Soria-Comes Teresa, Palomar-Abril Vicente, Ureste María Martín, Guerola Mónica Tallón, Maiques Inmaculada Concepción Maestu
Department of Medical Oncology, Hospital Universitario Doctor Peset, 46017, Comunitat Valenciana, Valencia, Spain.
Department of Medical Oncology, Hospital Universitario Doctor Peset, Comunitat Valenciana, Valencia, Spain.
Pathol Oncol Res. 2020 Apr;26(2):845-851. doi: 10.1007/s12253-019-00628-x. Epub 2019 Mar 7.
EGFR-mutated non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) has significant improved outcomes when treated with EGFR-tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKI). Thus, EGFR-mutational status should be assessed at diagnosis and in the course of treatment with TKI. However, tissue samples are not always evaluable, and molecular profiling has been increasingly performed in cell-free tumor DNA (ctDNA) from blood samples. Our objective is to evaluate the reliability of ctDNA profiling in plasma samples in a real-world setting. We retrospectively analyzed the patients diagnosed with non-squamous NSCLC from May 2016 to December 2017 at Hospital Universitario Doctor Peset who had been tested for EGFR mutations in tissue and plasma samples. Both samples were sent to an external laboratory to perform the analysis by the cobas® EGFR assay. Percentage of agreement and concordance were calculated by kappa statistic. Of 102 patients reviewed, 89 were eligible. The overall EGFR mutation frequency was 18.6% for the evaluable tissue samples and 19.6% for evaluable plasma samples. Mutation status concordance between matched samples was 87.4%. Cohen's kappa index (κ) = 0.6 (sensitivity 70.6%, specificity 91.7%, positive predictive value 66.7%, negative predictive value 93%). When concordance was stablished only in stage IV tumors κ = 0.7, suggesting a higher agreement in advanced disease. This real-world data suggest that plasma is a feasible sample for ctDNA EGFR mutation assessment. Results of ctDNA molecular profiling are reliable when using a validated technique such as the cobas® EGFR assay, especially in patients that cannot undergo a tissue biopsy.
表皮生长因子受体(EGFR)突变的非小细胞肺癌(NSCLC)患者接受EGFR酪氨酸激酶抑制剂(TKI)治疗后,预后有显著改善。因此,在诊断时以及TKI治疗过程中均应评估EGFR突变状态。然而,组织样本并非总是可评估的,于是越来越多地通过血液样本中的游离肿瘤DNA(ctDNA)进行分子分析。我们的目的是在真实环境中评估血浆样本中ctDNA分析的可靠性。我们回顾性分析了2016年5月至2017年12月在博士佩塞特大学医院被诊断为非鳞状NSCLC的患者,这些患者的组织和血浆样本均接受了EGFR突变检测。两个样本均被送往外部实验室,通过cobas®EGFR检测进行分析。一致性百分比和符合率通过kappa统计量计算。在102例接受评估的患者中,89例符合条件。可评估组织样本的总体EGFR突变频率为18.6%,可评估血浆样本为19.6%。匹配样本之间的突变状态符合率为87.4%。科恩kappa指数(κ)=0.6(敏感性70.6%,特异性91.7%,阳性预测值66.7%,阴性预测值93%)。仅在IV期肿瘤中确定符合率时,κ=0.7,表明在晚期疾病中一致性更高。这些真实数据表明,血浆是用于ctDNA EGFR突变评估的可行样本。使用经过验证的技术(如cobas®EGFR检测)时,ctDNA分子分析结果是可靠的,尤其是在无法进行组织活检的患者中。