Walker Cynthia A, Rahman Alphonsa, Gipson-Jones Trina L, Harris Ché Matthew
Cynthia A. Walker, MSN, RN, APRN-CNS, CWON, Interprofessional Practice & Patient Safety, Johns Hopkins Bayview Medical Center, Baltimore, Maryland. Alphonsa Rahman, DNP, APRN-CNS, CCRN, Interprofessional Practice & Patient Safety, Johns Hopkins Bayview Medical Center, Baltimore, Maryland. Trina L. Gipson-Jones, PhD, Hampton University, School of Nursing, Hampton, Virginia. Ché Matthew Harris, MD, MS, FACP, Department of General Internal Medicine, Johns Hopkins School of Medicine, Joint Appointment Johns Hopkins School of Nursing, Division of Hospital Medicine, Collaborative Inpatient Medicine Service, Baltimore, Maryland.
J Wound Ostomy Continence Nurs. 2019 Mar/Apr;46(2):98-105. doi: 10.1097/WON.0000000000000512.
The purpose of this quality improvement project was to determine hospitalists' knowledge, practices, and perspectives related to management of pressure injuries and neuropathic/diabetic foot complications (having a foot ulcer or subsequent development of a foot infection because of a foot ulcer). We also sought to identify resources for and knowledge-based barriers to management of these wounds. This quality improvement effort targeted an interdisciplinary group of 55 hospitalists in internal medicine that consisted of 8 nurse practitioners, 10 physician assistants, and 38 physicians. The site of this initiative was the Johns Hopkins Bayview Medical Center, a 342-bed academic hospital located in the mid-Atlantic United States (Baltimore Maryland). The first phase of our quality improvement project comprised an online survey to identify hospitalists' knowledge, practices, and opinions on inpatient management of pressure injuries and diabetic foot complications. The second phase involved semistructured focus groups attended by hospitalists to identify resource gaps and barriers inferred by survey results. Twenty-nine of 55 (52%) hospitalists responded to the survey; 72% indicated no formal training in wound care. Over 90% had little to no confidence in management of pressure injuries and diabetic foot complications. In a separate ranking section of the survey, respondents selected lack of knowledge/confidence 12 of 29 (41.3%) and resources 9 of 29 (31.0%) as number 1 barriers to wound care. Managing patients with obesity was identified as a second major barrier from 10 of 29 selected options (34.5%). Eighteen of 55 (33%) hospitalists attended focus group sessions acknowledging barriers to wound care that included provider education, information technology, system factors, and interprofessional engagement. Attendees welcomed additional educational and ancillary resource support.
这个质量改进项目的目的是确定住院医师在压力性损伤以及神经性/糖尿病足并发症(足部溃疡或因足部溃疡继发足部感染)管理方面的知识、实践和观点。我们还试图找出这些伤口管理的资源以及基于知识的障碍。这项质量改进工作针对的是55名内科住院医师组成的跨学科团队,其中包括8名执业护士、10名医师助理和38名医生。该项目的实施地点是约翰霍普金斯湾景医疗中心,这是一家位于美国大西洋中部地区(马里兰州巴尔的摩)、拥有342张床位的学术医院。我们质量改进项目的第一阶段包括一项在线调查,以确定住院医师对压力性损伤和糖尿病足并发症住院管理的知识、实践和看法。第二阶段涉及由住院医师参加的半结构化焦点小组,以确定调查结果所推断出的资源差距和障碍。55名住院医师中有29名(52%)回复了调查;72%的人表示没有接受过伤口护理方面的正规培训。超过90%的人对压力性损伤和糖尿病足并发症的管理几乎没有信心。在调查的一个单独排名部分,29名受访者中有12名(41.3%)选择知识/信心不足,9名(31.0%)选择资源缺乏作为伤口护理的首要障碍。在29个选定选项中,有10个(34.5%)将肥胖患者的管理确定为第二个主要障碍。55名住院医师中有18名(33%)参加了焦点小组会议,他们承认伤口护理存在障碍,包括提供者教育、信息技术、系统因素和跨专业参与。与会者欢迎更多的教育和辅助资源支持。