in natural language processing: interpreting hypernymic propositions in biomedical text.自然语言处理中领域知识与语言结构的相互作用:解读生物医学文本中的上位命题
J Biomed Inform. 2003 Dec;36(6):462-77. doi: 10.1016/j.jbi.2003.11.003.
5
Ontological and Non-Ontological Resources for Associating Medical Dictionary for Regulatory Activities Terms to SNOMED Clinical Terms With Semantic Properties.用于将监管活动医学词典术语与具有语义属性的SNOMED临床术语相关联的本体论和非本体论资源。
Front Pharmacol. 2019 Sep 10;10:975. doi: 10.3389/fphar.2019.00975. eCollection 2019.
6
Reuse of termino-ontological resources and text corpora for building a multilingual domain ontology: an application to Alzheimer's disease.术语本体资源和文本语料库的再利用构建多语言领域本体:在阿尔茨海默病中的应用。
J Biomed Inform. 2014 Apr;48:171-82. doi: 10.1016/j.jbi.2013.12.013. Epub 2013 Dec 29.
7
Putting data integration into practice: using biomedical terminologies to add structure to existing data sources.将数据整合付诸实践:利用生物医学术语为现有数据源增添结构。
AMIA Annu Symp Proc. 2003;2003:125-9.
8
The Meta-1.2 engine: a refined strategy for linking biomedical vocabularies.Meta-1.2引擎:一种用于连接生物医学词汇的优化策略。
Proc Annu Symp Comput Appl Med Care. 1992:304-8.
9
Representing the UMLS as an object-oriented database: modeling issues and advantages.将统一医学语言系统表示为面向对象数据库:建模问题与优势。
J Am Med Inform Assoc. 2000 Jan-Feb;7(1):66-80. doi: 10.1136/jamia.2000.0070066.
10
Partitioning the UMLS semantic network.对统一医学语言系统语义网络进行划分。
IEEE Trans Inf Technol Biomed. 2002 Jun;6(2):102-8. doi: 10.1109/titb.2002.1006296.

本文引用的文献

1
Data Science in the Research Domain Criteria Era: Relevance of Machine Learning to the Study of Stress Pathology, Recovery, and Resilience.研究领域标准时代的数据科学:机器学习与应激病理学、恢复和复原力研究的相关性。
Chronic Stress (Thousand Oaks). 2018 Jan-Dec;2. doi: 10.1177/2470547017747553. Epub 2018 Jan 10.
2
Implications of the Research Domain Criteria project for childhood anxiety and its disorders.研究领域标准项目对儿童焦虑及其障碍的影响。
Clin Psychol Rev. 2018 Aug;64:99-109. doi: 10.1016/j.cpr.2018.01.005. Epub 2018 Jan 31.
3
Assessing the practice of biomedical ontology evaluation: Gaps and opportunities.评估生物医学本体评估实践:差距与机遇。
J Biomed Inform. 2018 Apr;80:1-13. doi: 10.1016/j.jbi.2018.02.010. Epub 2018 Feb 17.
4
Levels of Cognitive Control: A Functional Magnetic Resonance Imaging-Based Test of an RDoC Domain Across Bipolar Disorder and Schizophrenia.认知控制水平:基于功能磁共振成像的双相障碍和精神分裂症 RDoC 领域测试。
Neuropsychopharmacology. 2018 Feb;43(3):598-606. doi: 10.1038/npp.2017.233. Epub 2017 Sep 26.
5
Research Domain Criteria Constructs: Integrative reviews and empirical perspectives.研究领域标准构建:综合评论与实证观点。
J Affect Disord. 2017 Jul;216:1-2. doi: 10.1016/j.jad.2017.05.028.
6
Ontological Realism for the Research Domain Criteria for Mental Disorders.精神障碍研究领域标准的本体论实在论
Stud Health Technol Inform. 2017;235:431-435.
7
Research domain criteria (RDoC) grows up: Strengthening neurodevelopment investigation within the RDoC framework.研究领域标准(RDoC)的发展:在RDoC框架内加强神经发育研究。
J Affect Disord. 2017 Jul;216:30-35. doi: 10.1016/j.jad.2016.12.011. Epub 2016 Dec 16.
8
Self-report indicators of negative valence constructs within the research domain criteria (RDoC): A critical review.自我报告的负价建构在研究领域标准(RDoC)内的指标:批判性评价。
J Affect Disord. 2017 Jul;216:58-69. doi: 10.1016/j.jad.2016.09.065. Epub 2016 Oct 28.
9
The NIMH Research Domain Criteria Initiative: Background, Issues, and Pragmatics.美国国立精神卫生研究所研究领域标准计划:背景、问题与务实做法
Psychophysiology. 2016 Mar;53(3):286-97. doi: 10.1111/psyp.12518.
10
Observational Health Data Sciences and Informatics (OHDSI): Opportunities for Observational Researchers.观察性健康数据科学与信息学(OHDSI):观察性研究人员的机遇。
Stud Health Technol Inform. 2015;216:574-8.