• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

相似文献

1
You Don't Know What You Don't Know: Using Nominal Group Technique to Identify and Prioritize Education Topics for Regional Hospitals.你不知道自己不知道什么:运用名义群体技术确定地区医院教育主题并排出优先顺序
Hosp Pediatr. 2019 Apr;9(4):300-304. doi: 10.1542/hpeds.2018-0217. Epub 2019 Mar 8.
2
Prioritizing comparative effectiveness research for cancer diagnostics using a regional stakeholder approach.采用区域利益相关者方法优先开展癌症诊断的比较效果研究。
J Comp Eff Res. 2012 May;1(3):241-55. doi: 10.2217/cer.12.16.
3
Nominal group technique: a brainstorming tool for identifying areas to improve pain management in hospitalized patients.名义群体技术:一种用于确定改善住院患者疼痛管理的领域的头脑风暴工具。
J Hosp Med. 2012 May-Jun;7(5):416-20. doi: 10.1002/jhm.1900. Epub 2011 Dec 21.
4
Use of the nominal group technique to identify stakeholder priorities and inform survey development: an example with informal caregivers of people with scleroderma.运用名词组技术确定利益相关者的优先事项并为调查问卷的编制提供信息:以硬皮病患者的非正式照护者为例
BMJ Open. 2018 Mar 2;8(3):e019726. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2017-019726.
5
Co-designing person-centred quality indicator implementation for primary care in Alberta: a consensus study.共同设计艾伯塔省初级保健中以患者为中心的质量指标实施方案:一项共识研究。
Res Involv Engagem. 2022 Nov 8;8(1):59. doi: 10.1186/s40900-022-00397-z.
6
Module evaluation: a comparison of standard evaluation with nominal group technique.模块评估:标准评估与名义群体技术的比较
Educ Prim Care. 2013 Feb;24(2):111-8. doi: 10.1080/14739879.2013.11493465.
7
Consensus on priorities in maternal education: results of Delphi and nominal group technique approaches.产妇教育重点的共识:德尔菲法和名义群体技术方法的结果。
BMC Pregnancy Childbirth. 2019 Jul 24;19(1):264. doi: 10.1186/s12884-019-2382-8.
8
Identifying priority challenges of older adults with COPD: A multiphase intervention refinement study.确定 COPD 老年患者的优先挑战:一项多阶段干预措施优化研究。
J Am Geriatr Soc. 2024 Nov;72(11):3346-3359. doi: 10.1111/jgs.19158. Epub 2024 Aug 31.
9
Defining the Content for a Quality and Safety in Surgery Curriculum Using a Nominal Group Technique.使用名义群体技术为外科手术质量和安全课程定义内容。
J Surg Educ. 2019 May-Jun;76(3):795-801. doi: 10.1016/j.jsurg.2018.10.005. Epub 2018 Nov 19.
10
Achieving Consensus Among Stakeholders Using the Nominal Group Technique: A Perinatal Quality Collaborative Approach.使用名义群体技术在利益相关者中达成共识:围产期质量协作方法。
Qual Manag Health Care. 2023;32(3):161-169. doi: 10.1097/QMH.0000000000000384. Epub 2022 Aug 24.

引用本文的文献

1
Core Palliative Care Competencies for Undergraduate Nursing Education: International Multisite Research Using Online Nominal Group Technique.本科护理教育的核心姑息治疗能力:使用在线名义群体技术的国际多站点研究。
J Palliat Care. 2024 Jul;39(3):217-226. doi: 10.1177/08258597241244605. Epub 2024 Apr 7.
2
Development and validation of educational multimedia to promote public health literacy about healthy cognitive aging.开发和验证教育多媒体,以提高公众对健康认知老化的健康素养。
Health Expect. 2023 Dec;26(6):2571-2583. doi: 10.1111/hex.13857. Epub 2023 Aug 27.

