Nguyen Cong Luat, Lee Andy H, Minh Pham Ngoc, Hoang Nguyen Phung Thi, Ha Anh Vo Van, Khac Chu Tan, Van Duong Dat, Thi Duong Hong, Binns Colin W
National Institute of Hygiene and Epidemiology, Hanoi, Vietnam.
School of Public Health, Curtin University, Perth, Australia.
J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med. 2020 Nov;33(21):3706-3712. doi: 10.1080/14767058.2019.1583733. Epub 2019 Mar 7.
Several diagnostic criteria for gestational diabetes mellitus (GDM) have been developed and used internationally. This study estimated the prevalence of GDM and pregnancy outcomes among Vietnamese women. A prospective cohort study of 2030 women was undertaken in Vietnam between 2015 and 2016. Baseline interview and a single-step 75-g oral glucose tolerance test (OGTT) were conducted at 24-28 weeks of gestation. GDM was defined by five international diagnostic criteria: America Diabetes Association (ADA), European Association for the Study of Diabetes (EASD), International Association of the Diabetes and Pregnancy study groups (IADPSG), National Institute of Health and Clinical Excellence (NICE), and World Health Organization (WHO). Maternal and neonatal outcomes were assessed using medical records. Besides descriptive statistics and univariate analyses, logistic regressions were performed to ascertain the associations between GDM and maternal and neonatal outcomes. The prevalence of GDM varied considerably by the diagnostic criteria: 6.4% (ADA), 7.9% (EASD), 22.8% (IADPSG/WHO), and 24.2% (NICE). Women with GDM according to EASD were more likely to have macrosomic infants (adjusted odds ratio (OR) 4.35, 95% confidence interval [CI]: 1.49-12.72), despite no apparent increase in risk under other criteria. Babies born to mothers with GDM appeared to be large-for-gestational age (LGA) by ADA criteria (adjusted OR 2.10, 95% CI: 1.10-4.02) or EASD criteria (adjusted OR 2.15, 95% CI: 1.16-3.98), when compared to their counterparts in the normal group. No significant differences in maternal and other neonatal outcomes were found between the normal and GDM groups. A global guideline is needed for the diagnosis, prevention and management of GDM.
国际上已经制定并使用了几种妊娠期糖尿病(GDM)的诊断标准。本研究估计了越南女性中GDM的患病率及妊娠结局。2015年至2016年期间,在越南对2030名女性进行了一项前瞻性队列研究。在妊娠24 - 28周时进行了基线访谈和一步法75克口服葡萄糖耐量试验(OGTT)。GDM由五项国际诊断标准定义:美国糖尿病协会(ADA)、欧洲糖尿病研究协会(EASD)、国际糖尿病与妊娠研究组协会(IADPSG)、英国国家卫生与临床优化研究所(NICE)和世界卫生组织(WHO)。使用医疗记录评估母婴结局。除了描述性统计和单因素分析外,还进行了逻辑回归以确定GDM与母婴结局之间的关联。根据诊断标准,GDM的患病率差异很大:ADA标准为6.4%,EASD标准为7.9%,IADPSG/WHO标准为22.8%,NICE标准为24.2%。尽管根据其他标准风险没有明显增加,但按照EASD标准诊断为GDM的女性更有可能生出巨大儿(调整后的优势比(OR)为4.35,95%置信区间[CI]:1.49 - 12.72)。与正常组的婴儿相比,按照ADA标准(调整后的OR为2.10,95% CI:1.10 - 4.02)或EASD标准(调整后的OR为2.15,95% CI:1.16 - 3.98),GDM母亲所生的婴儿似乎为大于胎龄儿(LGA)。正常组和GDM组之间在母亲和其他新生儿结局方面未发现显著差异。需要一个关于GDM诊断、预防和管理的全球指南。