Nahleh Zeina, Botrus Gehan, Dwivedi Alok, Jennings Michael, Nagy Shaimaa, Tfayli Arafat
Department of Hematology-Oncology, Maroone Cancer Center, Cleveland Clinic Florida, Weston, FL 33331, USA.
Department of Internal Medicine, Texas Tech University Health Sciences Center, El Paso, TX 79912, USA.
Mol Clin Oncol. 2019 Mar;10(3):357-365. doi: 10.3892/mco.2019.1796. Epub 2019 Jan 2.
Several randomized clinical trials have suggested the effectiveness of bevacizumab (Bev) in early and advanced breast cancer; however, due to the increased toxicity and lack of a clear long-term survival benefit, there is currently no defined role for Bev in breast cancer in the USA, while it has been approved in Europe. We herein sought to conduct a meta-analysis of large randomized trials comparing the efficacy and long-term outcome of neoadjuvant chemotherapy with Bev compared with chemotherapy without Bev in human epidermal factor receptor 2 (HER2)-negative breast cancer. A search was conducted through PubMed and Ovid Medline databases. Among the 279 articles identified, 5 met the eligibility criteria and were included in the present analysis. A total of 2,268 patients treated with Bev and 2,278 treated without Bev were analyzed. Pathological complete response (pCR) was obtained in 35% of patients treated with Bev and in 26% of those treated without Bev. A statistically significant increase (26%) in the incidence of pCR was observed in the Bev-treated group. However, patients treated with Bev exhibited no significant difference in the risk of disease recurrence or death. To the best of our knowledge, this is the first meta-analysis addressing the long-term outcomes of Bev in combination with chemotherapy in the neoadjuvant treatment of HER2-negative breast cancer. The results confirmed the significant benefit of Bev combined with chemotherapy compared with chemotherapy alone on breast cancer response, in both triple-negative and hormone receptor-positive cases. However, this benefit does not translate into a long-term disease-free or definitive overall survival advantage. Optimizing patient selection is desirable for maximizing the long-term benefits of Bev, while reducing cost and treatment-related adverse effects. Future efforts directed toward the discovery of predictive markers would be crucial for identifying the subset(s) of breast cancer patients who are most likely to benefit from Bev therapy.
多项随机临床试验表明贝伐单抗(Bev)在早期和晚期乳腺癌中具有疗效;然而,由于毒性增加且缺乏明确的长期生存获益,目前在美国乳腺癌治疗中贝伐单抗尚无明确作用,而在欧洲它已获批准。我们在此进行一项大型随机试验的荟萃分析,比较在人表皮生长因子受体2(HER2)阴性乳腺癌中,新辅助化疗联合贝伐单抗与不联合贝伐单抗的疗效及长期预后。通过PubMed和Ovid Medline数据库进行检索。在识别出的279篇文章中,5篇符合纳入标准并纳入本分析。共分析了2268例接受贝伐单抗治疗的患者和2278例未接受贝伐单抗治疗的患者。接受贝伐单抗治疗的患者中35%获得病理完全缓解(pCR),未接受贝伐单抗治疗的患者中这一比例为26%。在接受贝伐单抗治疗的组中观察到pCR发生率有统计学意义的增加(26%)。然而,接受贝伐单抗治疗的患者在疾病复发或死亡风险方面无显著差异。据我们所知,这是第一项针对贝伐单抗联合化疗在HER2阴性乳腺癌新辅助治疗中的长期预后的荟萃分析。结果证实,在三阴性和激素受体阳性病例中,与单纯化疗相比,贝伐单抗联合化疗对乳腺癌反应有显著益处。然而,这种益处并未转化为长期无病生存或明确的总生存优势。为了使贝伐单抗的长期益处最大化,同时降低成本和治疗相关不良反应,优化患者选择是可取的。未来致力于发现预测标志物的努力对于识别最可能从贝伐单抗治疗中获益的乳腺癌患者亚组至关重要。