• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

嗅神经母细胞瘤的扩散加权成像:与其他鼻腔鼻窦肿块的鉴别诊断。

Diffusion weighted imaging of esthesioneuroblastoma: Differentiation from other sinonasal masses.

机构信息

Department of Radiology, Kaiser Permanente Oakland Medical Center, Oakland, California.

Department of Otolaryngology - Head and Neck Surgery, University of California San Francisco, San Francisco, California.

出版信息

Head Neck. 2019 May;41(5):1161-1164. doi: 10.1002/hed.25365. Epub 2019 Mar 7.

DOI:10.1002/hed.25365
PMID:30848032
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Differentiating esthesioneuroblastoma (ENB) from other sinonasal tumors is difficult by MRI. We tested whether diffusion weighted imaging (DWI) could distinguish ENB from other sinonasal tumors.

METHODS

Hundred forty-six patients underwent sinonasal MRI, 75 with technically successful DWI. Pathology: 18 ENB (24%), 34 (45%) other malignant tumors, and 23 (31%) benign lesions. Apparent diffusion coefficients (ADCs) were calculated.

RESULTS

Average ADC and normalized ADC of ENB (1.22 × 10 ± 0.28 mm /s and 1.55 ± 0.36, respectively) were higher than other malignancies (0.98 × 10 ± 0.18 mm /s and 1.31 ± 0.29, P = .002 and P = .034) and lower than benign disease (1.92 × 10 ± 0.33 mm /s and 2.44 ± 0.50, P < .0001). ADC differentiated ENB from benign disease with 91% sensitivity and 83% specificity. An ADC cutoff of 1.1 × 10 mm /s differentiated other malignancies from ENB with 72% sensitivity and 85% specificity.

CONCLUSIONS

DWI is useful in distinguishing ENB from other sinonasal disease.

摘要

背景

磁共振成像(MRI)难以区分嗅神经母细胞瘤(ENB)和其他鼻腔鼻窦肿瘤。我们检测了弥散加权成像(DWI)是否能区分 ENB 和其他鼻腔鼻窦肿瘤。

方法

146 例患者接受了鼻腔鼻窦 MRI 检查,其中 75 例技术上成功进行了 DWI。病理结果:18 例 ENB(24%)、34 例(45%)其他恶性肿瘤和 23 例(31%)良性病变。计算表观弥散系数(ADC)。

结果

ENB 的平均 ADC 和标准化 ADC(分别为 1.22×10±0.28mm/s 和 1.55±0.36)高于其他恶性肿瘤(分别为 0.98×10±0.18mm/s 和 1.31±0.29,P=0.002 和 P=0.034),低于良性病变(分别为 1.92×10±0.33mm/s 和 2.44±0.50,P<0.0001)。ADC 以 91%的灵敏度和 83%的特异性区分 ENB 与良性疾病。ADC 截断值为 1.1×10mm/s 时,以 72%的灵敏度和 85%的特异性区分其他恶性肿瘤与 ENB。

