Mueller Maci L, Cole John B, Connors Natalie K, Johnston David J, Randhawa Imtiaz A S, Van Eenennaam Alison L
Department of Animal Science, University of California, Davis, Davis, CA, United States.
Animal Genomics and Improvement Laboratory, Agricultural Research Service, United States Department of Agricultural, Beltsville, MD, United States.
Front Genet. 2021 Feb 11;12:593154. doi: 10.3389/fgene.2021.593154. eCollection 2021.
Dehorning is the process of physically removing horns to protect animals and humans from injury, but the process is costly, unpleasant, and faces increasing public scrutiny. Genetic selection for polled (hornless), which is genetically dominant to horned, is a long-term solution to eliminate the need for dehorning. However, due to the limited number of polled Australian Brahman bulls, the northern Australian beef cattle population remains predominantly horned. The potential to use gene editing to produce high-genetic-merit polled cattle was recently demonstrated. To further explore the concept, this study simulated introgression of the allele into a tropically adapted Australian beef cattle population via conventional breeding or gene editing (top 1% or 10% of seedstock bulls/year) for 3 polled mating schemes and compared results to baseline selection on genetic merit (Japan Ox selection index, $JapOx) alone, over the course of 20 years. The baseline scenario did not significantly decrease the 20-year allele frequency (80%), but resulted in one of the fastest rates of genetic gain ($8.00/year). Compared to the baseline, the conventional breeding scenarios where polled bulls were preferentially used for breeding, regardless of their genetic merit, significantly decreased the 20-year allele frequency (30%), but resulted in a significantly slower rate of genetic gain ($6.70/year, ≤ 0.05). The mating scheme that required the exclusive use of homozygous polled bulls, resulted in the lowest 20-year allele frequency (8%), but this conventional breeding scenario resulted in the slowest rate of genetic gain ($5.50/year). The addition of gene editing the top 1% or 10% of seedstock bull calves/year to each conventional breeding scenario resulted in significantly faster rates of genetic gain (up to $8.10/year, ≤ 0.05). Overall, our study demonstrates that, due to the limited number of polled Australian Brahman bulls, strong selection pressure on polled will be necessary to meaningfully increase the number of polled animals in this population. Moreover, these scenarios illustrate how gene editing could be a tool for accelerating the development of high-genetic-merit homozygous polled sires to mitigate the current trade-off of slower genetic gain associated with decreasing allele frequency in the Australian Brahman population.
去角是指通过物理方式去除牛角,以保护动物和人类免受伤害,但该过程成本高昂、令人不适,且面临越来越多的公众审视。对无角(无角基因对有角基因呈显性遗传)进行基因选择是消除去角需求的长期解决方案。然而,由于澳大利亚无角婆罗门公牛数量有限,澳大利亚北部肉牛群体仍主要为有角。最近已证明利用基因编辑培育高遗传价值无角牛的潜力。为进一步探究这一概念,本研究模拟了通过常规育种或基因编辑(每年对1%或10%的种公牛进行编辑)将该等位基因渗入热带适应性澳大利亚肉牛群体的过程,针对3种无角交配方案进行了研究,并将结果与仅基于遗传价值的基线选择(日本牛选择指数,$JapOx$)在20年期间的结果进行了比较。基线方案并未显著降低20年的该等位基因频率(80%),但实现了最快的遗传进展速度之一(每年8.00美元)。与基线相比,优先使用无角公牛进行育种(无论其遗传价值如何)的常规育种方案显著降低了20年的该等位基因频率(30%),但遗传进展速度显著较慢(每年6.70美元,$P\leq0.05$)。仅使用纯合无角公牛的交配方案导致20年的该等位基因频率最低(8%),但这种常规育种方案导致遗传进展速度最慢(每年5.50美元)。在每个常规育种方案中每年对1%或10%的种公牛犊进行基因编辑,可显著加快遗传进展速度(每年高达8.10美元,$P\leq0.05$)。总体而言,我们的研究表明,由于澳大利亚无角婆罗门公牛数量有限,要切实增加该群体中无角动物的数量,就必须对无角性状施加强大的选择压力。此外,这些方案说明了基因编辑如何能够成为加速培育高遗传价值纯合无角种公牛的工具,以缓解当前澳大利亚婆罗门群体中与降低该等位基因频率相关的遗传进展放缓的权衡问题。