Department of Radiation Oncology, SS. Annunziata Hospital, "G. D'Annunzio" University of Chieti, Chieti, Italy.
Radiation Oncology Department, Istituto Nazionale Tumori-IRCSS-Fondazione G. Pascale, Naples, Italy.
Radiol Med. 2019 Jul;124(7):682-692. doi: 10.1007/s11547-019-01006-y. Epub 2019 Mar 9.
This study, promoted by Italian Association of Radiotherapy and Clinical Oncology (AIRO) Head and Neck Group, aimed to assess the current national practice of target volume delineation on a case of neck lymph node metastases from unknown primary evaluating inter-observer variability, in a setting of primary radiotherapy.
A case of metastatic neck lymph node from occult primary was proposed to 17 radiation oncologists. A national reference RT center was identified and considered as benchmark. Participants were requested to delineate target volumes. A structured questionnaire was administered. A comparison between following parameters of the CTVs was performed: centroids distances, Dice similarity index (DSI), Jaccard index and mean distance to agreement (MDA). Volume expressed in cubic centimeters and CTVs cranio-caudal extension were evaluated.
Sixteen of 17 radiation oncologists recommended three CTVs dose levels. (CTV HD, CTV ID and CTV LD); CTV ID was not delineated by one of the participants and by the reference center. The distance between the reference centroid and the mean centroid of CTVs HD was 1.09 cm (0.36-3.99 cm); for CTV LD, a mean centroids distance of 2.45 (0.27-4.83 cm) was found, and for CTV HD, mean DSI is 0.48 and mean Jaccard index is 0.32 and MDA was 8.89 mm. CTV LD showed a mean DSI of 0.46, mean Jaccard index of 0.31 and MDA of 14.87 when compared to the reference.
Many aspects concerning treatment optimization of cervical nodes metastases from occult primary remain unclear, and we found a notable heterogeneity of global radiotherapy management reporting discordances both in target volume delineation and volume prescription.
本研究由意大利放射治疗和临床肿瘤学协会(AIRO)头颈部组发起,旨在评估在原发放疗环境下,评估颈部淋巴结转移来自未知原发灶的情况下,勾画靶区的当前国家实践,并评估其观察者间变异性。
为 17 名放射肿瘤学家提供了一个隐匿性原发灶颈部淋巴结转移的病例。确定了一个全国参考放射治疗中心作为基准,并要求参与者勾画靶区。同时还进行了一项结构问卷调查。对 CTV 中心的以下参数进行了比较:中心点距离、Dice 相似性指数(DSI)、Jaccard 指数和平均一致距离(MDA)。还评估了以立方厘米表示的体积和 CTV 头脚延伸。
17 名放射肿瘤学家中有 16 名推荐了 3 个 CTV 剂量水平(CTV HD、CTV ID 和 CTV LD);其中一个参与者和参考中心没有勾画 CTV ID。参考中心点与 CTV HD 的平均中心点之间的距离为 1.09cm(0.36-3.99cm);CTV LD 的平均中心点距离为 2.45cm(0.27-4.83cm),而 CTV HD 的平均 DSI 为 0.48,平均 Jaccard 指数为 0.32,MDA 为 8.89mm。与参考相比,CTV LD 的平均 DSI 为 0.46,平均 Jaccard 指数为 0.31,MDA 为 14.87。
许多关于隐匿性原发灶颈部淋巴结转移的治疗优化方面仍不清楚,我们发现,在靶区勾画和体积处方方面,存在显著的全局放疗管理报告不一致性。