结论

DWI 有助于区分 ENB 和其他鼻腔鼻窦疾病。

相似文献

1
Diffusion weighted imaging of esthesioneuroblastoma: Differentiation from other sinonasal masses.嗅神经母细胞瘤的扩散加权成像:与其他鼻腔鼻窦肿块的鉴别诊断。
Head Neck. 2019 May;41(5):1161-1164. doi: 10.1002/hed.25365. Epub 2019 Mar 7.
2
High-Resolution Diffusion-Weighted Imaging Improves the Diagnostic Accuracy of Dynamic Contrast-Enhanced Sinonasal Magnetic Resonance Imaging.高分辨率扩散加权成像提高了动态对比增强鼻窦磁共振成像的诊断准确性。
J Comput Assist Tomogr. 2017 Mar/Apr;41(2):199-205. doi: 10.1097/RCT.0000000000000502.
3
Diffusion kurtosis imaging for differentiating between the benign and malignant sinonasal lesions.扩散峰度成像用于鉴别鼻窦良性和恶性病变。
J Magn Reson Imaging. 2017 May;45(5):1446-1454. doi: 10.1002/jmri.25500. Epub 2016 Oct 19.
4
Diffusion-weighted magnetic resonance imaging of the paranasal sinuses: A systematic review.鼻旁窦的扩散加权磁共振成像:一项系统综述。
Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol. 2018 Dec;126(6):521-536. doi: 10.1016/j.oooo.2018.07.004. Epub 2018 Jul 21.
5
Differentiation of Benign From Malignant Sinonasal Masses Using Diffusion Weighted Imaging and Dynamic Contrast Enhanced Magnetic Resonance Imaging.应用扩散加权成像和动态对比增强磁共振成像鉴别良恶性鼻-鼻窦肿块。
Am J Rhinol Allergy. 2022 Mar;36(2):207-215. doi: 10.1177/19458924211040602. Epub 2021 Sep 5.
6
Intravoxel Incoherent Motion MR Imaging in the Differentiation of Benign and Malignant Sinonasal Lesions: Comparison with Conventional Diffusion-Weighted MR Imaging.体素内不相干运动磁共振成像在鉴别良恶性鼻窦病变中的应用:与常规弥散加权磁共振成像的比较。
AJNR Am J Neuroradiol. 2018 Mar;39(3):538-546. doi: 10.3174/ajnr.A5532. Epub 2018 Jan 25.
7
Differentiation between sinonasal natural killer/T-cell lymphomas and diffuse large B-cell lymphomas by RESOLVE DWI combined with conventional MRI.通过 RESOLVE DWI 联合常规 MRI 对鼻腔鼻窦自然杀伤/T 细胞淋巴瘤和弥漫性大 B 细胞淋巴瘤进行鉴别。
Magn Reson Imaging. 2019 Oct;62:10-17. doi: 10.1016/j.mri.2019.06.011. Epub 2019 Jun 15.
8
Intravoxel incoherent motion MRI for differentiating sinonasal small round cell malignant tumours (SRCMTs) from Non-SRCMTs: comparison and correlation with dynamic contrast-enhanced MRI.体素内不相干运动磁共振成像用于鉴别鼻窦小圆形细胞恶性肿瘤(SRCMTs)与非SRCMTs:与动态对比增强磁共振成像的比较及相关性
Clin Radiol. 2018 Nov;73(11):966-974. doi: 10.1016/j.crad.2018.07.097. Epub 2018 Aug 4.
9
Improved performance in differentiating benign from malignant sinonasal tumors using diffusion-weighted combined with dynamic contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance imaging.使用扩散加权成像结合动态对比增强磁共振成像在鉴别鼻窦良性肿瘤与恶性肿瘤方面的性能改善。
Chin Med J (Engl). 2015 Mar 5;128(5):586-92. doi: 10.4103/0366-6999.151649.
10
Does sophisticated diagnostic workup on neuroectodermal tumors have an impact on the treatment of esthesioneuroblastoma?对神经外胚层肿瘤进行复杂的诊断检查对嗅神经母细胞瘤的治疗有影响吗?
Onkologie. 2003 Jun;26(3):261-7. doi: 10.1159/000071622.

引用本文的文献

1
Time-Saving 3D MR Imaging Protocols with Millimeter and Submillimeter Isotropic Spatial Resolution for Face and Neck Imaging as Implemented at a Single-Site Major Referral Center.毫米和亚毫米各向同性空间分辨率的省时 3D MR 成像方案在单站点主要转诊中心实现的面颈部成像
AJNR Am J Neuroradiol. 2024 Jun 7;45(6):737-742. doi: 10.3174/ajnr.A8184.
2
Differentiating sinonasal malignant melanoma from squamous cell carcinoma using DWI combined with conventional MRI.弥散加权成像联合常规 MRI 鉴别鼻腔鼻窦恶性黑色素瘤与鳞状细胞癌。
Neuroradiology. 2023 Aug;65(8):1263-1270. doi: 10.1007/s00234-023-03164-3. Epub 2023 May 20.
3
Whole-body hybrid positron emission tomography imaging yields clinically relevant information in the staging and restaging of sinonasal tumors.
全身混合正电子发射断层成像在鼻窦肿瘤的分期和再分期中提供具有临床意义的信息。
Head Neck. 2021 Nov;43(11):3572-3585. doi: 10.1002/hed.26856. Epub 2021 Sep 13.
4
Apparent Diffusion Coefficient for Distinguishing Between Malignant and Benign Lesions in the Head and Neck Region: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.表观扩散系数用于鉴别头颈部恶性与良性病变:一项系统评价和Meta分析
Front Oncol. 2020 Jan 8;9:1362. doi: 10.3389/fonc.2019.01362. eCollection 2019.