• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

植食性昆虫何时会发生竞争?基于系统发育的荟萃分析。

When do herbivorous insects compete? A phylogenetic meta-analysis.

机构信息

Department of Entomology and Plant Pathology, Auburn University, Auburn, AL, USA.

School of Fisheries, Aquaculture, and Aquatic Sciences, Auburn University, Auburn, AL, USA.

出版信息

Ecol Lett. 2019 May;22(5):875-883. doi: 10.1111/ele.13245. Epub 2019 Mar 7.

DOI:10.1111/ele.13245
PMID:30848045
Abstract

When herbivorous insects interact, they can increase or decrease each other's fitness. As it stands, we know little of what causes this variation. Classic competition theory predicts that competition will increase with niche overlap and population density. And classic hypotheses of herbivorous insect diversification predict that diet specialists will be superior competitors to generalists. Here, we test these predictions using phylogenetic meta-analysis. We estimate the effects of diet breadth, population density and proxies of niche overlap: phylogenetic relatedness, physical proximity and feeding-guild membership. As predicted, we find that competition between herbivorous insects increases with population density as well as phylogenetic and physical proximity. Contrary to predictions, competition tends to be stronger between than within feeding guilds and affects specialists as much as generalists. This is the first statistical evidence that niche overlap increases competition between herbivorous insects. However, niche overlap is not everything; complex feeding guild effects indicate important indirect interactions.

摘要

当草食性昆虫相互作用时,它们可以增加或减少彼此的适合度。目前,我们对导致这种变化的原因知之甚少。经典的竞争理论预测,竞争会随着生态位重叠和种群密度的增加而增加。经典的草食性昆虫多样化假说预测,食性专化者将比广食者更具竞争力。在这里,我们使用系统发育元分析来检验这些预测。我们估计了饮食广度、种群密度和生态位重叠的替代指标(系统发育关系、物理接近度和取食群组成员)的影响。正如预测的那样,我们发现草食性昆虫之间的竞争随着种群密度以及系统发育和物理接近度的增加而增加。与预测相反的是,竞争往往在取食群内比取食群间更强,并且对专食者和广食者的影响相同。这是统计证据首次表明生态位重叠会增加草食性昆虫之间的竞争。然而,生态位重叠并不是一切;复杂的取食群效应表明存在重要的间接相互作用。

相似文献

1
When do herbivorous insects compete? A phylogenetic meta-analysis.植食性昆虫何时会发生竞争?基于系统发育的荟萃分析。
Ecol Lett. 2019 May;22(5):875-883. doi: 10.1111/ele.13245. Epub 2019 Mar 7.
2
Interspecific interactions in phytophagous insects revisited: a quantitative assessment of competition theory.植食性昆虫种间相互作用再探讨:竞争理论的定量评估
Ecol Lett. 2007 Oct;10(10):977-94. doi: 10.1111/j.1461-0248.2007.01093.x.
3
Nonadaptive radiation: Pervasive diet specialization by drift in scale insects?非适应性辐射:介壳虫通过随机漂变实现普遍的食性特化?
Evolution. 2016 Oct;70(10):2421-2428. doi: 10.1111/evo.13036. Epub 2016 Sep 1.
4
Phylogenetic analysis of trophic niche evolution reveals a latitudinal herbivory gradient in Clupeoidei (herrings, anchovies, and allies).食性生态位进化的系统发育分析揭示了鲱形目(鲱鱼、鳀鱼及其近缘种)的纬度草食性梯度。
Mol Phylogenet Evol. 2018 Jul;124:151-161. doi: 10.1016/j.ympev.2018.03.011. Epub 2018 Mar 15.
5
Bottom-up vs. top-down effects on terrestrial insect herbivores: a meta-analysis.上下位效应对陆生昆虫食草动物的影响:一项荟萃分析。
Ecol Lett. 2018 Jan;21(1):138-150. doi: 10.1111/ele.12874. Epub 2017 Nov 2.
6
Related herbivore species show similar temporal dynamics.相关食草物种表现出相似的时间动态。
J Anim Ecol. 2018 May;87(3):801-812. doi: 10.1111/1365-2656.12807. Epub 2018 Mar 13.
7
To each its own: differential response of specialist and generalist herbivores to plant defence in willows.各有所好:专食性和广食性食草动物对柳树植物防御的差异反应
J Anim Ecol. 2015 Jul;84(4):1123-32. doi: 10.1111/1365-2656.12349. Epub 2015 Mar 3.
8
Specialization and generalization in the diversification of phytophagous insects: tests of the musical chairs and oscillation hypotheses.植食性昆虫多样化中的特化与泛化:音乐椅假说和振荡假说的检验
Proc Biol Sci. 2014 Nov 22;281(1795). doi: 10.1098/rspb.2013.2960.
9
The global distribution of diet breadth in insect herbivores.昆虫食草动物饮食广度的全球分布。
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2015 Jan 13;112(2):442-7. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1423042112. Epub 2014 Dec 29.
10
Patterns of host plant utilization and diversification in the brush-footed butterflies.蛱蝶科蝴蝶对寄主植物的利用模式与多样化
Evolution. 2015 Mar;69(3):589-601. doi: 10.1111/evo.12593. Epub 2015 Jan 24.

引用本文的文献

1
Tri-trophic interactions among , Tephritid species and host plants suggest apparent competition.实蝇物种与寄主植物之间的三级营养相互作用表明存在明显的竞争。
Ecol Evol. 2023 Jan 11;13(1):e9742. doi: 10.1002/ece3.9742. eCollection 2023 Jan.
2
Gut microbiota contributes to lignocellulose deconstruction and nitrogen fixation of the larva of .肠道微生物群有助于[具体物种]幼虫的木质纤维素解构和固氮作用。 (原文中“of the larva of.”后面缺少具体物种信息)
Front Physiol. 2022 Dec 23;13:1072893. doi: 10.3389/fphys.2022.1072893. eCollection 2022.
3
A robust and readily implementable method for the meta-analysis of response ratios with and without missing standard deviations.
一种稳健且易于实施的方法,用于对存在和不存在缺失标准差的反应比进行荟萃分析。
Ecol Lett. 2023 Feb;26(2):232-244. doi: 10.1111/ele.14144. Epub 2022 Dec 26.
4
Delaying quantitative resistance to pesticides and antibiotics.延缓对杀虫剂和抗生素的定量抗性。
Evol Appl. 2022 Oct 25;15(12):2067-2077. doi: 10.1111/eva.13497. eCollection 2022 Dec.
5
Acoustic indices as proxies for biodiversity: a meta-analysis.声学生物指标作为生物多样性的代理指标:一项荟萃分析。
Biol Rev Camb Philos Soc. 2022 Dec;97(6):2209-2236. doi: 10.1111/brv.12890. Epub 2022 Aug 17.
6
Modelling interference between vectors of non-persistently transmitted plant viruses to identify effective control strategies.建立非持久性传播植物病毒间干扰模型,以确定有效的控制策略。
PLoS Comput Biol. 2021 Dec 28;17(12):e1009727. doi: 10.1371/journal.pcbi.1009727. eCollection 2021 Dec.
7
The Evolution of Endophagy in Herbivorous Insects.植食性昆虫中内质网自噬的进化
Front Plant Sci. 2020 Nov 2;11:581816. doi: 10.3389/fpls.2020.581816. eCollection 2020.
8
Do major host shifts spark diversification in butterflies?主要宿主转移会引发蝴蝶的物种多样化吗?
Ecol Evol. 2020 Feb 26;10(8):3636-3646. doi: 10.1002/ece3.6116. eCollection 2020 Apr.