本文引用的文献

1
Establishing the Key Outcomes for Pediatric Emergency Medical Services Research.确立儿科急诊医疗服务研究的关键结果。
Acad Emerg Med. 2018 Dec;25(12):1345-1354. doi: 10.1111/acem.13637. Epub 2018 Nov 8.
2
Reaching a consensus on research priorities for supporting women with autoimmune rheumatic diseases during pre-conception, pregnancy and early parenting: A Nominal Group Technique exercise with lay and professional stakeholders.就孕前、孕期及育儿早期支持自身免疫性风湿病女性的研究重点达成共识:一项针对普通及专业利益相关者的名义小组技术活动
Wellcome Open Res. 2018 Jun 20;3:75. doi: 10.12688/wellcomeopenres.14658.1. eCollection 2018.
3
Development of a Collaborative Algorithm for the Management of Type 2 Diabetes during Ramadan: An Anchor on Empowerment.开发 2 型糖尿病在斋月期间管理的协作算法:赋权的基石。
Diabetes Technol Ther. 2018 Oct;20(10):698-703. doi: 10.1089/dia.2018.0159. Epub 2018 Sep 6.
4
Enhancing Pediatric Asthma Care and Nursing Education Through an Academic Practice Partnership.通过学术实践伙伴关系加强儿科哮喘护理与护理教育
J Pediatr Nurs. 2017 Sep-Oct;36:64-69. doi: 10.1016/j.pedn.2017.04.008. Epub 2017 May 23.
5
Developing a Framework for Objective Structured Clinical Examinations Using the Nominal Group Technique.使用名义群体技术开发客观结构化临床考试框架。
Am J Pharm Educ. 2016 Nov 25;80(9):158. doi: 10.5688/ajpe809158.
6
Using a Distance-Based Partnership to Start a Hospital Medicine Program and a Quality Improvement Education Program.利用基于距离的合作关系启动医院医学项目和质量改进教育项目。
Hosp Pediatr. 2016 Oct;6(10):638-641. doi: 10.1542/hpeds.2015-0212. Epub 2016 Sep 1.
7
Impact of Telemedicine on Severity of Illness and Outcomes Among Children Transferred From Referring Emergency Departments to a Children's Hospital PICU.远程医疗对从转诊急诊科转入儿童医院重症监护病房的儿童疾病严重程度和治疗结果的影响。
Pediatr Crit Care Med. 2016 Jun;17(6):516-21. doi: 10.1097/PCC.0000000000000761.
8
How to use the nominal group and Delphi techniques.如何使用名词组和德尔菲技术。
Int J Clin Pharm. 2016 Jun;38(3):655-62. doi: 10.1007/s11096-016-0257-x. Epub 2016 Feb 5.
9
Patient and Stakeholder Engagement in the PCORI Pilot Projects: Description and Lessons Learned.患者及利益相关者参与患者为中心的结果研究所试点项目:描述与经验教训
J Gen Intern Med. 2016 Jan;31(1):13-21. doi: 10.1007/s11606-015-3450-z. Epub 2015 Jul 10.
10
Academic-community partnerships improve outcomes in pediatric trauma care.
J Pediatr Surg. 2015 Jun;50(6):1032-6. doi: 10.1016/j.jpedsurg.2015.03.033. Epub 2015 Mar 14.

你不知道自己不知道什么:运用名义群体技术确定地区医院教育主题并排出优先顺序

You Don't Know What You Don't Know: Using Nominal Group Technique to Identify and Prioritize Education Topics for Regional Hospitals.

作者信息

Sauers-Ford Hadley S, Hamline Michelle Y, Tzimenatos Leah, McKnight Heather, Hamilton Charlaine M, McKennan Maureen G, Rosenthal Jennifer L

机构信息

Departments of Pediatrics and

Departments of Pediatrics and.

出版信息

Hosp Pediatr. 2019 Apr;9(4):300-304. doi: 10.1542/hpeds.2018-0217. Epub 2019 Mar 8.

DOI:10.1542/hpeds.2018-0217
PMID:30850375
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC6434971/
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Our 121-bed children's hospital is a quaternary care referral center for a 33-county region. Referring hospitals asked for Pediatric Acute Care Education Sessions (PACES). To determine which topics to prioritize for these sessions, nominal group technique (NGT) methods were used to obtain stakeholder-prioritized consensus on education topics.

METHODS

Five NGT sessions were conducted over 6 weeks at referring hospitals throughout central and northern California. Each session lasted ∼90 minutes and engaged a diverse multidisciplinary group of stakeholders. At these sessions, stakeholders answered the question "What are your top 5 clinical topics that should be prioritized by PACES?" NGT numeric ranking methods were used to determine prioritized topics. A thematic analysis was performed on the session transcripts.

RESULTS

The 5 sessions had 43 total participants, including nurses, respiratory therapists, physicians, and administrators. The top 4 prioritized topics were sepsis, diabetic ketoacidosis, respiratory failure or support, and bronchiolitis and/or respiratory syncytial virus. Unique education needs for each hospital were also uncovered in the NGT discussion. Three qualitative themes emerged from the discussion: diverse educational needs, the need for guidelines on telemedicine and transfer, and relationship building.

CONCLUSIONS

The use of NGT to engage multisite, multidisciplinary stakeholders helped to inform an education program. The use of NGT methods provided rich information that would not have been obtained through surveys alone and helped facilitate relationship building. The PACES group was able to identify and prioritize education topics of interest to referring community hospitals.

摘要

背景

我们拥有121张床位的儿童医院是一个为33个县的地区提供四级医疗转诊服务的中心。转诊医院要求举办儿科急性护理教育课程(PACES)。为了确定这些课程应优先安排哪些主题,采用了名义小组技术(NGT)方法来就教育主题达成利益相关者优先排序的共识。

方法

在加利福尼亚州中部和北部的转诊医院,于6周内举办了5次NGT会议。每次会议持续约90分钟,参与人员包括来自不同学科的利益相关者。在这些会议上,利益相关者回答了“PACES应优先安排的前5个临床主题是什么?”这一问题。使用NGT数字排序方法来确定优先主题。对会议记录进行了主题分析。

结果

5次会议共有43名参与者,包括护士、呼吸治疗师、医生和管理人员。排名前4的优先主题是败血症、糖尿病酮症酸中毒、呼吸衰竭或支持,以及细支气管炎和/或呼吸道合胞病毒。在NGT讨论中还发现了每家医院独特的教育需求。讨论中出现了三个定性主题:多样化的教育需求、对远程医疗和转诊指南的需求,以及关系建立。

结论

使用NGT让多地点、多学科的利益相关者参与其中,有助于为一个教育项目提供信息。NGT方法的使用提供了丰富的信息,这些信息仅凭调查是无法获得的,并且有助于促进关系建立。PACES小组能够确定转诊社区医院感兴趣的教育主题并进行优先排序。