Suppr超能文献

头颈部和胸部正电子发射断层扫描/计算机断层扫描对巨细胞动脉炎的诊断准确性:一项前瞻性、双盲、横断面研究。

Diagnostic Accuracy of Positron Emission Tomography/Computed Tomography of the Head, Neck, and Chest for Giant Cell Arteritis: A Prospective, Double-Blind, Cross-Sectional Study.

机构信息

Royal North Shore Hospital, University of Sydney, and Prince of Wales Hospital, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia.

Royal North Shore Hospital, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia.

出版信息

Arthritis Rheumatol. 2019 Aug;71(8):1319-1328. doi: 10.1002/art.40864. Epub 2019 Jun 12.

Abstract

OBJECTIVE

Positron emission tomography/computed tomography (PET/CT) has not been well studied as a first-line test for giant cell arteritis (GCA), due, in part, to historical limitations in visualizing the cranial arteries. The Giant Cell Arteritis and PET Scan (GAPS) study was therefore carried out to assess the accuracy of a newer generation PET/CT of the head, neck, and chest for determining a diagnosis of GCA.

METHODS

In the GAPS study cohort, 64 patients with newly suspected GCA underwent time-of-flight PET/CT (1-mm slice thickness from the vertex to diaphragm) within 72 hours of starting glucocorticoids and before undergoing temporal artery biopsy (TAB). Two physicians with experience in PET reviewed the patients' scans in a blinded manner and reported the scans as globally positive or negative for GCA. Tracer uptake was graded across 18 artery segments. The clinical diagnosis was confirmed at 6 months' follow-up.

RESULTS

In total, 58 of 64 patients underwent TAB, and 12 (21%) of the biopsies were considered positive for GCA. Twenty-one patients had a clinical diagnosis of GCA. Compared to TAB, the sensitivity of PET/CT for a diagnosis of GCA was 92% (95% confidence interval [95% CI] 62-100%) and specificity was 85% (95% CI 71-94%). The negative predictive value (NPV) was 98% (95% CI 87-100%). Compared to clinical diagnosis, PET/CT had a sensitivity of 71% (95% CI 48-89%) and specificity of 91% (95% CI 78-97%). Interobserver reliability was moderate (κ = 0.65). Among the enrolled patients, 20% had a clinically relevant incidental finding, including 7 with an infection and 5 with a malignancy. Furthermore, 5 (42%) of 12 TAB-positive GCA patients had moderate or marked aortitis.

CONCLUSION

The high diagnostic accuracy of this PET/CT protocol would support its use as a first-line test for GCA. The NPV of 98% indicates the particular utility of this test in ruling out the condition in patients considered to be at lower risk of GCA. PET/CT had benefit over TAB in detecting vasculitis mimics and aortitis.

摘要

目的

由于历史上在可视化颅动脉方面存在局限性,正电子发射断层扫描/计算机断层扫描(PET/CT)在巨细胞动脉炎(GCA)的一线检查中并未得到充分研究。因此,开展了巨细胞动脉炎和 PET 扫描(GAPS)研究,以评估新一代头部、颈部和胸部 PET/CT 确定 GCA 诊断的准确性。

方法

在 GAPS 研究队列中,64 例新疑诊 GCA 的患者在开始糖皮质激素治疗后 72 小时内和进行颞动脉活检(TAB)之前进行了飞行时间 PET/CT(从头顶到膈肌的 1 毫米层厚)。两名具有 PET 经验的医生以盲法方式对患者的扫描进行了评估,并报告扫描结果为 GCA 阳性或阴性。在 18 个动脉段上对示踪剂摄取进行分级。在 6 个月的随访时确认临床诊断。

结果

共有 64 例患者中的 58 例接受了 TAB,12 例(21%)活检结果为 GCA 阳性。21 例患者有 GCA 的临床诊断。与 TAB 相比,PET/CT 对 GCA 的诊断灵敏度为 92%(95%置信区间[95%CI]62-100%),特异性为 85%(95%CI 71-94%)。阴性预测值(NPV)为 98%(95%CI 87-100%)。与临床诊断相比,PET/CT 的灵敏度为 71%(95%CI 48-89%),特异性为 91%(95%CI 78-97%)。观察者间可靠性为中度(κ=0.65)。在入组的患者中,20%有临床相关的偶发发现,包括 7 例感染和 5 例恶性肿瘤。此外,12 例 TAB 阳性 GCA 患者中有 5 例(42%)存在中度或明显的大动脉炎。

结论

该 PET/CT 方案的高诊断准确性支持其作为 GCA 的一线检查方法。98%的 NPV 表明,该检查在考虑低 GCA 风险的患者中特别有助于排除该疾病。PET/CT 在检测血管炎模拟物和大动脉炎方面优于 TAB。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验