Department of Cardiology, Oslo University Hospital Rikshospitalet, Oslo, Norway.
KG Jebsen Center for Cardiac Research, University of Oslo, and Center for Heart Failure Research, Oslo University Hospital, Oslo, Norway.
Cardiovasc Diabetol. 2019 Mar 9;18(1):26. doi: 10.1186/s12933-019-0832-2.
The prevalence of asymptomatic coronary artery disease (CAD) in type 2 diabetes (T2D) is unclear. We investigated the extent and prevalence of asymptomatic CAD in T2D patients by utilizing invasive coronary angiography (ICA) and intravascular ultrasound (IVUS), and whether CAD progression, evaluated by ICA, could be modulated with a multi-intervention to reduce cardiovascular (CV) risk.
Fifty-six T2D patients with ≥ 1 additional CV risk factor participated in a 2 year randomized controlled study comparing hospital-based multi-intervention (multi, n = 30) versus standard care (stand, n = 26), with a pre-planned follow-up at year seven. They underwent ICA at baseline and both ICA and IVUS at year seven. ICA was described by conventional CAD severity and extent scores. IVUS was described by maximal intimal thickness (MIT), percent and total atheroma volume and compared with individuals without T2D and CAD (heart transplant donors who had IVUS performed 7-11 weeks post-transplant, n = 147).
Despite CV risk reduction in multi after 2 years intervention, there was no between-group difference in the progression of CAD at year seven. Overall, the prevalence of CAD defined by MIT ≥ 0.5 mm in the T2DM subjects was 84%, and as compared to the non-T2DM controls there was a significantly higher atheroma burden (mean MIT, PAV and TAV in the T2D population were 0.75 ± 0.27 mm, 33.8 ± 9.8% and 277.0 ± 137.3 mm as compared to 0.41 ± 0.19 mm, 17.8 ± 7.3% and 134.9 ± 100.6 mm in the reference population).
We demonstrated that a 2 year multi-intervention, despite improvement in CV risk factors, did not influence angiographic progression of CAD. Further, IVUS revealed that the prevalence of asymptomatic CAD in T2D patients is high, suggesting a need for a broader residual CV risk management using alternative approaches. Trial registration Clinical trials.gov id: NCT00133718 ( https://clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/NCT00133718 ).
2 型糖尿病(T2D)患者无症状性冠状动脉疾病(CAD)的患病率尚不清楚。我们通过经皮冠状动脉造影(ICA)和血管内超声(IVUS)评估 T2D 患者无症状性 CAD 的程度和患病率,以及通过 ICA 评估的 CAD 进展是否可以通过多干预来调节以降低心血管(CV)风险。
56 例 T2D 患者,伴有≥1 个以上 CV 危险因素,参与了一项为期 2 年的随机对照研究,比较了基于医院的多干预(多组,n=30)与标准护理(对照组,n=26),并计划在第七年进行随访。他们在基线时进行 ICA,在第七年时进行 ICA 和 IVUS。ICA 采用传统的 CAD 严重程度和程度评分进行描述。IVUS 采用最大内膜厚度(MIT)、百分比和总动脉粥样斑块体积进行描述,并与无 T2D 和 CAD 的个体(心脏移植受者,他们在移植后 7-11 周进行 IVUS 检查,n=147)进行比较。
尽管多组在 2 年后的干预中降低了 CV 风险,但在第七年时 CAD 进展方面两组之间没有差异。总体而言,在 T2DM 患者中,MIT≥0.5mm 定义的 CAD 患病率为 84%,与非 T2DM 对照组相比,动脉粥样斑块负担明显更高(T2D 人群的平均 MIT、PAV 和 TAV 分别为 0.75±0.27mm、33.8±9.8%和 277.0±137.3mm,而参考人群分别为 0.41±0.19mm、17.8±7.3%和 134.9±100.6mm)。
我们表明,尽管 CV 危险因素有所改善,但 2 年多干预并未影响 CAD 的血管造影进展。此外,IVUS 显示 T2D 患者无症状性 CAD 的患病率较高,这表明需要使用替代方法更广泛地管理残余 CV 风险。试验注册:ClinicalTrials.gov 标识符:NCT00133718(https://clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/NCT00133718)。