Multidisciplinary Cardiovascular Research Centre & Division of Biomedical Imaging, Leeds Institute of Cardiovascular and Metabolic Medicine, LIGHT Laboratories, Clarendon Way, University of Leeds, Leeds, LS2 9JT, UK.
Leeds Teaching Hospitals NHS Trust, Great George Street, Leeds, UK.
Cardiovasc Diabetol. 2018 Mar 5;17(1):35. doi: 10.1186/s12933-018-0681-4.
We aimed to investigate in patients with type 2 diabetes whether aortic stiffness is: (i) associated with glycaemic control, (ii) associated with adverse outcomes and (iii) can be reversed on treatment with RAAS inhibition.
Patients with type 2 diabetes (N = 94) and low vascular risk underwent assessment of cardiovascular risk and CMR assessment of ascending aortic distensibility (AAD), descending aortic distensibility (DAD) and aortic pulse wave velocity (PWV). Of these patients a subgroup with recent onset microalbuminuria (N = 25) were treated with renin-angiotensin-aldosterone system (RAAS) inhibition and imaging repeated after 1 year. All 94 patients were followed up for 2.4 years for major adverse cardiovascular disease (CVD) events including myocardial infarction detected on late gadolinium enhancement CMR.
Ascending aortic distensibility, DAD and PWV all had a significant association with age and 24 h systolic blood pressure but only AAD had a significant association with glycaemic control, measured as HbA1c (Beta - 0.016, P = 0.04). The association between HbA1c and AAD persisted even after correction for age and hypertension. CVD events occurred in 19/94 patients. AAD, but not DAD or PWV, was associated with CVD events (hazard ratio 0.49, 95% confidence interval 0.25-0.95, P = 0.01). On treatment with RAAS inhibition, AAD, but not DAD or PWV, showed significant improvement from 1.51 ± 1.15 to 1.97 ± 1.07 10 mmHg, P = 0.007.
Ascending aortic distensibility measured by CMR is independently associated with poor glycaemic control and adverse cardiovascular events. Furthermore it may be reversible on treatment with RAAS inhibition. AAD is a promising marker of cardiovascular risk in asymptomatic patients with type 2 diabetes and has potential use as a surrogate cardiovascular endpoint in studies of novel hypoglycaemic agents. Clinical trials registration https://clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/NCT01970319.
我们旨在研究 2 型糖尿病患者的主动脉僵硬程度:(i) 与血糖控制相关,(ii) 与不良结局相关,(iii) 是否可通过肾素-血管紧张素-醛固酮系统(RAAS)抑制逆转。
94 例 2 型糖尿病患者(低血管风险)接受心血管风险评估和心脏磁共振评估升主动脉扩张性(AAD)、降主动脉扩张性(DAD)和主动脉脉搏波速度(PWV)。其中,25 例近期出现微量白蛋白尿的亚组患者接受 RAAS 抑制治疗,1 年后重复影像学检查。94 例患者均随访 2.4 年,以检测迟发钆增强心脏磁共振上的主要不良心血管疾病(CVD)事件,包括心肌梗死。
升主动脉扩张性、降主动脉扩张性和脉搏波速度均与年龄和 24 小时收缩压显著相关,但只有 AAD 与血糖控制(HbA1c)显著相关(β-0.016,P=0.04)。即使在校正年龄和高血压后,HbA1c 与 AAD 之间的相关性仍然存在。94 例患者中有 19 例发生 CVD 事件。AAD 而不是 DAD 或 PWV 与 CVD 事件相关(危险比 0.49,95%置信区间 0.25-0.95,P=0.01)。RAAS 抑制治疗后,AAD 而非 DAD 或 PWV 显著改善,从 1.51±1.15 增加至 1.97±1.07mmHg,P=0.007。
心脏磁共振测量的升主动脉扩张性与血糖控制不良和不良心血管事件独立相关。此外,它可能通过 RAAS 抑制治疗逆转。AAD 是 2 型糖尿病无症状患者心血管风险的一个有前途的标志物,作为新型降血糖药物研究中的替代心血管终点具有潜在用途。临床试验注册信息 https://clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/NCT01970319。