Exeter Knee Reconstruction Unit, Princess Elizabeth Orthopaedic Centre, Royal Devon and Exeter Hospital, Barrack Road, Exeter, UK.
Southmead Hospital, Southmead Road, Westbury-on-Trym, Bristol, UK.
Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc. 2019 Apr;27(4):1011-1017. doi: 10.1007/s00167-019-05462-x. Epub 2019 Mar 8.
There is considerable variation in practice throughout Europe in both the services provided and in the outcomes of Revision Knee Surgery. In the UK, a recent report published called get it right first time (GIRFT) aims to improve patient outcomes through providing high quality, cost-effective care, and reducing complications. This has led to the development of a classification system that attempts to classify the complexity of revision knee surgery, aiming to encourage and support regional clinical networking.
The revision knee classification system (RKCC) incorporates not only complexity, but also patient factors, the presence of infection, the integrity of the extensor mechanism, and the soft tissues. It then provides guidance for clinical network discussion. Reliability and reproducibility testing have been performed to establish the inter- and intra-observer variabilities using this classification.
Good correlation between first attempt non-expert and experts, good intra-observer variability of non-expert, and an excellent correlation between second attempt non-expert and experts has been achieved. This supports the use of RKCC by both inexperienced and experienced surgeons.
The revision knee complexity classification has been proposed that offers a common-sense approach to recognize the increasing complexity in revision TKR cases. It provides a methodological assessment of revision knee cases and support regional clinical networking and triage of appropriate cases to revision units or specialist centres.
Expert opinion, Level V.
在欧洲,膝关节翻修手术的服务内容和手术结果在实践中存在很大差异。在英国,最近发布的一份名为“首次正确处理(GIRFT)”的报告旨在通过提供高质量、具有成本效益的护理和减少并发症来改善患者的治疗效果。这导致了分类系统的发展,该系统试图对膝关节翻修手术的复杂性进行分类,旨在鼓励和支持区域临床网络。
膝关节翻修分类系统(RKCC)不仅包含了复杂性,还包含了患者因素、感染的存在、伸肌机制的完整性和软组织的情况。然后,它为临床网络讨论提供了指导。已经进行了可靠性和可重复性测试,以使用该分类来确定观察者间和观察者内的变异性。
首次尝试的非专家和专家之间有很好的相关性,非专家的观察者内变异性良好,第二次尝试的非专家和专家之间有极好的相关性。这支持了经验丰富和经验不足的外科医生使用 RKCC。
提出了膝关节翻修复杂性分类,为认识膝关节翻修 TKR 病例的日益复杂性提供了一种常识性方法。它对膝关节翻修病例进行了方法学评估,并支持区域临床网络,对适当的病例进行分诊,以便转至翻修单位或专科中心。
专家意见,等级 V。