Department of Animal Science, University of California, Davis 95616.
USDA, Agricultural Research Service, Animal Genomics and Improvement Laboratory, Beltsville, MD 20705-2350.
J Dairy Sci. 2019 May;102(5):4215-4226. doi: 10.3168/jds.2018-15892. Epub 2019 Mar 7.
Disbudding and dehorning are commonly used cattle management practices to protect animals and humans from injury. They are unpleasant, costly processes subject to increased public scrutiny as an animal welfare issue. Horns are a recessively inherited trait, so one option to eliminate dehorning is to breed for polled (hornlessness). However, due to the low genetic merit and scarcity of polled dairy sires, this approach has not been widely adopted. In March 2018, only 3 Holstein and 0 Jersey active homozygous polled sires were registered with the National Association of Animal Breeders. Alternatively, gene editing to produce high-genetic-merit polled sires has been proposed. To further explore this concept, introgression of the POLLED allele into both the US Holstein and Jersey cattle populations via conventional breeding or gene editing (top 1% of bulls/year) was simulated for 3 polled mating schemes and compared with baseline selection on lifetime net merit (NM$) alone, over the course of 20 yr. Scenarios were replicated 10 times and the changes in HORNED allele frequency, inbreeding, genetic gain (NM$), and number of unique sires used were calculated. Gene editing decreased the frequency of the HORNED allele to <0.1 after 20 yr, which was as fast or faster than conventional breeding for both breeds. In the mating scheme that required the use of only existing homozygous polled sires, inbreeding reached 17% (Holstein) and 14% (Jersey), compared with less than 7% in the baseline scenarios. However, gene editing in the same mating scheme resulted in significantly less inbreeding, 9% (Holstein) and 8% (Jersey). Also, gene editing resulted in significantly higher NM$ after 20 yr compared with conventional breeding for both breeds. Additionally, the gene editing scenarios of both breeds used a significantly greater number of unique sires compared with either the conventional breeding or baseline scenarios. Overall, our simulations show that, given the current genetic merit of horned and polled dairy sires, the use of conventional breeding methods to decrease the frequency of the HORNED allele will increase inbreeding and slow genetic improvement. Furthermore, this study demonstrates how gene editing could be used to rapidly decrease the frequency of the HORNED allele in US dairy cattle populations while maintaining the rate of genetic gain, constraining inbreeding to acceptable levels, and simultaneously addressing an emerging animal welfare concern.
去角和去势是常见的牛只管理措施,旨在保护动物和人类免受伤害。这些操作令人不快且成本高昂,作为动物福利问题受到越来越多的公众关注。角是一种隐性遗传特征,因此消除去角的一种选择是培育无角品种(polled,无角)。然而,由于低遗传优势和无角奶牛种公牛的稀缺,这种方法并未得到广泛采用。截至 2018 年 3 月,全国动物饲养者协会仅注册了 3 头荷斯坦和 0 头泽西种公牛为纯合隐性无角。或者,通过基因编辑生产具有高遗传优势的无角种公牛也已被提出。为了进一步探索这一概念,通过常规繁殖或基因编辑(每年前 1%的公牛)将 POLLED 等位基因导入美国荷斯坦牛和泽西牛种群,对 3 种无角交配方案进行了模拟,并与仅基于终生净效益(NM$)的基线选择进行了比较,历时 20 年。情景重复了 10 次,并计算了 HORNED 等位基因频率、近交系数、遗传增益(NM$)和使用的独特种公牛数量的变化。基因编辑在 20 年内将 HORNED 等位基因的频率降低到<0.1,这与两种品种的常规繁殖一样快或更快。在仅使用现有纯合隐性无角种公牛的交配方案中,近交系数达到 17%(荷斯坦)和 14%(泽西),而在基线方案中不到 7%。然而,在相同的交配方案中,基因编辑导致的近交系数显著降低,荷斯坦为 9%,泽西为 8%。此外,与两种品种的常规繁殖相比,基因编辑在 20 年后导致 NM$显著提高。此外,两种品种的基因编辑情景与常规繁殖或基线情景相比,使用的独特种公牛数量显著增加。总体而言,我们的模拟表明,考虑到目前有角和无角奶牛种公牛的遗传优势,使用常规繁殖方法降低 HORNED 等位基因的频率将增加近交系数并减缓遗传改良。此外,本研究还展示了如何利用基因编辑技术快速降低美国奶牛种群中 HORNED 等位基因的频率,同时保持遗传增益速度,将近交系数限制在可接受的水平,并同时解决新出现的动物福利问题。