• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

固定式电池系统存储电力的额外排放和成本。

Additional Emissions and Cost from Storing Electricity in Stationary Battery Systems.

机构信息

Energy Politics Group , ETH Zurich , Haldeneggsteig 4 , 8092 Zurich , Switzerland.

Laboratory for Energy Systems Analysis , Paul Scherrer Institute , 5232 Villigen , PSI , Switzerland.

出版信息

Environ Sci Technol. 2019 Apr 2;53(7):3379-3390. doi: 10.1021/acs.est.8b05313. Epub 2019 Mar 20.

DOI:10.1021/acs.est.8b05313
PMID:30848899
Abstract

Stationary batteries are an important technological option for renewable energy-based decarbonization of the electricity sector, as they can counterbalance renewable energy sources' intermittency and provide grid-stabilizing services. However, it has been argued that the additional economic cost of batteries, emissions occurring during the manufacturing phase of batteries, and emissions caused by losses during the use phase can reduce batteries' potential in supporting the decarbonization of the electricity sector. Here, we perform a new battery production- and use-phase lifecycle emissions and cost analysis to calculate the additional lifecycle greenhoues gas (GHG) emissions (LCE) and costs (LCC) that arise from storing electricity in six different battery technologies, five applications, and three different geographies. Our results show that the LCE of storing electricity are strongly determined by application and geography, whereas LCC vary with application and technology. Lithium-ion technologies perform best across most applications and geographies on both the LCE and LCC dimensions. Furthermore, we only identify trade-offs between the LCC and the GHG emissions cost when assuming a high social cost of GHG emissions of 180 EUR/tonCOe. Based on our results, we discuss which dimensions of technological improvement of battery technologies are most desirable from a societal perspective.

摘要

固定式电池是可再生能源电力部门脱碳的重要技术选择,因为它们可以平衡可再生能源的间歇性,并提供电网稳定服务。然而,有人认为,电池的额外经济成本、电池制造阶段的排放以及使用阶段损失造成的排放,可能会降低电池在支持电力部门脱碳方面的潜力。在这里,我们进行了新的电池生产和使用阶段生命周期排放和成本分析,以计算在六种不同电池技术、五种应用和三个不同地理位置中储存电力所产生的额外生命周期温室气体 (GHG) 排放 (LCE) 和成本 (LCC)。我们的结果表明,储存电力的 LCE 主要取决于应用和地理位置,而 LCC 则随应用和技术而变化。在 LCE 和 LCC 方面,锂离子技术在大多数应用和地理位置上的表现都优于其他技术。此外,只有当假设 GHG 排放的社会成本为 180 欧元/吨 COe 时,我们才会在 LCC 和 GHG 排放成本之间发现权衡。基于我们的结果,我们讨论了从社会角度来看,电池技术在哪些方面的技术改进是最可取的。

相似文献

1
Additional Emissions and Cost from Storing Electricity in Stationary Battery Systems.固定式电池系统存储电力的额外排放和成本。
Environ Sci Technol. 2019 Apr 2;53(7):3379-3390. doi: 10.1021/acs.est.8b05313. Epub 2019 Mar 20.
2
Estimating the environmental impacts of global lithium-ion battery supply chain: A temporal, geographical, and technological perspective.从时间、地理和技术角度评估全球锂离子电池供应链的环境影响
PNAS Nexus. 2023 Nov 28;2(11):pgad361. doi: 10.1093/pnasnexus/pgad361. eCollection 2023 Nov.
3
Life cycle assessment of greenhouse gas emissions from plug-in hybrid vehicles: implications for policy.插电式混合动力汽车温室气体排放的生命周期评估:对政策的影响
Environ Sci Technol. 2008 May 1;42(9):3170-6. doi: 10.1021/es702178s.
4
Second life batteries lifespan: Rest of useful life and environmental analysis.二次电池寿命:剩余有用寿命和环境分析。
J Environ Manage. 2019 Feb 15;232:354-363. doi: 10.1016/j.jenvman.2018.11.046. Epub 2018 Nov 27.
5
Cradle-to-Gate Emissions from a Commercial Electric Vehicle Li-Ion Battery: A Comparative Analysis.从摇篮到大门:商业电动汽车锂离子电池的排放:比较分析。
Environ Sci Technol. 2016 Jul 19;50(14):7715-22. doi: 10.1021/acs.est.6b00830. Epub 2016 Jun 28.
6
Environmental and economic evaluation of remanufacturing lithium-ion batteries from electric vehicles.从电动汽车中回收再制造锂离子电池的环境和经济评估。
Waste Manag. 2020 Feb 1;102:579-586. doi: 10.1016/j.wasman.2019.11.013. Epub 2019 Nov 23.
7
Electricity generation: options for reduction in carbon emissions.发电:减少碳排放的选项
Philos Trans A Math Phys Eng Sci. 2002 Aug 15;360(1797):1653-68. doi: 10.1098/rsta.2002.1025.
8
Private and External Costs and Benefits of Replacing High-Emitting Peaker Plants with Batteries.用电池替代高排放调峰电厂的私人和外部成本及收益。
Environ Sci Technol. 2023 Mar 28;57(12):4992-5002. doi: 10.1021/acs.est.2c09319. Epub 2023 Mar 14.
9
On the influence of second use, future battery technologies, and battery lifetime on the maximum recycled content of future electric vehicle batteries in Europe.论二次利用、未来电池技术和电池寿命对未来欧洲电动汽车电池最大回收含量的影响。
Waste Manag. 2021 Apr 15;125:1-9. doi: 10.1016/j.wasman.2021.02.032. Epub 2021 Mar 2.
10
Evaluating the cost and carbon footprint of second-life electric vehicle batteries in residential and utility-level applications.评估二次生命电动汽车电池在住宅和公共设施应用中的成本和碳足迹。
Waste Manag. 2020 Jul 15;113:497-507. doi: 10.1016/j.wasman.2020.05.034. Epub 2020 Jun 6.

引用本文的文献

1
Improving process granularity of life cycle inventories for battery grade nickel.提高电池级镍生命周期清单的过程粒度。
Npj Mater Sustain. 2025;3(1):15. doi: 10.1038/s44296-025-00059-7. Epub 2025 Jun 3.
2
Prospective environmental burdens and benefits of fast-swing direct air carbon capture and storage.快速摆动式直接空气碳捕集与封存的预期环境负担和效益
Sci Rep. 2024 Jul 17;14(1):16549. doi: 10.1038/s41598-024-66990-2.
3
Heterogeneous effects of battery storage deployment strategies on decarbonization of provincial power systems in China.
电池储能部署策略对中国省级电力系统脱碳的异质效应。
Nat Commun. 2023 Aug 11;14(1):4858. doi: 10.1038/s41467-023-40337-3.
4
Second life and recycling: Energy and environmental sustainability perspectives for high-performance lithium-ion batteries.二次生命与回收利用:高性能锂离子电池的能源与环境可持续性视角
Sci Adv. 2021 Nov 5;7(45):eabi7633. doi: 10.1126/sciadv.abi7633.
5
An insight into the electro-chemical properties of halogen (F, Cl and Br) doped BP and BN nanocages as anodes in metal-ion batteries.对卤素(F、Cl和Br)掺杂的BP和BN纳米笼作为金属离子电池阳极的电化学性质的洞察。
Sci Rep. 2020 Nov 17;10(1):19948. doi: 10.1038/s41598-020-76749-0.