Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas.
Health Services Research, University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas.
Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 2019 Jul 1;104(3):574-581. doi: 10.1016/j.ijrobp.2019.02.049. Epub 2019 Mar 6.
Optimal treatment of patients diagnosed with de novo metastatic breast cancer limited to the mediastinum or sternum has never been delineated. Herein, we sought to determine the efficacy of multimodality treatment, including metastasis-directed radiation therapy, in curing patients with this presentation.
This is a single-institution retrospective cohort study of patients with de novo metastatic breast cancer treated from 2005 to 2014, with a 50-month median follow-up for the primary cohort. The primary patient cohort had metastasis limited to the mediastinum/sternum treated with curative intent (n = 35). We also included a cohort of patients with stage IIIC disease treated with curative intent (n = 244). Additional groups included a mediastinal/sternal palliative cohort (treatment did not include metastasis-directed radiation therapy; n = 14) and all other patients with de novo stage IV disease (palliative cohort; n = 1185). The primary study outcomes included locoregional recurrence-free survival (LRRFS), recurrence-free survival (RFS), and overall survival (OS), which were calculated using the Kaplan-Meier method. Cox multivariable models compared survival outcomes across treatment cohorts adjusted for molecular subtype, age, and race.
For the mediastinal/sternal curative-intent cohort, 5-year LRRFS was 85%, RFS was 52%, and OS was 63%. After adjustment, there was no statistically significant difference in LRRFS (hazard ratio [HR], 0.39; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.13-1.13; P = .08), RFS (HR, 0.87; 95% CI 0.50-1.49; P = .61), or OS (HR, 0.79; 95% CI 0.44-1.43; P = .44) between the stage IIIC cohort and the mediastinal/sternal curative-intent cohort (referent). In contrast, RFS was worse for the mediastinal/sternal palliative cohort (HR, 2.29; 95% CI 1.05-5.00; P = .04). OS was worst for the de novo stage IV palliative cohort (HR, 2.61; 95% CI 1.50-4.53; P < .001).
For select patients presenting with breast cancer metastatic to the sternum and/or mediastinum, curative-intent treatment with chemotherapy, surgery, and radiation yields outcomes similar to those of stage IIIC disease and superior to de novo stage IV breast cancer treated with palliative intent.
对于仅局限于纵隔或胸骨的新发转移性乳腺癌患者,最佳治疗方案尚未明确。在此,我们旨在确定包括转移灶定向放疗在内的多模式治疗对该类患者的疗效。
这是一项单中心回顾性队列研究,纳入了 2005 年至 2014 年间接受治疗的新发转移性乳腺癌患者,对主要队列的中位随访时间为 50 个月。主要的患者队列(n=35)为接受以治愈为目的治疗的纵隔/胸骨转移局限性乳腺癌。我们还纳入了一组接受以治愈为目的治疗的 IIIC 期疾病患者(n=244)。其他组包括纵隔/胸骨姑息性队列(治疗不包括转移灶定向放疗;n=14)和所有其他新发 IV 期疾病患者(姑息性队列;n=1185)。主要研究结局包括局部区域无复发生存(LRRFS)、无复发生存(RFS)和总生存(OS),采用 Kaplan-Meier 法计算。Cox 多变量模型比较了调整分子亚型、年龄和种族后各治疗队列的生存结局。
对于纵隔/胸骨以治愈为目的的队列,5 年 LRRFS 为 85%,RFS 为 52%,OS 为 63%。调整后,LRRFS(危险比 [HR],0.39;95%置信区间 [CI],0.13-1.13;P=0.08)、RFS(HR,0.87;95%CI 0.50-1.49;P=0.61)和 OS(HR,0.79;95%CI 0.44-1.43;P=0.44)方面,IIIC 期队列与纵隔/胸骨以治愈为目的的队列之间无统计学显著差异(参考)。相比之下,纵隔/胸骨姑息性队列的 RFS 更差(HR,2.29;95%CI 1.05-5.00;P=0.04)。OS 最差的是新发 IV 期姑息性队列(HR,2.61;95%CI 1.50-4.53;P<.001)。
对于存在乳腺癌转移至胸骨和/或纵隔的特定患者,以化疗、手术和放疗为基础的以治愈为目的治疗可获得与 IIIC 期疾病相似的结果,并优于以姑息为目的治疗的新发 IV 期乳腺癌。